Safton
Member
I will echo the thoughts of others. I used to own a PPQ, still own a VP9. I don't hate Walthers as I have a PPS. Grip was slick on PPQ and I thought in an SD situation, it would even be more slick.
I actually liked the stock grip texture quite a bit. Didn't find it that bad at all. I put TALON grips on it regardless because I absolutely love the feel of them both in terms of ergos and traction, but I personally found it to be serviceable from the factory. YMMV.
The thing that kept me from getting the VP9 was that the PPQ edged it out in ergos and trigger ever so slightly by my personal estimation. The PPQ was also a bit cheaper and -- a big one here -- actually offered 17-round mags where as HK had no plans on the horizon for them which I found mind-boggling for a 9mm service pistol of the VP's generation.
You heard right. They are also a bargain, I paid under $420 for mine and 3 mags were included. I have the 4 inch M1. The paddle mag release is very intuitive and I like that it is fully ambidextrous. It is a very nice shooter as well, very easy to control.
Nice, you got a better deal than I did and I don't feel I got ripped off either! I have the M2. I was of the mind that all of my experience was with a "traditional" American-style mag release and Walther along with aftermarket support seemed to be trending toward the M2, so I just got the newer model. Sometimes I regret not getting the paddle release though as I've heard good things.
On the controllability aspect: this is actually one strike I'll put against the PPQ in my personal findings shooting it compared to other handguns in the same weight class using the same loads, I get a bit more muzzle flip and slightly slower follow-up shots. Nothing ground-breaking and something I could solve with practice, absolutely, but I've noticed it. I think it's a symptom of the high bore axis. In terms of accuracy and how it feels when shooting it's absolutely phenomenal, however, no doubt.