RPG Cow season in Cambodia.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Blackfork

Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2006
Messages
1,219
Location
East Texas
From the Washington Times:

PHNOM PENH, Cambodia -- Lan Kosal smiles wryly as he breaks down the cost of killing a cow with a rocket-propelled grenade launcher.
For $555, Mr. Lan, an arms merchant, says he will take a client to a remote field in the Cambodian countryside to obliterate a bovine with the Soviet-era armament designed to destroy tanks and cause mass casualties.
When many Cambodians earn less than a dollar a day, why is this grisly recreation that is popular among backpackers so expensive? "The real cost is the cow. You have to buy it before we let you kill it," Mr. Lan explains matter-of-factly.
Many tourists, in fact, aren't interested in firing bazookas at cows or tossing hand grenades at a flock of chickens, another ghoulish attraction offered at the firing range he manages just outside of the Cambodian capital.
Most come for the opportunity to fire a few dozen rounds from Cold War weapons like the Russian AK-47 or the U.S. counterinsurgency M-16 rifle, favorites the world over among the armies of developing countries, rebels and paramilitary groups.
Each is readily available for target practice and reasonably priced for firing ($30 for a 30-round clip) at the Kambol Shooting Range.
So are Uzis, Israeli weapons sold as submachine guns or automatic pistols, and an array of handguns, even a Thompson machine gun made famous as the weapon of choice among American gangsters during the heyday of Al Capone and prohibition. All manner of Kambol's firearms are listed on the range's neatly laminated "menu" from which the gun curious or arms enthusiasts can choose.
Mr. Lan's stockpile is a remnant of decades of conflict dating to World War II, when Japan occupied Cambodia, then a French colony. By the mid-1960s, Cambodia had allowed the North Vietnamese to set up bases within its territories, from which it carried out attacks on U.S.-backed South Vietnamese forces.
By the early 1970s, the tables had turned: Cambodia was now fighting communist North Vietnam and also combating communist Khmer Rouge guerrillas. In 1975, when the Khmer Rouge wrested control of the country and began a genocidal campaign and killed nearly 2 million people, the country was awash in weapons.
Now, some 30 years later, the weapons that shaped Cambodia's violent past have resurfaced at firing ranges such as Kambol and some others near Phnom Penh.
 
As long as he's making up the cost of the cow, ammunition, wear and tear on the equipment and a decent profit I don't see why not. And if some Rambo-wannabe has to make up for physical inadequacies real or imagined by shooting off explosives just so he can watch a cow go "boom" I suppose there shouldn't be a law against it. I wouldn't want to meet such a person much less shake hands with him, but hey, it's his money and his problem.
 
Pshaw. Like any of us wouldn't jump at the chance to shoot a bazooka at something, bovine or otherwise.
 
Live cow to hamburger, in just a few milliseconds. So do you put the cow on a giant sheet of plastic to get the burger? I like cow, but killing them in this fashion is simply a waste, we all know that.

But shooting an RPG would be a gas, I'm just not sure I'd whack a cow to do it. I'd rather dump it into a worthy vehicle like a Ford or any German Junk. :D ;)
 
I don't know what's in the explosive head of an PRG, but I sure don't want it spread all over my steak.

I'd rather kill it with a .45 and eat it, along with all my friends.
 
I have a hard time with "why is this grisly recreation that is popular among backpackers so expensive" - the article even says it's not that popular and 90% of the Southeast Asian/Pacific backpackers I've known were hippies (read: vegans/vegetarians or at least vega-sympathetic).

Sounds like he overcharges tourists to fire off a few mil-surp rounds but uses the grenade/RPG 'rides' as a hook for the media.
 
I can understand hunting. I can even understand trophy hunting even though it's a perverted evolutionary relic of something that was formerly useful - Thag good hunter. Thag get big mammoth. Thag so good Thag can even waste head. You want make babies with Thag?

But killing something just to watch it die in a particularly bloody and violent way? That's freakin' disgusting.
 
Interesting that stories like this will upset some Americans more than the stories about Pol Pot killing actual helpless Cambodian people 30 years ago.
 
Interesting that stories about technical changes in firearms laws will upset some people more than Nixon violating the Constitution.

You say it's not the same thing? The two don't have anything to do with each other?

I'd say you're absolutely right. And that part is exactly the same. Pol Pot has nothing to do with people willing to pay $500 to be bloodthirsty idiots. Unless of course you mean that anyone who is against this particular sadistic pleasure is a Commie who loves the Khmer Rouge.
 
nteresting that stories about technical changes in firearms laws will upset some people more than Nixon violating the Constitution.

Unfortunately, many technical changes in firearms laws DO violate the Constitution. In that sense, they upset me as much as Nixon or anyone else violating it.

Unless of course you mean that anyone who is against this particular sadistic pleasure is a Commie who loves the Khmer Rouge.

I'm sure the Communists would be displeased by the free enterprise aspects of it.
 
I'm not so sure I appreciate that kinda behavior. i was always taught about Safety, Respect for others(to include wildlife) and the cardinal rule of Taking game for the purpose of sustenance...

Maybe Grandpa was all wrong????
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top