1873 Winchester progress and range update

Status
Not open for further replies.

silicosys4

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
3,666
So I'm giving an update on the thread I posted here:

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/bought-an-antique1873-winchester.908077/

Its been an interesting few weeks, I took the rifle almost completely apart and cleaned 125 years of crud out of and off of the gun. It was pretty bad, by the time I was done I had a pile of crusty brown towels, but after cleaning and lubing, everything went back together and functioned properly. It does cycle much smoother now. The insides were in good condition, rust free and relatively unworn but with a patina covering everything.

I wanted to shoot it to see if it truly needed a reline in order to use cast lead. The bore looked pretty chewed up, and I wasn't confident it would bite and stabilize cast handloads.
Problem was, I couldn't find any .32-20. None. Zilch. There is literally no available .32-20 to be had online that I could find. Everybody locally looks at me like I'm crazy when I ask for it, and if they have even heard of it they haven't seen it in years. The owner of the shop I bought the rifle from knew what it was but his employees didn't and there was none in stock.

Ok, I reload, so I looked for cases and components. I found dies, shell plates, and projectiles but cases are nowhere to be found. I was able to backorder a few hundred cases but I have no idea when they will be available.

Dang. Complete roadblock.
In the meantime,
I installed a new front and rear sight on it because the original ones were pretty chewed up and unusable. Now mind you, I tapped them in to what looked to the naked eye to be centered, but that's it.
I found an original magazine tube cap as the original one was functional but pretty chewed up, and the new old one was...less chewed up.

In the earlier thread I was discussing sending it away for a reline and mechanical reconditioning, but I was lucky enough to reconnect with a semi retired local gunsmith that has done some work for me in the past, the real deal. He has a huge amount of experience with older firearms, and used to be a factory gunsmith for S&W. Walking into his workshop was a real treat, he makes cartridges for guns that are completely obsolete...and by "make", I mean in some cases he turns down brass bar stock to get cartridge cases that can't be found or made from other brass, and does a lot of case conversions. He swages his own bullets, which i'd never seen before, and he had some really cool stories about projects that he was working on, like a double barrel shotgun he turned into a double rifle...a 35-30 in fact, a wildcat 30-30 necked up to .35. He had a gunsmithing business open to the public, but closed a number of years ago and since he closed the shop i'd lost touch with him.

Anyways, back to the Winchester. He looked it over, said it looked fine to shoot, it functioned well enough to shoot, and by golly he had some .32-20 reloads and asked if I wanted to go function test it. So we drove out to a local gravel pit just to run a few rounds out. First shot I aimed at a paint can on the berm and wouldn't you know, hit it on the first shot. We shot it a few more times at the can just to make sure it fed out of the magazine and shot consistently.

The gun was as quiet as a .22lr, no hearing protection needed, cycled properly, and was sighted in at least somewhat, which was pretty dang good for newly installed irons. So I traded my gunsmith a pound of IMR 4064 and some cash for his time, and he was generous enough to give me a box of his reloads to test provided I return his brass. Suits me just fine, I have the excuse to go back and pick his brains a bit more that way.

Today I had the time to actually fire the gun in earnest, so to speak, and test for accuracy.

The loads he gave me were a 95 grain cast lead rnfp over 9.9gr of IMR 4227. Not what I'd load for the gun, but that's what I had, and I'm darn grateful for them.

I wasn't expecting much, and my bar was pretty low. Pretty please Lord, somewhere on paper and no keyholes. Thats it.

Set up at 15 yards and took three shots from a prone elbow rest

first shots 15 yards.jpg

Ok, thats pretty darn good for two freshly installed sights and a rough bore. I brought the rear sight up one notch,

Moved out to 40 yards, prone on elbows again, 5 shots

40 yard target 5 shots.jpg

Well, I guess I don't need a reline just yet.
I decided to stretch it, and go for 60 yards, but by this time the sun was behind the target, the wind was up, and my eyes aren't what they used to be. Still, I'm more than happy with the results and I think the gun is capable of doing better off a bench with a better rest 60 yards 5 shots.jpg
The blade front sight looks much better than the one that came on the gun (even though its new and unweathered), but dang does it disappear in anything but ideal light. I was lucky enough to find an original rear sight with the same patina as the gun, but I see why people replace them with peeps and such. Its not the best rear sight i've ever used, even after filing the notch a little deeper and wider. On a side note, the original rear sight had been cut down so short that it was hard to tell what it had been originally, and there are so many variations of Winchester rifle sights that I'm not even sure now if I found the right one, but it looks good and suits the rifle

new front sight.jpg

new semi buckhorn rear sight.jpg

Overall I just love this gun. Yea I know its cut down and not collectible, but boy is it fun to shoot and to be honest with you, I like how it looks even compared to an original sporting rifle. I like the carbine length octagon barrel, I like the dovetailed magazine tube hanger instead of the carbines barrel band, and the gun just personifies every western i've ever seen
I'm just bummed I have to wait 4-6 weeks to shoot it again. I finally found an online retailer, Custom Cartridges, who has all the components and will be able to send me some ammo...after they take care of their backlog.
Next step is to take some Murphys oil soap to the wood, Its pretty dark and grimy and I'm curious as to whats under there.
Anyways, thanks for looking.

rifle and backstop left side 2.jpg

rifle and backstop right side 2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Looks like you're on your way! Given the sight issues that isn't bad grouping.

