I’m already learning a lot. For example, I didn’t realize he only lived to be 47. people were dying left and right from consumption. (tuberculosis) He had quite a colorful family history too.With that dust jacket artwork it looks promising!! I’m eager to read your review.
You can tell I started to peel it off, but it wasn't going well and I jumped ship.There is a special place in Hell for people who put price tag stickers on the covers.
You can tell I started to peel it off, but it wasn't going well and I jumped ship.
There is a special place in Hell for people who put price tag stickers on the covers.
If it has a sticker on the dust jacket like mine does, you might be in for a bit of work, hehehe.Thanks,found a cheap used,as new copy for a friend's Christmas present......
If I remember correctly, as I have never seen a Collier pistol personally, the cylinder must be rotated manually, so it's not a "true revolver" in the modern sense of the word. Colt is recognized as the inventor of the simultaneous rotating of the cylinder and cocking of hammer with one motion (a "true" revolver), not with the invention of the revolving pistol/rifle/pepperbox itself.I would be interested to see if the book claims Colt invented the revolver, which he did not, or mentions that Colt probably saw one of the Flintlock revolvers produced by Elisha Haydon Collier while in London or Calcutta.
Do you have a tea kettle? Steam it off!You can tell I started to peel it off, but it wasn't going well and I jumped ship.
On the other hand, this book was originally $30, and I paid $2 + $5 shipping. (used from an Amazon seller)
We are in a golden age for inexpensive, easy-to-find "dead tree books".
Actually, what Colt invented was the bolt stop (which locks the cylinder with the firing chamber in alignment with the barrel.) He was inspired, according to his own story, by the clutch mechanism on the steering wheel of a sailing ship (he was a cabin boy,)If I remember correctly, as I have never seen a Collier pistol personally, the cylinder must be rotated manually, so it's not a "true revolver" in the modern sense of the word. Colt is recognized as the inventor of the simultaneous rotating of the cylinder and cocking of hammer with one motion (a "true" revolver), not with the invention of the revolving pistol/rifle/pepperbox itself.
Nope - read the patent. He claims, in his own words: "The principle of locking and turning the cylinder".Actually, what Colt invented was the bolt stop (which locks the cylinder with the firing chamber in alignment with the barrel.) He was inspired, according to his own story, by the clutch mechanism on the steering wheel of a sailing ship (he was a cabin boy,)
"The principle of locking and turning the cylinder."Nope - read the patent. He claims, in his own words: "The principle of locking and turning the cylinder".
And I'm saying the key invention was the bolt stop -- earlier revolvers, such as "pepper box revolvers" had rotating barrels.Vern, I'm trying to say that Colt invented both, not only the bolt stop.
Vern, contrary to the popular belief, there are no ground braking & shaking inventions in the firearms world, no huge steps were ever made - someone came up with some little improvement, someone else designed a different improvement, a third one came up with the idea to combine the two... Small steps, nothing extraordinary. If a guy thinks that a given firearm is something really innovative and never seen before, he simply did not "study his homework" enough.And I'm saying the key invention was the bolt stop -- earlier revolvers, such as "pepper box revolvers" had rotating barrels.
And my point stands -- previous revolvers lacked a mechanism to reliably align chamber and barrel. It was the invention of the bolt stop that made revolvers practical.Vern, contrary to the popular belief, there are no ground braking & shaking inventions in the firearms world, no huge steps were ever made - someone came up with some little improvement, someone else designed a different improvement, a third one came up with the idea to combine the two... Small steps, nothing extraordinary. If a guy thinks that a given firearm is something really innovative and never seen before, he simply did not "study his homework" enough.
P.S. I stand corrected about the Collier revolving pistols and rifles - as per the patent and at least some of the models, there is a clockwork mechanism to rotate the cylinder. Not a positive mechanical rotation like in a "real revolver", but still a mechanical rotation.
The Collier, mentioned by Driftwood, had such a (rudimentary, but working) mechanism - cylinder to barrel mating via a recess on the chamber. Nothing better than that, think about it - there is no way to misalign a chamber, which can happen with a separate cylinder locking mechanism, because the gun simply will not function.And my point stands -- previous revolvers lacked a mechanism to reliably align chamber and barrel.
Yet the device was not practical enough to make the Collier a success. Colts were wildly successful -- after the Mexican War.The Collier, mentioned by Driftwood, had such a (rudimentary, but working) mechanism - cylinder to barrel mating via a recess on the chamber. Nothing better than that, think about it - there is no way to misalign a chamber, which can happen with a separate cylinder locking mechanism, because the gun simply will not function.