forward observer
Member
Oh no. The 1842 is another I'd really like to have, I would have to settle for reproduction of course. I am a "shoot any antique" type of guy, but yeah messing with the frizzen might not be something to do lightly. However, there are lots of flintlock parts on the market, finding a frizzen that's close enough to the original would be possible, and then fit it to the gun for shooting and set the original one aside.
Having said that, I have a rifle made pre-1846, that was with the Donner party when it first set out, and I had some restoration work done on it so we could shoot it. And it's a good shooter. Still accurate. And I have taken it for walks in the woods. As it is a family heirloom it will never be sold, in my lifetime, any reduction in value that caused is of no concern.
Wow those flinglock pistols, I see several I'd love to have. Nice.
Thanks for the comments. Oddly, no company has ever tried to reproduce either the M1842 or M1836. I guess they figured there wouldn't be enough demand. One can find the M1842's quite often in shooting condition and they used to even have a smoothbore shooting category for them at the North-South Skirmish Association annual national shoots.
There was a time when you could find one in decent shooting condition for under $300 or $400 but those days are long gone. The barrels on them have quite thick walls
so having them bored out and relined was a way to get them back into action for the smoothbore competition.
I have found a place that sells some reproduction parts for the M1836 and they do have a roughcast repro of the frizzen for $32. It doesn't even have the mounting hole drilled but I may order one just to do as you mentioned. However, I'm not sure it would be worth it now since I don't get out and shoot as much as I used to when I still had young eyes.
Cheers