Best scope for $100???

You normally get what you pay for, but I hear Nikon scopes are good.

I'm not sure what the model is, but it's a 4x40mm and it retails at your local wally world for 99 bucks.

I will probably be putting one on my enfield when christmas rolls around.

I'd spend a little more than the C-note and go for the Nikon "Buckmaster" scope. They are about $189.00 or so.

http://www.swfa.com/p-2548-bsa-3-12x40-air-rifle-scope.aspx
right now, this is the best, tough, hunting scope, bar none. that is , for under 100.

...................

You're joking right?

rangerruck you have to be joking right? I mean who the would put an air rifle scope on a REAL weapon regardless if it is good quality. I mean, you get what you pay for.

nope, not joking at all. the deal was , a good scope for under 100 bucks, air rifle scopes are built to take two way recoil, and if you spend 40 bucks on this, and smash it on a rock or tree, you didn't hurt you wallet. I could tell you I had a tasco varmint scope 6.24.42 , on a Parker hale 308, that didn't move zero in two years, and they cost right at 100 bucks, but most peeps would say," you don't put a varmint scope on a hunting rifle!" Mine worked fine.
if you look at the thread that says, 223; best twist for 50 grn bullet? I used that same model tasco varmint on that 223 for those groups, and I shoot the heck out of that rifle. Never loses zero, all controls very repeatable, up and down left and right on the scale, whenever I change bullets.

Uhm, the phrase "bar none" was interesting.

As far as 2 way recoil, yep you're right, but it's not like the 100 dollar centerfire rifle scopes are weak.

And I think we can trust him not to bang it on a rock or tree.

Basically, if youcan afford a 100 dollar scope, there's no point in buying something of lower quality just in case you "bang it on a rock or a tree"

Check out a Bushnell Banner. They've got a 6x24-40 or a 6x18-50 for $99 at Dick's.

I've got one on a Savage rifle and it's been flawless for who knows how many rounds.

Weaver K4.

Fixed power optics are inherently simpler (fewer lenses, fewer lense surfaces to coat, less mechanical wizardry) than variable power optics. This means that the materials and manufacture for each part in the fixed optic can be of a significantly higher cost/quality level compared to a variable scope of the same final selling price. Since there are fewer parts to divide the manufacturing costs between, each part can receive a higher lever of quality. Plus, optically speaking, fixed power optics tend to be of higher quality than zoom optics even when each internal part is afforded the same level of quality.

Weaver

Weaver K4 gets my vote as well. The Nikon Prostaffs are the cheapest variable I'd consider.

I had a 3-9x40 Bushnell Sportview I think it was. It never lost its zero, and the optics were good enough.

You can get a serviceable scope for $100.

I call dibs on the rock!

alright, alright, I think that's enough though. i'll quit messin with ya ranger, and I do see your point in going for the durable and cheaper optics

(hell, durable and cheap has been working for guns since forever, otherwise the mosin nagant and AK wouldn't be around)

Nikon Prostaff refurb on Ebay. I have purchased two- 1 is a 3-9x40 and the other is a 2-7x32. The 3-9 cost me $102 shipped and the 2-7 was $95 shipped. They look new, they work perfect and they are very clear/bright. Best deal going, by far.

Pop into your local gun shop. You might find something on sale. $100 is light for a decent scope. 'Used' isn't a bad word though. 4X40 is dandy for deer. 2.5x to 8x is a bit better, but a fixed magnification scope will do nicely.

Weaver K4 series hands down. A little over the budget at $125.


Nikon Prostaff is supurb for the money, I have a 4x. Optically it is very good for a $100 scope, but it is a rimfire model (50 yard parallax)...the centerfire versions are around $150 which begins to take you to the next category where you could get a NEW Burris FFII on Ebay for $140. There is a $125 prostaff for shotguns. Don't know how that would work out.


$100 as a limit is really impossible to get a decent centerfire scope. Under $100 and you're talking those blister-packed scopes, and for a .30-06. I wouldn't bother.

Best scope for UNDER $100

This one.

If I had $100 to spend I would scour the evilBay for a Burris, Leupold or old Weaver or old Redfield 2x, 2.5x, 3x or 4x. I picked up a practically new Burris 4x compact awhile back for exactly $100.

Burris and Leupold scopes are covered by a lifetime transferable warranty; providing you haven't literally abused it, they will fix or replace.

-------------------------------------------

http://ussliberty.org
http://ssunitedstates.org

For the less expensive stuff, I rather like japanese optics, like swift.

LAK has the right idea...

I have a few old Weavers and one old Redfield...and I love 'em...they are just as clear and gather just as much light as my Leupolds.

That being said...the new Weavers almost as good...quality is there and my 7-30 Waters does have a bit of kick so it can take some recoil...'course this is a pistol barrel...

D

Best Scope

May be the "Buckridge" (or Buck Ridge) scopes by Optronics. Probably Chinese but gets good reviews and has a 100% over the counter, no fault, no question, forever replacement by anyone selling them. Drop it in the creek, run over it, or simply don't like it, the dealer MUST hand you a new one with no questions. I've read they have the best warranty in the world, bar none, even Leupold. Not expensive - about $100. I think I'll try one next time. Also at gun shows look for the old Japanese Banner Bushnell scopes 1970's - 1980's vintage. I've read that the optics in them cannot be touched for $1,000 today. I recently purchased one (3x9 w/ bullet drop compensator) for $20 and it's much better than my Leupold MX 8 optically. I had one on a 30-06 way back in the 70's and the BDC really worked. Didn't realize how good a scope they were then. I'm having qualms about mounting the Bushnell on my .270 because the age and fog proofing etc. - but the scope looks like new and the optics are trully superb. Does anyone know if age causes the loss of sealing and fog water proof integrety?? Just my 2 cents and opinion.

Nikon Prostaff 3-9x40. $99 for a factory refurbished unit from SWFA's Samplelist. You won't find a better scope for $100. You wanted the best for that price, that is it.

http://www.samplelist.com/default.asp?display_num=10&mfg_selection=9&prod_type=1&hide_sold=false

For just a few bucks more..........

A new K4 is a great scope, and rugged as all getout.....Essex

I have had good luck with Simmons scopes as far as value for the dollar.

Fixed power optics are inherently simpler (fewer lenses, fewer lense surfaces to coat, less mechanical wizardry) than variable power optics. This means that the materials and manufacture for each part in the fixed optic can be of a significantly higher cost/quality level compared to a variable scope of the same final selling price. Since there are fewer parts to divide the manufacturing costs between, each part can receive a higher lever of quality.

Click to expand...

+1. If I only had $100 to spend on a scope, I wouldn't buy one until I saved up some more money. Personally, the only scope for less than $200 that I can recommend, is the Bushnell Elite 3200 10x40 Mildot.

Don