Do You Carry a Snubby? Why? Prove it.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The old argument about reliability regarding semiauto pistols versus DA revolvers ...

Inspection of ammunition is always a prudent thing for both pistols and revolvers.

Back in the days of service revolvers, shooters were taught to always allow revolver triggers to fully recover. Short-stroking a DA revolver's trigger can cause mechanical problems. Stress and rapid fire shot strings require good trigger technique (among other skills), and that includes not short-stroking a DA trigger.

In those earlier revolver days shooters also had to pay attention to their loading techniques, and not allow an empty case to slip underneath the extractor star. They also needed to keep debris (fouling, burned powder, etc) from accumulating underneath the extractor 'star'. A loosened extractor could cause issues, too.

On the other hand, the introduction of semiauto pistols as service weapons came with the requirement to teach shooters how to clear an assortment of malfunctions such as feeding stoppages and failures-to-extract, and the use of magazines introduced another variable that might sometimes allow problems. Then, there was the occasional problem that could result from an insufficiently stable grip and wrist support.

Pistols can have their slides/barrels pushed out-of-battery (into disconnect), which isn't a revolver problem ... but a revolver cylinder can be hindered in it's rotation (carry-up) under some conditions.

While revolvers do have recommendations for armorers to perform periodic inspection and maintenance (especially making sure the bearing surface lube points on yokes are lubricated) to keep them in optimal condition and operation, pistols aren't without their recommended service and maintenance intervals, either. Suffice to say that user/owner maintenance practices seemed to result in a lot more trips to an armorer's bench for pistols, than revolvers ever did. On the flip side, servicing and repairing pistols is usually easier than doing the same for revolvers.

I've never seen a revolver cylinder have a spring wear out, but I've seen my fair share of pistol magazine springs loose sufficient tension and cause feeding stoppages. ;)

They're all machines, so treat them accordingly and take reasonable steps to keep them clean and in proper operating condition. :)

Just some thoughts.
 
Pistols can have their slides/barrels pushed out-of-battery (into disconnect), which isn't a revolver problem ... but a revolver cylinder can be hindered in it's rotation (carry-up) under some conditions.

If the perp grabs the gun around the cylinder, yes. Someone, I think on this site, said in that circumstance to pull the trigger while giving your wrist a quick twist. Haven't had occasion to try it and hope I never do. One problem is that not all revolvers rotate in the same direction and the S&W is not as good for a righty as you would be twisting away from your strength.
 
If the perp grabs the gun around the cylinder, yes. Someone, I think on this site, said in that circumstance to pull the trigger while giving your wrist a quick twist. Haven't had occasion to try it and hope I never do. One problem is that not all revolvers rotate in the same direction and the S&W is not as good for a righty as you would be twisting away from your strength.

While I'm not a particular advocate of putting a defensive firearm within reach of, let alone against, an attacker ...

... if the action is that 'up-close', dynamic and frenetic, there are any number of other ways to distract someone from grasping, and maintaining a grasp, on your small revolver.

Anyway, I sometimes wonder if some folks who come up with such 'techniques' have ever actually been involved in a dynamic physical confrontation. ;)
 
I am about as big of a snub fan as there is. It’s hard to argue the reliability of a stock Glock 19. I’ve sent more snubs to S&W for repairs than I have Glocks.
Defects or breakage that require factory repair are one kind of failure, but how often do feeding and/or ejection failures occur on Glocks?
 
I've carried my 642 every day since 2005.
Got a little wear (I carried it in an 'Uncle Mikes' pocket holster for the 1st 10 years of it's life)
t3RFu8E.jpg

hLwqYfh.jpg

For the last few years I've been using a belt holster.
Not only has it helped reduced any wear but it's much more comfortable.

CvpuHCQ.jpg

Sorry, bench is a mess!!
 
Defects or breakage that require factory repair are one kind of failure, but how often do feeding and/or ejection failures occur on Glocks?

My experience with them, going back to '89 or '90, is ZERO. Never owned a Glock (must have had over a dozen, not counting my wife's guns) that had a factory defect and never had one break. That includes 9mms, 40 S&Ws, 10mms, and 45s. I taught civilian CCW training and qualification classes for 10 years after retiring. I never saw a Glock with a factory defect or breakage.

YMMV,
Dave
 
My experience with them, going back to '89 or '90, is ZERO. Never owned a Glock (must have had over a dozen, not counting my wife's guns) that had a factory defect and never had one break. That includes 9mms, 40 S&Ws, 10mms, and 45s. I taught civilian CCW training and qualification classes for 10 years after retiring. I never saw a Glock with a factory defect or breakage.

YMMV,
Dave
But be uglier than a mud fence
 
While I'm not a particular advocate of putting a defensive firearm within reach of, let alone against, an attacker ...

... if the action is that 'up-close', dynamic and frenetic, there are any number of other ways to distract someone from grasping, and maintaining a grasp, on your small revolver.

Anyway, I sometimes wonder if some folks who come up with such 'techniques' have ever actually been involved in a dynamic physical confrontation. ;)
Too much 'Hollywood' where the 'good guy' either holds the gun against the 'bad guys' back or the young lady has a gun and stands about a foot from the bad guy saying 'Stop or I will shoot'. Distance management and indecision will get you killed.
 
Too much 'Hollywood' where the 'good guy' either holds the gun against the 'bad guys' back or the young lady has a gun and stands about a foot from the bad guy saying 'Stop or I will shoot'. Distance management and indecision will get you killed.

I'd not necessarily disagree with you that people who watch TV/Movies may be unduly (unconsciously) influenced by the scripted and directed antics of actors. Not only when it comes to guns, knives or other weapons, either. Even as a younger martial arts practitioner I was continually amazed by the naivety of people who seemingly believed that scripted scenes had any relation to what happened - and what could happen - in real world conditions.

Not everyone mentally sees things unfold as they could/should. No shortage of folks who are subconsciously - or even intentionally - limited by the scope of their narrow expectations and beliefs. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top