Loads for "equivalent" bullets?

6.5 gr of True Blue

That’s a load for .327, not an, all be it stiff, .32 H&R Mag.
You asked about True Blue data, it's on their website.

Better questions get better answers, put a little effort into the opening post/question and give posters the variables they need to give you a well thought out (effort) answer. Don't feed it a tidbit at a time to frust5rated posters trying to help.
 
Has this thread reached a conclusion? Are charge recommendations for a 100 gr. Gold Dot applicable to a 100 gr. XTP ? The case is long enough where I don’t believe the small difference in bullets length will effect pressures significantly, i.e., there’s plenty of empty space in that case with 6 or 6.5 gr. of True Blue.

Probably start with a dozen 6.0 gr charges and dozen 6.1 gr charges and see how that works.

BTW, tried to find the bullet length of a 32 cal 100 gr Gold Dot but was unsuccessful. Does anyone know that?
 
Last edited:
You can find load data for Gold Dots here.

So your answer is YES.... But with the following caveats...

3) The 100gr TB data listed is from 5.0gr to 6.5gr with the Speer 100gr Gold Dot.

4) Hornady's 10th edition lists 3.5gr to 4.7gr using TB and their 100gr XTP bullet, part # 32070.

It’s on their website

As always, verify for yourself

I think your question has been answered. You can do what you want at the risk of hurting yourself or others around you. Or you can use the Hornady data for the .32 H&R 100gr XTP with True Blue.

It's your choice. I'm done responding on this thread.

chris
 
  • Like
Reactions: tightgroup tiger
Probably start with a dozen 6.0 gr charges and dozen 6.1 gr charges and see how that works.

1697228670162.jpeg
 
I think your question has been answered. You can do what you want at the risk of hurting yourself or others around you. Or you can use the Hornady data for the .32 H&R 100gr XTP with True Blue.

It's your choice. I'm done responding on this thread.

chris
Obviously you did NOT read that article linked to above. Those charge recommendations you referenced are for weak H&R revolvers. The WHOLE purpose of the article was to develop 32 H&R +P loads. READ THE ARTICLE BEFORE COMMENTING!
 
years ago I used the bullet manufactures books for the bullets I bought. Then I started casting with lyman molds and bought those books. Didn't need to think just read the specs. Like building an engine. Or rebuilding shocks.
 
All I can say is that I once asked Starline’s ballistician if a load published in Handloader Magazine was safe and he replied: If it’s published in Handloader Magazine, yes, we would consider that a safe load.
 
Obviously you did NOT read that article linked to above. Those charge recommendations you referenced are for weak H&R revolvers. The WHOLE purpose of the article was to develop 32 H&R +P loads. READ THE ARTICLE BEFORE COMMENTING!
I wouldn’t be fussing too bad when you didn’t put a lot of effort into/fully explain your question in the opening post.

You’ve gotten good advice.

Western Powders .32 Mag loads are going to be perfectly safe in a .327, so if you haven’t reached the power level you want at max .32 Mag data you have some room to go further being careful. A chronograph would be a big help there. Watch velocity and stay away from top .327 velocities and you should be ok. Working up slowly of course.
 
What I’m trying to do is develop a 1st class self defense round for my 327 Ruger LCR. Full house 327 rounds are way too much for a 17 oz. wheelgun.

And yes, I’m basing a lot of what I’m doing on

.32 H&R Magnum (Pet Loads)

 
I wouldn’t be fussing too bad when you didn’t put a lot of effort into/fully explain your question in the opening post.

You’ve gotten good advice.

Western Powders .32 Mag loads are going to be perfectly safe in a .327, so if you haven’t reached the power level you want at max .32 Mag data you have some room to go further being careful. A chronograph would be a big help there. Watch velocity and stay away from top .327 velocities and you should be ok. Working up slowly of course.
“Working up slowly of course.” … ABSOLUTELY!
 
Have you by chance read this thread?

 
Have you by chance read this thread?

No, I have not but I’m always willing to be schooled.
 
The XTP is a jacketed bullet. The Gold Dot is a plated bullet, but the plating is so thick that it may as well be jacketed.

So your answer is YES.... But with the following caveats...
1) First, look around for a Speer manual if you intend to shoot GD bullets on a regular basis.
2) If you cannot do suggestion #1, then begin your load testing for 100gr Gold Dots at the listed
Starting Load for 100gr XTP and work up in small increments.

Understanding the Concept

* As long as the powder, bullet weight AND bullet material basically agree, starting over at the Starting Load makes any differences in primers, barrel length or bullet bearing area work themselves out.
* In such instances, using a chronograph would definitely add a layer of safety. Use the velocity shown for Max Load in the XTP data as your "do not exceed" maximum velocity for the Gold Dot.
* The focus for everything you change is, as always, the Chamber Pressure. The new bullet won't remove your fingers or blind you, but the Chamber Pressure might. Thus, everything we do in reloading is to control Chamber Pressure. We cannot directly measure Chamber Pressure in the field, but we can gain valuable insight by knowing the bullet's velocity. We can assume that bullets of the same weight and velocity have been pushed by approximately the same Chamber Pressure.

Hope this helps.
Excellent reply! Good information!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Walkalong