Spike's Tactical...Need Opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.

M&PVolk

Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
522
Have a chance to pick up a Spikes with the painted logo for around $800. It is a mid-length gas system on a Spike's lower. It seems to be pretty decent quality and everything is properly staked, m4 ramps, f marked front sight base, etc. The BCG is an M16 unit but didn't seem quite as well finished as the rest of the gun.

I would like to hear some opinions on Spike's quality as they compare to some of the other quality rifles out there. It seems like it would be a decent upgrade from a Bushmaster or DPMS, but I know nothing about their reputation for quality, accuracy, etc. It isn't as nice as a Daniel Defense or Noveske, but it seems like a good price.

Opinions?
 
Spike's is trying to be top tier. Their printed/claimed specs are all terrific. Comparing their prices to their specs, some people have inferred that they must be cutting corners somewhere or not really building to their advertised specifications. I have not seen any proof whatsoever for such a claim.

I actually just got a Spike's middy upper a few days ago, haven't had a chance to shoot it yet. On inspection it looks very good (edit; see post below). I expect it will be fully worth the $480 I paid for it. I believe you are right that it's not quite a DD or Noveske, although I'm judging only by their reputations, not side by side comparison. If you think the one you're looking at is a good deal, I'd say go for it.
 
Last edited:
I got a spikes middy upper a few months ago. it's worked great with reloads and cheap Tula ammo. I get fist-ish sized groups at 100 yds with a red dot and a sandbag. the guys over at ar15.com seem to be spikes fans. their pre-sale customer service was very good. I'm not an AR guy so I can't comment on it vs. the rest, and I havne't taken it apart, but it works well.
 
Is it that you have a chance to buy a used rifle for that? New ones go for around $850.

In any case, I've seen quite a few Spike's rifles and have used many of their parts in my builds. I haven't had any problems.
 
spikes is great, i had an issue once and the customer service was out of this world good. my m4 functions great and the finish is awesome. they are well worth the price. i would have paid a couple hundred more than i payed for mine.
 
Why did you have to use their customer service? What kind of accuracy do you get out of your gun? I'm not especially fond of the painted spider, but the gun itself certainly seems milspec. For a new midlength rifle, $800 seems like a good deal.
 
Spikes will be added to the new, latest chart. And it should be coming out soon. They are up there with the big boys. After they establish a name for themselves, look to see price increases.....soon, get em while they are hot.
 
My M4LE carbine has been great. The original upper that it came with was a lemon, but Spike's took care of it within the week. No problems since then. Highly recommended.
 
My M4LE carbine has been great. The original upper that it came with was a lemon, but Spike's took care of it within the week. No problems since then. Highly recommended.

What was wrong with it and how did Spikes take care of it for you? I'm having a hard time getting more than just specs offline, so I am leaning heavily on actual users for good info.
 
I bought a M4LE for my sons graduation and the thing has been flawless. It digests the cheap Tula steel and leaves the empties all in a neat pile. Definitely a great deal in my book.

Tim
 
My 16" middy has only ~800 rounds through it, but has not jammed once despite not being cleaned. Many of those rounds were Wolf in fact. It's been a great setup. I've heard a lot knock them because they're cheaper than some of the established makes, but their specs are strong and the proof I've seen has been sufficient. I've not read reports of any failures attributable to manufacturing defects.

It will take time to show whether they are among the best, or imitators. I lean towards the former at this point.
 
Why did you have to use their customer service? What kind of accuracy do you get out of your gun? I'm not especially fond of the painted spider, but the gun itself certainly seems milspec. For a new midlength rifle, $800 seems like a good deal.
Well my brand new complete ST-15 would jam after every 3 or 4 rounds. So i told them about it and they sent me a new upper for free with 2 day shipping at my request because i needed it by a certain date. the new upper has never had a problem, i dont know what i get for accuracy in moa terms, i shoot steel plates and dont formally zero. i just adjust as i am shooting till it hits every time. my m4 is not color filled so you dont have to get a red spider. I think it was the same thing that happend to zebol, just a lemon
 
Pretty good stuff from Spike's. I wear a ballcap with their logo regularly when out and about. I am using a Spike's lower on my competition rifle.
 
Z-Michigan wrote
Spike's is trying to be top tier. Their printed/claimed specs are all terrific. Comparing their prices to their specs, some people have inferred that they must be cutting corners somewhere or not really building to their advertised specifications. I have not seen any proof whatsoever for such a claim.

Since my posting of this original thread, I have done a lot more research on Spikes, and it would appear that your statement here is putting this problem mildly. Apparently, there is some sort of bad blood between Spikes and a prominent retailer, bad blood that has played itself out openly online.

From what I can tell, Spikes releases its product for less than everyone's current fav, BCM, which seemed to cast aspersions on whether or not they "cut corners" and engage in false advertising. It would seem that the assumption is that BCM is the best in the business and truly offers the lowest rates possible for a mil-spec product, making anyone else offering one for lower a fraud. Interesting.

