Armscor 206 Range Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrFox

Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2009
Messages
174
Location
Good Ol' WPA
I recently went on a quest for a pocketable pistola. I went to my favorite local gun store and tried out quite a few. The usual gambit of 442, 642, Tauri offerings, NAA guardian, LCP, LCR, P-3AT, one of those tiny little 22s, an M40 and M36 S&W, whatever the ultra light 357 snub is, Bond Arms derringer, you know, the usual. I even tried to shove a Glock 26 and an M&P9c into my pocket without much luck.

As I was contemplating and pondering life in general (like we all do at the gun counter), I saw an odd looking revolver tucked into the corner of the case. I inquired and out came what looked like a parkerized Colt. It fit my hand better than the 442 and LCR I had myself narrowed down to, provided one extra round for whatever that’s worth, had decent sights, fit in my pocket, heavier, and had a price tag that was almost fully half of everything else. And, it passed the revolver check out with semi-impressive results for such a low-cost revolver.

I bought it. That was unusual because I generally research a lot before I make a decision, but I figured if anything I could return it towards something else. So, my researched turned up little except that the Armscor that looked so much like a Colt Detective Special, was in fact made on the same machines and under license from Colt. It is NOT rated for +P, just like the DS. However, I think with limited use it should be safe.

I finally got a chance to take it to the range with some standard 38 special loads, and was very impressed. The useable sights provided a great sight picture for a snubbie. The recoil was very manageable due to the extra weight, and the trigger was better than expected.

From 7-8 yards I was able to keep all rounds in the black with some effort. Towards the end of my shooting, I was making some very tight 3 and 4 round groups. With rapid fire, the group opened up, but that was no surprise. (DISCLAIMER: The first and only handgun I shot for a very long time was a 6 inch Colt Trooper MKIII, 357 mag. I know my way around a revolver pretty well.)

I really don’t have any complaints against the Armscor 206. While it might not be a 442, it sure beats a pointy stick.

As for carry ammo, I am torn between the re-released Nyclad round and something in the +P flavor.

I would include pictures, but it’s nothing no one hasn’t already seen.

So does anyone else have one of these sleepers, or is it just me?
 
I have thought about getting one. Recently (a few months ago) someone on the board reviewed the MDL 200. http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=411554&highlight=beater

Needless to say, I am impressed. How many rounds did you run through it? I would appreciate hearing more about the gun as you shoot it. Running through a few cylinders is one thing, running 500 rounds through with 3" groups and no problems makes them a good buy and one that is hard to pass up.

BTW, that is the weight of the gun loaded?

http://www.centerfiresystems.com/armscor.aspx
 
My digital food scale says it weights 1.74 pounds loaded with 158 grain bullets.

I put ~75 rounds through it. I know I had a full box and then a partial of another. But in those rounds, everything was fine and not even the cases stuck.

I'm not expecting to put as many rounds through this as my 15-2 or my Trooper, but when the count gets high, I'll report back. If I could just get ahold of some reloading stuff I could let you know now. But, yeah.
 
I wanted one but when I was buying three months back they just weren't available. I opted for the last Rossi "J" they had. I don't regret the Rossi and its been a great snub, but the Armscor has that classic look I love. I might pick one up just for fun if my better half oks it.

I would like it if you'd keep us informed on how it does. X
 
I tried the M200s last year and was very sad with what I got. If you got a good 206 - that's excellent.
 
What problems did you have with the M200? I noticed a little bit of leading, but that is to be expected with my cheap factory reloads. They didn't even agree with my 15-2.

I think with the cheaper/lower cost/lower quality stuff you have to check it out, and part of it is just luck of the draw. I certanily would not have bought it without touching on it.

I also don't look at it as much as a "saturday night special" as some others might.

If anything, it is an affordable carry piece that should hold up well if someone does not have a lot of spare money laying around. I know I don't.
 
MrFox,

I am pleased to read that you are satisfied with your new Armscor. I was thinking of purchasing one a few months back, but after reading a very negative post, I passed. I recollect they make a snubbie as well, which is what I was looking for. Thanks for the post.
 
tekarra: The 206 is the snubbie. It sort of looks like a Colt Commando. My guess is that its a cousin and not a knock off. I would just do the revolver check out and see if it passes. It is early in the shooting stages, so who knows how it will be further down the road. But for now, its fine.
 
Found a pic of the 206...

armscorp_51281.jpg


And its big brother, the Model 200

armscorp_51261.jpg


*sigh*
 
I emailed the Rock Island rep (Ivan) a year or so ago about using +P in these. My specific question was if +P could be used "occassionally," and I defined occassionally as "shooting a couple cylinders full to see how it shot POA relative to POI with an occassional cylinder full for practice/ammo rotation." He said it should be able to handle that, but would not recommend much more.

So, take that for what's worth...
|
Q
 
What problems did you have with the M200?
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=416615

This is probably the most significant take-away from my eval of these revolvers:
The cylinder locks up at the rear only, and the rear of the frame does not appear to be solid around the plunger. Instead, it looks as if the plunger is retained by the cylinder latch itself, which is part of a removable left side plate. However it's constructed internally, the net result was that I could gently push on the right side of the cylinder when latched and the entire cylinder would move well more than an sixteeth of an inch (by my uncalibrated eyeball) out of alignment with the barrel. I'm not talking about a little bit of slop; the cylinder was bowing the latch assembly outward with very, very little pressure on the right side of the cylinder.
I took the sideplate off of one and verified this construction. It means that the only thing holding the cylinder laterally in place is a thin strip of sheet metal that also holds the release itself in place.

I'm sure that it's possible that they will shoot just fine, at least for a while. I'm just not willing to trust the cylinder lockup to this lash-up, and certainly not over the long haul. I could see where simply storing the revolver on its right side for any length of time could affect the cylinder's alignment with the forcing cone/barrel.
 
Hm. That is very strange. I wish I could see some pictures of it to relate to my own 206.

Mine does not have that problem. Infact, it felt just as tight as the Tauri that I checked out when I bought my 206 (for what thats worth). Infact, I wasn't really too impressed with the 442 they had. I was expecting something closer to my 15-2.

Oh well. I don't really have any problems or complaints against the 206. I would just check it out myself before buying, like with anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top