Best hunting gun for deer with medium recoil

Status
Not open for further replies.
I probably shouldn't have even chimed in earlier. I hunt in MN for whitetail. 30° temps max during whitetail season. I recall a few hunts that needed a snowmobile to haul the deer back. So a big coat does a heck of a lot for felt recoil. Plus the adrenaline when the buck creeps out of the woods, recoil is non existent. 300 win mag. 243 win. You don't feel it when it's time to pull the trigger.

Southern hunters wearing just a t shirt may feel a little more kick :D but again, in my experience the adrenaline kills that. I still recommend 243 if your concerned. 260 rem was also an excellent suggestion along with the 6.5 Grendel.
 
In my experience, when it comes time to make the one shot, the muzzle blast is also less perceived. Muzzle blast being reduced by hearing protection mostly not worn in the field, with a .243 or other lighter recoiling cartridge, almost anybody can shoot more at the range in whatever preparation for hunting.
 
I shot this buck on the trot at 50 yards and when it went off I was "dang that was annoying" (blast).
Killed several dozen deer and a bunch of other critters...........but dang if that rigs 20" bbl blast got noticed above and beyond my bullet placement focus.
View attachment 835235

Kinda miss that rifle. Purchased to rebarrel to .35 rem, but bought a Rem 760 in that.
Figured my next #1 would be more polite, a #1A w 22" bbl.
 
Last edited:
i have shot a few deer with short barrels, when you shoot and the deer is DRT your like were the deer go lol. worst thing was my dads 14 inch savage striker in 7wsm with the brake, shot lights out tho.
 
I shot this buck on the trot at 50 yards and when it went off I was "dang that was annoying" (blast).
Killed several dozen deer and a bunch of other critters...........but dang if that rigs 20" bbl blast got noticed above and beyond my bullet placement focus.
View attachment 835235

Kinda miss that rifle. Purchased to rebarrel to .35 rem, but bought a Rem 760 in that.
Figured my next #1 would be more polite, a #1A w 22" bbl.
18" 788 .243.......not to be shot close to dusk ;) the perk is, after the bullet strikes, the fireball gives em a heart attack and they just fall over! Still though, doesn't leave a mark on the shooter's end!
 
One of the things I miss most about hunting in the old days was the stories of the older generation. Back in the 60's in the Virginia mountains deer hunting was more a social thing. We averaged killing two deer a year on the farm. When the season rolled around, my father's World War II buddies showed up, and the assortment of rifles they carried was amazing. While they went into the cabin to play poker and reminisce, I was tasked with checking the zeroes of the rifles. I shot Mausers, Enfields, Springfields, every manner of pre-World War II sporting rifle.

But back to cartridges, and specifically the .32 Winchester Special. If I were really hungry, would I pick it up as opposed to a bolt action telescopically sighted .308? I suppose that would depend upon the nature and the closeness of the cover. But much, I think can be learned about hunting and perhaps life with such a rifle in your hands.

A few years ago, late in the season, I had a Model 55 .32 Winchester Special, full buckhorn sights out with me, loaded with 180 grain RCBS cast bullets, at about a similar velocity to a factory jacketed load, and accurate enough on a calm day in good light to shoot a ragged hole at fifty yards, about as good as I can ever hope to do with aging eyes. In bad light, I tend to be very careful about the shot I'll take. What I did once on a warm afternoon in flat light means very little under the rigors of the hunt.

Two little bucks started going wild over a doe. I'd hate to have somebody hunting me when I was in the condition they were in. It might cause me to redefine my idea of sporting.

After a few minutes of watching, it was obvious the one buck had the inside track, and the poor second buck was going to come out too late and too slow. Realizing this, the second buck stopped to consider his situation. And there I was, twenty-five yards away in the shadows, an easy shot. With an expanded chunk of wheel weight straight through where he lives, he didn't get out of sight.

So there's your life lesson that any young hunter reading this ought by rights to pay strict attention to: If you're losing in love, keep pushing. Don't never stop to think about it. Cause sumptin might be waiting in the shadows ready to put you in the pot.
.

While I’m just in my mid 40’s I’ve not known or recalled well enough those who were of that age group, but an early memory is sitting with a WW2 vet who talked about his boat sunk and the sharks that came for them within days.

I can certainly appreciate your being tasked with checking the various rifles. My father loves to rebuild old rifles such as that. There’s just something magical I think about those old rifles.

But I absolutely loved your life lesson story!
 
