Honestly I would take my chances with exploding planes.
You could also be stabbed by a mugger, struck by lightning, die in a car crash, or die in any number of tragic ways. Living at liberty is not guaranteed to be safe. Your questions, therefore, make no sense. If I was about to die in a car wreck, and you stopped time to ask me if government should have forced all car manufacturers to make car bodies out of three inch thick tempered steel, I'd probably say yes. When you are about to die, you are only thinking of staying alive, AT ANY COST. We cannot make our laws based on what people who are about to die might like.It's 9-11-01. You're on the 101st floor of WTC. You're getting barbecued in the fuel heat and smoke.
Wonder if you'd feel the same if you were there, or if you wife or kids were there.
Uncompromised liberty is where I would draw the line. By the way, the definition of liberty (when discussing politics) is that state in which the government takes no actions which infringe upon your individual rights.It's real easy to have bravado at the keyboard.
While I'm not particularly interested in dumping all my rights, I'm wonder where the balancing point is
Uncompromised liberty is where I would draw the line. By the way, the definition of liberty (when discussing politics) is that state in which the government takes no actions which infringe upon your individual rights.
Hmmm, another quasi enforcement agency legislating through internal memo.
I don't think I can take the irony.Sam Adams is a little boy from Clairemont who loves fire engines. But the Transportation Security Administration associates his name with a potential terrorist.
Coming back into the U.S. was a nightmare! Forms to fill out, four or five checkpoints to go through.