As I recall, the muzzle looked pretty rough -- did you do anything to the crown before the range trip?

Couple suggestions:

I haven't tried this myself, but this dude recommends a different method for cleaning grungy wood. Haven't tried it myself yet:



Also, while it sounds bass-ackward, you could probably use shortened and resized 7.62 Russian Nagant brass in place of 32-20:

https://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?434501-Forming-32-20-(-32-WCF)-Brass

Grafs currently has Privi brass in stock:

https://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/77289

Some sight black might improve the picture for you:

https://www.amazon.com/Birchwood-Casey-Sight-Black-Aerosol/dp/B00AU67HDC
 
Last edited:
I’m a cowboy action shooter. Most folks use modern reproduction firearms, most of which are chambered for cartridges that either did not exist in the late 1800s (like .38 Special/.357 Magnum) or were not offered in the firearms as reproduced (as in .45 Colt in any rifle or in a Schofield revolver). None of this bothers me, but it’s also nice to see a revival of interest in some historic cartridges such as .44 Russian and the Winchester centerfire cartridges now known by numerical designations .44-40, .38-40 (actually a forty caliber) and .32-20. I see them in that descending order of popularity.

A friend of mine who mostly shoots real black powder in his ammo acquired a Uberti 1866 rifle in .32-20. I wasn’t even aware that Uberti had made anything in that chambering. It is a really neat rifle with a sound all its own.

Back in the day the 32-20 had a following as a hunting and defensive round. It showed up in Colt SAAs and in some DA revolvers.

Congrats on a good find. Order some brass from Starline.
 
Yea I know its cut down and not collectible,

Don't matter, heck with "collectability"!!!

What a nice project and beautiful rifle. I'm sure you have done the research, but is there not another cartridge case that can be re-formed to .32-20?
 
Looks like you're on your way! Given the sight issues that isn't bad grouping.

As I recall, the muzzle looked pretty rough -- did you do anything to the crown before the range trip?

No, I didn't touch the muzzle at all, I was waiting to see how it shot before trying anything.

Couple suggestions:

I haven't tried this myself, but this dude recommends a different method for cleaning grungy wood. Haven't tried it myself yet:



Thanks, I'll look into that, He does mention magic erasers are abrasive, so if the majority of the grime won't come out with soap and a soft cloth, that might be the ticket.


Also, while it sounds bass-ackward, you could probably use shortened and resized 7.62 Russian Nagant brass in place of 32-20:

https://castboolits.gunloads.com/showthread.php?434501-Forming-32-20-(-32-WCF)-Brass

Grafs currently has Privi brass in stock:

https://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/product/productId/77289

Some sight black might improve the picture for you:

https://www.amazon.com/Birchwood-Casey-Sight-Black-Aerosol/dp/B00AU67HDC

I saw that, I might have to try and pick some up if my backorder of .32-20 brass doesn't show up any time soon
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • bore 3.jpg
    bore 3.jpg
    57.5 KB · Views: 19
Also, while it sounds bass-ackward, you could probably use shortened and resized 7.62 Russian Nagant brass in place of 32-20:
I tried that, Dave. Doesn't work. The rim on the Nagant round is very thin, about half the thickness of a 32-20 rim. Since the cases are poked out from the front by the ejector rod, they don't need to be very strong. A Nagant case trimmed to the proper length would not headspace correctly in a 32-20 chamber because of that thin rim.
I saw that, I might have to try and pick some up if my backorder of .32-20 brass doesn't show up any time soon
Thanks
I got a better idea. Shoot me a PM with your address and Monday I'll send these to you for free. I have a habit of giving away things I no longer have a use for. Shipping is on me.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8524[1].JPG
    IMG_8524[1].JPG
    101.1 KB · Views: 43
Glad you got it and that it shoots pretty good for that bore being as gnarly as it looked. The ol girl looks nice all cleaned up!

I agree on the quietness... You should hear a 32-20 out of my 30" barrel. The original whisper caliber!
 
You should hear a 32-20 out of my 30" barrel. The original whisper caliber!
You got that right! I had a Baby Martini which would chamber 32-20s without modification, and it had a muted bark that didn't really require hearing protection. That was with factory rounds. In a strong rifle like the Martini you could approach .30 Carbine power levels.
 
I tried that, Dave. Doesn't work. The rim on the Nagant round is very thin, about half the thickness of a 32-20 rim. Since the cases are poked out from the front by the ejector rod, they don't need to be very strong. A Nagant case trimmed to the proper length would not headspace correctly in a 32-20 chamber because of that thin rim.

Good point and good to know that someone has tried it.

Sometime I'd like to try some PPU Nagant brass in a 32-20 revolver, just for the sake of due diligence. I've been looking at one of those Buckeye Special Ruger SAAs recently with .32 H&R and 32-20 cylinders.

