Boston Legal (merged threads)

Status
Not open for further replies.
What kind of holster do (or would) you guys use when you wear a suit like that?

I wear a shoulder holster when I know I won't have my jacket off.

Problem is you are 100% committed to keeping the coat on at that point.
 
notice good finger control after the shots....right along side the guard where it belonged.I know Shatner is a horse/cowboy type guy..wonder if he's a shooter?
 
I loved it too but what’s with the 3 shots to the legs and foot.
I’d doubled tap him in center of the chest and been done with it.
Then there would have been at most two trials not three and if I’m lucky none.


The Ol’ man said, “Son, don’t brag to me about the long shot you made! Brag to me about how close you got!”
 
notice good finger control after the shots....right along side the guard where it belonged.I know Shatner is a horse/cowboy type guy..wonder if he's a shooter?
I was impressed by this too.
 
Okay

So I guess the question becomes "Is he one of the chosen (very) few who are allowed to CCW in Mass - to say nothing of Boston."

Be a bit more believable if the show was called "Houston/Atlanta/Miami etc Legal.

Heck, if I met that member of the 'crime watch' I wouldn't be in a suit but shorts and a t-shirt with my 642 (a SIG is a bit above my 'pay grade' - no pun intended :scrutiny:) and woulln't be aiming for his feet.

But i would certainly be HOUSTON Legal :evil:
 
In the episode, he did not have a permit. He ended up being charged for unlawfully carrying a weapon.








--------------------------Spoiler Highlight to see----------------------------------



The jury acquitted.
 
I don't watch it too much but I know the dude that produces it is a screamin' lib anti-gun howler.

This, I'll bet, is a lead up to a very anti-gun ending. Let's see what happens.
 
Yeah, the show has always been anti-gun, Denny Crane is a feeble-minded buffoon who ONLY does stupid things with guns, and uses his feeble-mindedness as a defense. At least Archie Bunker was in his right mind, he didn't have to go around repeating his own name so he wouldn't forget it.

He tortured the guy in the parking lot. His actions were NOT to stop the assailant's actions, they were to cause him as much pain as humanly imaginable. David E. Kelly & Co have set the cast to make it look like well-reasoned conservative arguments are only embraced by ancient amnesiac buffoons. Maybe that's true in Boston.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top