So whatta ya think og the Taurus 1911?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I bought one and liked it,Had a few fte early on when trying to work up loads for it.I heard about some issues people had so i brought it to my smith to check out and tune as needed He said it was a little rough inside so he squared up and sreightened up all the matting surfaces,and got my trigger pull lowered a bit.I have a little better than 3000 rnds through it now and I love it.Its real accurate and runs great.Will I buy another,probably not.It was my first 1911 and it will not be my last.now that Ive had one I want a better one aint that the way it is.
Bob.
 
good gun, had no problems great entry level, but...for a little more cash you could pick up an STI Spartan which is an excellent gun!
 
Ive had mine for a while now, I got it as a beater just to use and abuse and Its holding up great, better than I thought!
At first I was keeping track of my round count, I wanted to see how many rounds untill somthing if anything went wrong.
After a while and ALOT of shooting I lost track of the round cound but never had a single problem.
I use Chip McCormin shooting star magazines and at first mostly Winchester white box ammo then I got a deal on a case of Remington then I started reloading, thats when I started to really shoot this thing!
Cant think of a bad thing to say about it, Its as good or better than every other 1911 I ever had, no crap!
 
easyg, read the last 2 lines of post #15 and explain to me what you meant. You were quite specific and I don't think I lost anything in translation...
 
Personally, I'd spend $200 more and get a Colt XSE. You get a better gun and its American made. How are we gonna keep jobs in this country if people aren't willing to spend a little more to get something American made?
 
easyg, read the last 2 lines of post #15 and explain to me what you meant. You were quite specific and I don't think I lost anything in translation...

Okay, here are those last two lines from post #15....
I've shot too many high dollar guns to fall for the notion that "more $$$ means more reliable", or "more $$$ means more accurate", it just aint so.
In my experience this is 100% true.
And I meant just what I said...
Paying more for a gun does not mean that the gun will be more accurate or more reliable than a less expensive gun.
Price does not necessarily have any bearing on accuracy or reliability.

I really don't understand why you would feel insulted by those two lines?
:confused:
 
Those 2 lines weren't the insulting part but from there I drew the conclusion that you believe price doesn't matter and a cheap 1911 is the same as a more expensive 1911. You phrased this as a statement of fact - and it's simply your opinion.

Your second post with all the inuendo and talking down was the insulting part. Really don't care as opinions are like butt-holes - we all have them...
 
I bought one used a few months ago, it is my first 1911. I didn't want to spend a lot of money and thought for the price it has some nice features. I love mine and plan on doing some fun competitive shooting with it at my local gun club. I haven't had any real problems with it other then 1 failure to feed while shooting my first box of 50. That was with a Wilson Combat mag even. I like it, and would definitely recommend one to anyone.
 
Now, back to the original question. :)

I've had a Taurus PT 1911 (one that came with Crimson Trace laster) for 2 years now. Great gun! I love it. I am sure more expensive ones are a bit better, but for the price that I paid, I am very happy with it.

I wanted to "upgrade" to Kimber Crimson Carry, but I can't really see what I would gain by doing that. Mine works just as well as the friend's kimber crimson carry that I've shot.

If you are an expereinced 1911 user, I am sure you want more expensive ones, but if you are just starting up, it would be a great one for many years to come. We always want to upgrade :) and that does not make the last one you bought, crap. :)
 
When I was well into Hi-Fi sound equipment in my earlier days in the 60's and 70's I had a good friend (and a stinking rich one at that) who owned three top end hi-fi emporiums. I worked there on Saturdays just because I loved being around music and getting to listen to the best in amps, speakers and so on. Tony's shops ran on one basic priniciple and it was this ... if the listener (customer) couldn't hear the difference between a $4K set of speakers and a pair costing $400 don't try to give him your ears ... let him listen until he hears something that gives him the improvement in sound quality that he is looking for. Upgrading your sound system was a big thing back then during the glory days of super-fi and most shops were happy to sell people gear that had received great reviews in the rags whether or not they could actually hear any difference. Tony's stance was honest and a good lesson for everyone buying anything in their area of interest - upgrade what you already have ONLY if you HEAR a sound that's more pleasing and satisfying to you otherwise don't wase your money. Same in spades with guns ... if your present gun does what you want it to do, you're happy with it and there's nothing you'd like to improve about it why upgrade. When it's time to do that you'll know ... and you'll know exactly why.
 
For the price that Taurus had climbed to now, if I were looking to buy, I'd probably go for something else. At the time that I bought mine, they were great deals and a good intro into the 1911 arena. My blued one had to have the ambi-safety replaced, but other than that, it was mechanically a great gun. My only qualm was that the bluing is horrible. It wears very easily and I had to keep a nice sheen of oil on it or it would start to show rust. That was the only reason I traded it for the stainless. Now that I have the stainless, it's a perfect gun in my opinion, mechanically and cosmetically.
 
PT1911NRA.gif

Love my PT 1911 DT, so far it's had 9 different magazines from 4 different makers and several different brands of ammo, FMJ and JHP's through it and exactly 0 problems.

Not one jam, failure to fire or anything.
 
I have the blued PT1911 and love it.Its solidly built and tight.
Shoots much better groups than my G20 even with a 6" target barrel.That may be the shooter,but just means i shoot the 1911 better.There are many low priced 1911's on the market and all work great,as long as it has the option you want you should be happy with the results.
Be warned if you buy a Taurus be prepared to see it bashed to no end and you looked at differantly due to your choices.
Thier is only 1 known issue that plagues the PT1911 and that is the ambidextrious saftey can be junk and need replaced.$30 for the part and can be done yourself without a smith.
 
I've had one for a year and it has no problems. I have a good and experienced gun buddy who bought one and loves his.