BTW, about an hour ago I fired some shortened PPU Nagant brass through my 'new' 8mm 1892 French Ordnance Revolver. Actually some leftover loads I put together for my 7.5mm 1929 Swiss revolver. Worked pretty good with Lapua .32 HBWC bullets -- just fired 20 to test the theory and all the holes in the target were round and reasonably close together.
 
Ok, so a new development, I found out that with a slightly firm trigger pull I can drop the hammer from half cock. I know the trigger is extremely simple, only two parts, does anybody know which of these parts would cause this?
Well, if she has to come back apart that's not too big a deal, the second time will be a lot easier than the first.
 
Ok, so a new development, I found out that with a slightly firm trigger pull I can drop the hammer from half cock. I know the trigger is extremely simple, only two parts, does anybody know which of these parts would cause this?
Well, if she has to come back apart that's not too big a deal, the second time will be a lot easier than the first.

My guess would be that it's more likely the hammer than the sear, either due to gunk in the notch or that overhanging bit of metal having broken off.

1873Hammer.jpg
 
I’m a cowboy action shooter. Most folks use modern reproduction firearms, most of which are chambered for cartridges that either did not exist in the late 1800s (like .38 Special/.357 Magnum)…..

Actually, .38Spl. did exist in the late 1800’s, the very late 1800’s, it was released in 1898.

It was originally a black powder round.
 
Wasn't that the .38 Long Colt, using a heeled bullet? But I am not real knowledgeable concerning this.
 
Chopped or not, that's a grand old rifle that needed a good home.

Truth, and I don't see where the barrel being cut down a bit is of any concern whatsoever. Looks like a good job in the pics. Before I went the re-line route (which I think would be worth it in many respects) I'd give that muzzle a nice deep-crown. From the groups, looks like it will shoot good enough for most any purpose, other than serious small game hunting, or if you plan to use it as a backwoods/wilderness survival rifle. ? The 15 yard group (as is) tells me that with some lapping of the bore, as-mentioned muzzle crown, and some load development that you can certainly "knock over" a rabbit, squirrel, or grouse at that range, which is the distance I usually see them at.
 
So, i have a question... How do you know the barrel was cut down? The '73 came in any barrel length from 14" to 36", in 1" increments under 30" and 2" increments after 30". Also in round, octagon, and half-round profiles.

When i got the Cody Firearms letter for my '73, barrel length was not listed. Even though it was a special order 30" barrel and 30" magazine tube. So if done right, no one could ever tell if i were to foolishly cut some off.
 
Something else to consider, although the collectors would not agree, if the barrel was cut back in the day there is some historical significance there.

We have a rifle that's been in the family since 1846. The wife's family were real diary-keepers, and we know a lot of details concerning the rifle. After the Oregon trail adventure, the rifle went out with the militia that tried to track down participants in the Whitman "massacre", and chased the Indians around for about a year, and was in many of those skirmishes. At that time the rifle was cut down to make it easier to carry on horse back. The rifle also escorted Joe Meeks on his trip from Oregon back to Missouri, and then back to Oregon after Meeks continued on to Washington (DC). Would anyone say that lessened the value of that rifle? I think not. (yeah yeah, I know, "but that was DOCUMENTED") Who knows who cut the barrel on the '73, when, and why. Documented or not.

Not that that had anything to do with anything. o_O
 
Wasn't that the .38 Long Colt, using a heeled bullet? But I am not real knowledgeable concerning this.

Looking through my copy of Charles Sydam's book on US Cartridges, I think the .38 Colt cartridges with .375-.381" bullets began as heeled types. After the switch to .357" bullets, Colt .38s appear to all take internally lubed bullets. Colt seemed to like using multiple cartridge designations and recycling names.

If you really want to confuse yourself, look into the nomenclature history of the .41 Colt!
 
For 32-20 brass I'd post a WTB ad on the Cast Boolit site and the CAS sites. I'll nearly guarantee you'll find some at one of those sites. But if you don't find anything there, go to Gunbroker. 32-20 ammunition is priced $1.30 per round and up with brass at $1.00 each and up.

35W
 
If you really want to confuse yourself, look into the nomenclature history of the .41 Colt!

I wake up every morning confused enough as it is. I guess the question is, when was, or when did the .38 Long Colt family become, or was renamed the .38SPL. I saw a video on that somewhat lately, but I can't even remember why I just sat down at the computer again, when I was on my way outside. !!!! DANG!
 
I wake up every morning confused enough as it is. I guess the question is, when was, or when did the .38 Long Colt family become, or was renamed the .38SPL. I saw a video on that somewhat lately, but I can't even remember why I just sat down at the computer again, when I was on my way outside. !!!! DANG!

Short answer: 1898. Truthful answer: when S&W decided Colt was getting too much credit.

BTW, the current issue of Handloader magazine has a short piece on the history of the .38 Long Colt. https://www.handloadermagazine.com/cartridge-board-32
 
Cool. Yeah, saw a Mike B. video where he explained it all not too long ago, but long enough that I don't recall.

Yes, the gun companies used to play all sorts of name games with cartridge designations, so as not to speak the names of their rivals. Or have it stamped on their barrels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top