I had a 600 in .243 win.
Kid didn't want to deer hunt (bought it for her) so let it go.
Figured I'd rather have a 660 in .308.
Of course now she says she might want to deer hunt. Yeah whatever.
The 600 had 18.5.........and was annoying, but seemed less than that 20" #1.
Maybe I'm just getting more sensitive to recoil/blast in my old age.
 
Don't Remington and Federal still make reduced-recoil loads?

Years ago, I had good success with Rem's Managed Recoil in .30-06, and the recoil was pretty mild.
 
Just picked up a used Ruger American Predator 6.5 grendel, takes AR mags and with the heavy barrel is not particularly light.

Have not shot it yet, but I imagine it will recoil much like a .223. Nice little gun should be loads of fun!
 
Not a large fella,
I been shooting rem 6mm in 742 for 25+ years (yes, a 742)
Exactly accurate. Kept it clean & lubed. Surprisingly low recoil.
Recently added model 700 6mm bdl w/varmint barrel. recoil is much less than model 742.
Ruger 96-44 mag is another low recoil round I shoot. Anything I have found in America.
 
Use your short barrels or your muzzle brakes - just please don't come to the range and use the bench next to me. Or, just don't come till I done gone home. Shooting near someone firein' one of them things is misery.

BTW, have never killed a deer but with a traditional muzzleloader. Have a Savage 99 in .308, and my wife a 7mm-08, and we are dying to try them. But since we live in New Mexico, and have a very English last name, tags are hard to come by.
 
How does a .270 compare to a 30-30?
I'm comparing recoil here

My Ruger M77 .270 kicks harder than my Marlin 30-30 ever thought about. I use a 150 grn rn sp bullet in the .270 and a 170 grn rn sp in the Marlin, by way of comparison. Remington cartridges in each, also. I prefer the 30-30 for most of my hunting, as I hunt brushy, close country. Its a short, handy rifle that carries easy and doesn't recoil much at all. Follow up shots are fast as well. There isn't a nickle's difference in the weight of either gun. Only reason I prefer the 30-30 is I have 7 shots at my disposal, and the wild hog population around here is increasing. I have yet to need more than one shot from my Marlin on a hog, but have had the opportunity to knock out 3 or 4 and once, 6, at one time (more luck than skill, I assure you!). For many years, I eschewed the 30-30 in favor of the old '06 Springfield. But now, as I age, I find the recoil of the old WCF to be much more pleasant.

Now, as far as a good, light weight long distance hunting cartridge for deer, I would recommend to the OP the 25-06. I have an M77 mk II with heavy barrel. It is superbly accurate out to 400 yards (farthest I've shot it) with Hornady's 117 grn loading. The rifle is a bit heavy, but unless you're doing a lot of walking over open country, you wouldn't notice it. I walk mine from the truck to the stand (~ 80 yards) and back. Recoil, even when shooting groups on a bench, is negligible. This is due to the weight, I think more than anything. The .243, while a good choice, never really suited me. The one I had wouldn't group under 2 inches at 100 yards and if there was ANY little stick or leaf or grass in the way, Lord help you. The 25 is a bit more forgiving (and the 30-30 even more so) when it comes to shot placement. The 25, .270, and the old ought six will allow you to break a shoulder bone/joint should you be required to do so. I do not advocate that, but we all know there are times when a quick anchor shot must be made. I whole-heartedly recommend the .25-06 (in a medium-weight rifle) as a light kicking, straight shooting cartridge.

Mac
 
Use your short barrels or your muzzle brakes - just please don't come to the range and use the bench next to me. Or, just don't come till I done gone home. Shooting near someone firein' one of them things is misery.

BTW, have never killed a deer but with a traditional muzzleloader. Have a Savage 99 in .308, and my wife a 7mm-08, and we are dying to try them. But since we live in New Mexico, and have a very English last name, tags are hard to come by.

It's sad to hear how the game department in NM has ruined hunting.
 
7-08 for medium to lower recoil, .223 for least recoil that with proper placement and bullet is very good on deer. I have owned a couple .243's but not crazy for them on deer. Had much better results with 7-08. Anything more is guy's trying to sound macho.
 
Did I mention that I killed my first deer with a .30-30? I don't recommend discounting it. While plenty of guys will point to 170gr, plenty will say 150gr is plenty too. In my case, a 150gr CoreLokt put 'em down fast. Placement is the key with anything. While others don't care for .243's, I've had real good results. While I don't discount .223's, I'd argue in favor of .30-30 and .243 first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top