I may just end up getting a LCR and learning to use it effectively. I don't think 5 rounds are much worse than 7, in a realistic SD situation. If you as a civilian need a reload you're likely screwed anyway. I just need a reliable gun that I can trust. I do have, love, and carry G26 but far prefer a smaller option in summer.
I have examples where 5 hits failed to incapacitate a single attacker, but those might not be deemed "realistic".
If LE was involved - I know, nope that's not civilian.
If it happened in a liquor store - Nope, don't work in liquor store, inapplicable.
How about this:
https://www.buckeyefirearms.org/alternate-look-handgun-stopping-power
For discussions sake lets say averages are realistic.
You can't shoot 1.8 rounds, so that is two rounds on average to incapacitate an attacker based on 199 shooting with 38 special.
We see an average accuracy rate of about 75% so despite that we all shoot like John Wick, lets ponder a miss.
Based on averages of actual shootings, it is possible to shoot 3 rounds to stop (incapacitate) one attacker.
I do not think it unrealistic to entertain the idea of two attackers, in which case that is 6 rounds fired.
I'd be much more comfortable with a Glock 26 than a LCR.
It gets hot in the summer; Yea, I'm familiar with that in FL.
I'm about 6'1 / 203# and wearing a thin untucked shirt and shorts I have no trouble concealing a Glock 19 AIWB in the FL heat.
We might not think civilian self defense could require multiple rounds, but I'd rather have rounds remaining than be empty before threat(s) are incapacitated.
I'd rather not have to reload and since this guy soaked up multiple hits and was not quickly incapacitated, IMO its not unrealistic that it could happen again.
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/v...deputy-soaks-up-12-rounds-before-hes-stopped/