Possibly upgrade to a different carry weapon.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Palladan44

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2020
Messages
1,903
My favorites have always been Glocks for workn carry guns. They work, theyre what I first trained on, and they always do the job I need them to.....so naturally I've never needed more...
Way back when, long before Glock made their single stacked option, I went with the Kahr K9 and the later Kahr CW9 for the single stacked IWB carry option....

Meanwhile many years later, I'm wondering if it's time to update.

Can I expect anything advantageous from moving away from my 25 year old Kahr K9 on to a newer design/maker?
Thought about removing it from full time service just due to age. It has had several parts and springs replaced over the years.

What can new guns do that my old Kahr K9 or CW9 can't?
When Glock came out with the 43, It made me really really wonder...
 
I'm liking the Sig 365. Roughly the same size as the G43, but with 10+1 capability and 12 round mags as an option. Mine with 10 round mags is my go-to IWB gun. With the 12 round mags it has largely replaced my G19 for OWB carry.

Sig gives you the option of a 1911 style safety too. Which I like, mine has the safety. The Sig has a bit lighter trigger which helps make it easier to shoot accurately. But that lighter trigger means I'm more comfortable with a safety while I don't mind my Glocks not having one.
 
I just made the jump from a J frame size revolver to the S&W M&P 9 2.0.
After reading comments from some members here over the years, and my daughter working as an RN in the only level 1 Trauma Center within 100 miles, I thought maybe it was time.
It's amazing how safe we feel until one finds out what comes through our ERs that doesn't make the front page news.
From now on, HI Cap Duty Pistol stoked with +P defense ammo for me.
 
Well, the double stack micro 9 revolution started with the P365 a couple of years ago and many manufacturers have followed suit. Glock's answer was the 43X, probably the most similar to your K9 being a single stack with a longer grip that holds 10. There's an aftermarket mag that holds 15 rounds. Also, red dots are the latest trend with handguns, so if you feel the need for a micro red dot on your carry pistol...your in luck..most are available with optic cuts.
 
With the K9, you could get a lighter gun with higher capacity. That's about it and personally I think you have a nice, classic gun to keep using. I had an MK9 for awhile and it really made me think about picking up a K9.

With the CW9, capacity is about all you'd gain.
 
Moved from a CW380 to a P365 with safety. I noted the following whiich can apply to a lot of the new micro 9's:

Size was larger, to be expected moving up to 9mm. It was not a large step, just noticeable.

Holsters are plentiful, I couldn't use the previous Pistol Wear and had to buy new

Weight - a ten round stack will be slightly heavier. So will the extra mag.

Capacity - with spare mag, 20 round minimum, which is one mag change less than a 6 shot. Thats one less required downtime or a fumble.

Manual of arms, virtually identical. The additional left side safety I installed is more appropriate for the lighter triggers we are now seeing as the makers move away from 6# + triggers. I have a Canik which is even less using a SAFE action trigger and while appropriate for a field gun OWB I would not carry that style in CCW. My experience is largely based on older guns which predominantly used safeties hammer or striker fired, which is the standard in military carry. With a CC pistol, negligent discharges are far less with a thumb safety than a SAFE action trigger. Arguable, yes, however the sad and declarative situation is they call it Glock leg.

Optics on pistols are a hot topic now, I prefer to continue with traditional irons on a CCW for weight, less chance of failure, and less snagging. It's a 7 yard target in a lot of situations, reaching out to 50m as one police study claimed. The issue for a concealed carrier begs the question weren't we supposed to be getting away from the shooter, not engaging them at distance? There is a whole lot of Walmart, mall, or gas station at 50m.

Weapons mounted lights are also a trend and for the most part the professionals are recommending a separate hand held light for adminstrative or even tactical use, primarily because pulling a weapon out of a holster is presenting lethal force - if the situation is already determined then go ahead, but escalating or making it a lethal force situation with no other other cause puts the onus on the brandisher to justify. It's being discussed on another forum and the reasoning that one side uses to justify using the WML for lighting up the scene ignores the presentation of lethat force argument. Unfortunately, do that in public and an off duty LEO or CCW won't.

I chose the SIG primarily because of the removable FCU - the trigger works have the serial number, the grip unit can be exchanged for different lengths, colors are optional, longer slides available, and cut slides for RMRs, too, without expensive gunsmithing. When I installed the safety I did the work using a 3D printed clip in jig, using the standard ambidextrous which I converted to left side only. This kind of work on the gun at home is common with SIG P365 and many do it. It's become the "AR15" of handguns because of it, which fits for me as I'm assembling my third one. It's as easy as installing a door knob or an alternator - frankly, easier. Much of that cannot be done with traditional serial numbered frames - Glocks with safeties are sold on contract to various PD's internationally but in America there is only one shop I'm aware of and it's $199. The parts for my SIG ran under $65 with jig.

You may find one of the other 5 makers in this market who gets more of what you want in their pistol, which is great, because we have so much selection. Get your hands on them and shoot some at a rental if possible.
 
If you like Glocks, take a look at the G43X. It has a grip that is the same length as the G19 but carries a 10-rd single stack mag. Shield Arms makes a 15-rd mag for it though you need to add the Shield metal mag release to use with the metal shield mags. I've rented both the Sig 365X and the G43X and prefer the Glock, even though I'm basically a 1911 or Springer XD guy.

Good luck,

Harry
 
In what way has the Kahr failed to fulfill its mission? If it hasn't then maybe it doesn't really need to be replaced.
Magazine back plates crack and fly apart when they hit the ground. I HATE this. And the mags are about 40$ per....other than this, I can't find any complaints
 
Magazine back plates crack and fly apart when they hit the ground. I HATE this. And the mags are about 40$ per....other than this, I can't find any complaints

I had that problem with Kahr .45 magazines, but not (so far) with the 9mm mags... and I have about 10 of them. As expensive as they are, you would think Kahr would address the durability of their magazines.

Truthfully, after 10+ years of carrying a CW9, I still don't have want for anything different. What works, works, and works very well.

I've got 3 CW9's in the fleet... so I can dual wield and have a backup.

0Rdoya7m.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top