Cheap pistol for personal protection

Which Pistol

  • G2C

  • EC9s


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I cut my Ruger LCP in half and threw it out if that's any indication of which way to go.
Yea... I liked my Shield, but my wife liked it more after her LC9 Pro went back to be fixed. Now we're stuck with a LC9 that neither of us are interested in... I like Ruger revolvers and their CS, but not fond of any of their pistols or rifles. The G2C is a much better option for a multipurpose pistol.
 
Hello, this is my first post. Need help deciding between Taurus G2C and the Ruger EC9s. The Taurus looks and feels like a much better pistol, but the kids at the gun shop won't shut up about Ruger quality. Taurus has more capacity and better trigger. Not my first pistol, but I will be buying three 9mm modern pistols for myself, my wife, and our son who is going to Liberty University this fall. Something easy to load (magazines and racking slide) is a priority, my son has some issues with strength in his left arm from motorcycle accident. No need to run reliably with hollow points, full metal jackets have gotten the job done before, but if it does that's a positive. I am open to other pistols but keep in mind I'm buying 3 guns.

Would appreciate first hand experience. Thank you.

The Taurus isn't as easy to conceal and the Ruger is way harder to shoot. If at all possible go to a range where you can rent and shoot both before making up your mind.

I own both a Taurus G2 and a Ruger EC9S and mine are equally reliable. I shoot the Taurus more accurately, have much less trouble getting a grip that avoids the slide stop (Really hard if you have large hands and a EC9S). I also find the Taurus pleasant to shoot. The Ruger not so much.

Locally the G2C is $174.99 (after $25 Rebate), the E2CS is $199.99 and a 9mm Shield M1.0 $274.99.

If at all possible I would get the 9mm Shield (I dont own the 9mm but I do the .45) and I had much rather shoot the .45 Shield than the EC9S.

PS I have been very happy with my LCP. Two malfunctions in 815 Rounds. One was a brand new magazine the follower stuck on and the other an out of spec round. Neither we're the pistols fault.
 
I am apparently different than many of the other posters. I own lots of service pistols. Some are police or military surplus. I expect them to last tens of thousands of rounds, and they do. So far none of them have disappointed me. My Ruger Blackhawks are the same. I will shoot them as much as I feel like and never worry about them; with standard ammo they will last longer than I will.

I feel differently about small light carry handguns. I don't assume that they were designed with tens of thousands of rounds in mind. Once I've broken them in and gotten used to them, I shoot them sparingly...maybe a few magazines every couple of months. I can get my practice in on similar handguns which are sturdier and/or not carried. IMHO, a small pocket handgun and a competition gun are different creatures and should be treated differently. I don't expect my LCP to hold up for 100,000 rounds, and I don't expect my good 1911 to fit in the breast pocket of my shirt.
 
I am apparently different than many of the other posters. I own lots of service pistols. Some are police or military surplus. I expect them to last tens of thousands of rounds, and they do. So far none of them have disappointed me. My Ruger Blackhawks are the same. I will shoot them as much as I feel like and never worry about them; with standard ammo they will last longer than I will.

I feel differently about small light carry handguns. I don't assume that they were designed with tens of thousands of rounds in mind. Once I've broken them in and gotten used to them, I shoot them sparingly...maybe a few magazines every couple of months. I can get my practice in on similar handguns which are sturdier and/or not carried. IMHO, a small pocket handgun and a competition gun are different creatures and should be treated differently. I don't expect my LCP to hold up for 100,000 rounds, and I don't expect my good 1911 to fit in the breast pocket of my shirt.

Tallball has a point there, little guns wear out and break sooner and easier than bigger, holster-size pistols. My PF-9 broke the connector once and I dialed back my shooting with it. She still sees range time, just not as often. Some might say that was a sign it couldn't be trusted, but she broke shooting 147 grain mid-range reloads. Now I stick with milder 115s that replicate the Critical Defense loads I carry. A lot easier on my hand as well,little guns can hurt after awhile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top