Some people buy Fords, are happy with them, and bad mouth Chevy's.
Some people by Chevy's, are happy with them, and bad mouth Fords.
Each one has the potential to have problems and produce a lemon.
 
Last edited:
Too many mixed reviews. Do a search for "Taurus quality" or "Taurus problem". You will have a lot of reading to do.
Take your choice, take your chances.
 
cyclopsshooter:
IMHO its crap
Pure genius,ive been trying to sum the PT1911 up in just a few paragraphs yet you can do it with 3 words.

DasFriek:
Be warned if you buy a Taurus be prepared to see it bashed to no end and you looked at differantly due to your choices.

I stated that previously,now i know why.
Id only guess owning a good and reliable Hi-point may be a bit worse than the bias this gun gets.

Check a PT1911 out in person and decide for yourself,tear it down and check QC issues and tightness.Then compare it to other 1911's in the same price range.Plain and simple you get more gun with the PT1911 along with good reliability and great shooting.
 
mugsie,

For what it's worth. I bought my youngest son the PT-1911 for Christmas over 2 years ago. When I went to buy it, I told the sales person I wanted to inspect it before doing so. He knows me well and my knowledge/experience of the 1911. I detail stripped in front of him and found one very nicely built gun that had a few machining marks but nothing that would deter me from the gun. Everything was good and tight, as it should be. Once I reassembled the gun, I cycled it a few times and using a dummy round, found that it had a very cleanly breaking 4.2# trigger that had no takeup whatsoever. My only two complaint's of the gun were it's finish and the plastic grip panels. I replaced the grip panels with a nice set of Cocobolo checkered double diamond panels, and we have been looking at some other type of finish when this one rubs off too much.

My son has loved this gun and he and a couple of friends took it out in West Texas to a buddies place where they shot over 1000 rounds through it over a 3 day period. He had no problems with it. Both buddies now have a PT-1911 themselves. I know of two colleagues that also have them. One has the newsest stainless model with the accessory rail. Only one has decided to sell his and that was partly my fault. I let him shoot my Wilson Combat CQB and he wants one so he has sold the Taurus to his brother to help finance the gun.

I know that others have had their problems with Taurus products, but I and my colleagues, my son and his friends have all been very happy with our Taurus firearms.

Yes I would buy them again!!

bigmike45
 
I know that it is not a "true 1911" but, for the price of the taurus, I would but a Para SSP. It is single stack and single action and basically a 1911 platform. The only difference that I can see is, the feed ramp is attached to the barrel instead of the frame. I have shot kimbers, colts, springfields, wilsons, and the pt 1911. Some of them I could tell a huge difference in others not really. I love the stock trigger on my Para and would recomend that over the Taurus. Although, there is nothing wrong with the Taurus. Also out of all of those my favorite shooter was the Springfield TRP. If I had the money to spend on it, it would be on my hip as i typed this.
 
It's just as much of a "true 1911" as any other modern 1911 made these days. It is a mil-spec pistol so it is interchangeable, barrels, springs, firing pins, guide rods, etc. The only thing I can think that might be different are the sights.
 
i have the stainless. very nice gun. 3-4 thousand rounds with no problems.

i have a friend with all the pricey toys but his danny has never out shot my taurus.:what:

granted i can outshoot him with his own danny.:neener:

my taurus fits my hand better so i shoot it better.:cool:

most guns are way more accurate than 95 % of shooters, sure there are pos out there but imo taurus isnt one of them. i have three.

i hear the same crap about my stevens 200 rifles but have never been out shot with them either.:evil:

dont get me wrong, the danny is a georgous gun but i buy guns that fit me and i can shoot well not for prestige or resell. all my guns go to my boys--pos or damn nice.
 
mugsie: As sterling jumped in, that is spot on what I ment. The PT1911 will not let you down; it is a good gun. Its accuracy will be equal to or slightly better than most service grade guns (Beretta 92, Glock, XD, M&P, etc.), but it won't have such things as "Guaranteed to shoot 2.5" or better at 50 yard or your money back" guarantee that a 2.5-4K 1911 might have attached. It may also lack some of the polish that an expensive 1911 has such as a custom fitted trigger, polished internal parts, etc. It will instead just work, might have a hair of grit, the trigger might not be exactly like glass breaking, just really close, etc. Slight imperfections that unless you know what to look for, you won't really notice. All of which cost a pritty penny to expunge. As others have stated, you might also find some machine marks on the insides the PT1911 that in an expensive 1911 would have been polished away.

Will any of these affect the operation of the gun in any way? None what so ever! But, getting rid of those marks, and adding that extra bit of polish costs money, and the law of diminishing returns also rears its ugly head at some point.

Overall, the PT1911 is a definite "BUY" gun in my view. But, it is a service grade weapon, that cannot be realistically expected to meet or exceed that maximum mechanical absolute performance of a custom-fitted match grade weapon costing 5-8 as much.

Like ghoster said, for 95% of shooters, there will be no difference between the PT1911 and a custom 2.5k 1911 in terms of performance. Only 5% who are dedicated, or have a mechanical rest to lock the gun into will be able to tell a difference between the two.
 
It's always a typical snipe attack by people who hate Taurus. As you can see, nobody has supplied any evidence as to why the Taurus 1911 is "crap". So that speaks volumes in itself. All guns have lapses in QC and you can buy a lemon from any manufacturer. People just seem to really jump on the bandwagon if they have a defective Taurus. The bad apple spoils the bunch. I have a good feeling that most people commenting on the Taurus 1911 are actually just repeating something they've heard from others. There is a good amount of information available that shows the number of actual owners of the PT1911 are happy with the gun than those owning one that aren't/weren't happy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top