Is the S&W 6904 less popular than most 3rd. Gen. Compact 9mm types?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
9,373
Location
The Mid-South.
SW-semi-model-chart-1.jpg ------- :scrutiny:Have watched one in good condition for weeks. It might not have features which most people prefer- even In the context of these older DA/SA types.
The external condition is good, price is competitive, and it is an Israeli "turn-in".

Either the gun has features less popular than some other 3rd. Gen Compacts, or people might be suspicious of foreign turn-ins when the gun has not been manufactured for many years?

I owned a 5906 and can't imagine that there would be any real question about a 3rd Gen's reliability or ruggedness.
My main handguns are all former LEO/federal agent types (Czech, German),all compact, therefore wouldn't mind finally having a >compact< 3rd. Gen. in 9mm, if at a very competitive price...for Nov. 2020.

* This chart on Google Images is easy to click and expand.

.
 
Last edited:
The compact 3rd gen 9's, in both the single and double stack models, were very popular during the heyday of the metal pistols.

Personally, when it comes to an imported "service" gun, especially one with an aluminum frame, I'd be very cautious of buying one that had spent its service life in a harsh sandy environment for myself. Who knows how it was treated, serviced and maintained? American cops can abuse their duty weapons bad enough, but foreign cops? Going without sufficient oil on the aluminum rails can chew up a frame, and not replacing a recoil spring often enough can batter frames.

I'd much rather look around for a privately owned late production 6906. One made after the introduction of MIM and the wider barrel tab & breech face cut. Hopefully one that spent virtually all of its life in the safe, and hadn't been modified or "improved" upon by the original owner.

I tried to wear out a couple of my older issued 6906's, from the early 3rd gen production ('89/'90). The later production guns benefited from improved tolerances and manufacturing (CNC). Even those older 6906's were great working guns (I staked my life on them, at the same time I was using them as my training guns as a firearms instructor).

Me? I'd be willing to pay upwards of $200 for an excellent condition early production (square trigger guard) model, and maybe up to twice that for an excellent-to-LNIB late production version. That's me, though. I don't pay arm & a leg retail or hard-to-get prices for old guns. :p Even though I have the parts to rebuild them.
 
I had one a long time ago which did, in fact, have heavy galling on the frame rails. Still functioned perfectly, though. I just made sure keep the rails greased.

Terrible DA trigger, not super accurate, IIRC. Not crazy about how the plastic grips retain the mainspring.

Personally, I think the 2nd- gen guns, like the 469, were superior thanks to their full metal grip frame. Hard to find now, though.

Good luck!
 
Last edited:
There's nothing wrong with the 6904/6 and I wouldn't be upset if one was issued to me. I just don't like the ergonomics. When it comes to 3rd-Gen series I've always preferred the single-stacks, particularly the 3913.
 
I agree Devonai, I had the 4006, 5906, 4506, 4013, 3906 3913 and 6906. Sold them all and kept the 3906 and 3913. I wished they were not collectors, I would CCW that 3913 in a heartbeat. And I love the 3906. Fits my hand great. Too bad I have not shot any of them in a long time.
 
I've long had my eye out for a 3906. I did once own a 909 which was the "budget" version of the same platform, but I was not impressed with the quality.
 
fastbolt: I didn't suggest fine sand or dust, becausr the external areas look good.

The very scratched Israeli CZ-83s (a whole Batch were listed about three years ago) and P228s were in photos on Gunbroker.

Even if the external areas look good, I'm curious about the hidden internal areas.


NOTE: the listing has been removed.----------------------------------------------------------
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top