As a result of this accusation, the owner of Spikes has posted all his mil-spec certifications online...something I understand to be quite rare. These are in plain view for anyone to read and scrutinize. My current understanding is that all of their rifles meet the "chart" requirements for mil-spec, and yet, despite this, they are still getting completely trashed by an entire segment of the internet on a well known forum.

I'm not sure how I feel about this company. Part of me wants to buy something from them just because of the scrutiny they receive, and if their specs are true, the black eye they are handing to every other manufacturer in the business with their pricing. The other part of me is skeptical due to the sheer voracity of the attacks leveled at them by others in the business.

What is really the truth here? Is Spikes an honest, good to go, high "chart" compliant gun or not? Are they life trusting worthy? Is the internet nonsense simple brand bashing, or is Spikes the fraud many would paint them out to be? I hate that gun snobbery and brand loyalties force me to ask questions like this instead of being able to just get some specifications and user experiences and call it good. I really hate gun elitism.
 
Volk that is not entirely true. I know the people you are talking about. They don't tend to care who makes a gun as long as it is quality. The problem has been 2 fold with Spikes.

1: A number of Trolls whenever the topic comes up. This tends to turn people off to the brand very quickly. This is of course no fault of the company themselves. Heck, one guy even posted claiming to be the owner and he was outed as being just another idiot.

2: They haven't really backed up the Data. A number of us asked for Proof of their claims of testing and materials they use. Some was given, others was not. When this was brought up a lot of people claim that all the pertinent data was given, however they have yet to provide proof. I could make a Gun out of pot metal and claim it was perfect. However if I am asked to back up that claim I would not be able to do it.

That being said I think Spikes makes a respectable weapon on Par with the M&P series of guns from Smith. What they haven't quite done is reach the level of BCM, DD, Noveske, Colt, etc. That doesn't make them a bad gun by any stretch and if someone wants to buy one I would not tell them it is a terrible choice. But the price isn't that much better than some guns out there that are proven to be better. And that is where the real issue comes in. You can get more gun for a tiny bit more money.
 
I took another look at the Spike's upper I bought last week, this time with bright daylight instead of electric light.

1) Not sure what I was thinking before as the carrier key staking is just about perfect in location, depth, and impingement on the bolts.
2) Overall I cannot find anything on the upper assembly or bolt group that looks imperfect in any significant or mechanical way. To the contrary, all the assembly points look clean and done just right.
3) As a purely cosmetic issue, there are some tiny dings, obviously pre-anodizing, in the left side of the receiver near the butt end. They could even be leftover forging marks. Apart from that the machining of the receiver appears better than some others I've looked at, and has no apparent defects or sloppiness.
4) The upper matched perfectly with two lowers I tried (Aero Precision and Charles Daly). This is how most uppers work, but I have a CMMG that is an unreasonably tight fit with most lowers I've tried it on.
 
Z,

I have seen some of those Certs before. The one I had not seen was the one claiming that every barrel is HP tested. Which was one of the big questions outstanding

As I have said before, spikes has come a long way. If they could get their fanboys in check I think they would make a lot of inroads with more serious shooters. I know it seems like a stupid reason to not be taken seriously, but honestly the deleted --<Sam> just gets old. And when there are other options it makes me want to go that way.

I have a bunch of Spikes lowers so it isn't like I hate the company.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the reply Azizza. I understand the questioning of Spike's I guess, but I found the demands on the company to prove their claims seemed a bit over the top. I haven't seen that kind of scrutiny directed at any of the other major manufacturers. Nevertheless, whether or not those criticisms were legitimate doesn't do much for the buyer looking at Spikes today.

As Z mentioned, Spikes does have HP testing on everything now, AFAIK. Your response was that the barrel cert was one of the final pieces of information needed to verify the milspec claim. Are there any other specs that are in doubt?

Additionally, you said they aren't at BCM or DD levels of quality. I agree on DD, but then, I haven't held any other AR that I thought met their standards of fit, finish, and detail. The BCM statement is a bit more interesting, though. It is pretty common knowledge that BCM puts far less emphasis on finish than on form, and their guns tend to be very good while their finer details are a bit lacking. If so, in what way do you feel Spike's comes up short of BCM? My inspection of the Spikes would seem to indicate solid quality throughout, but I would like to hear your viewpoint on the differences. Spikes certainly beats BCM in price.

The whole fanboy thing can certainly be annoying, but it seems a funny reason for a forum to shut down discussion about a brand name product. It would seem to be a sign of pure laziness on the part of mods refusing to do their job, or some kind of personal issue between the company and the members of said board. It all seems kind of childish to me. I find the fanboyism toward Colt and BCM irritating, but I don't beg for any Colt or BCM post to be closed or banned.

FWIW, I find haters far more annoying. I swear, an AR thread can't seem to go anywhere on any board without some kind of bash on Bushmaster, DPMS and Rock River. That gets REALLY tiring....
 
Volk, as I said, I am not trying to bash Spikes here, I don't think they are bad. I think they USED to be sub par. But so far they are proof to me that any company can make a good product if they choose to. Unless something comes up that puts question to the documentation they have provided then I am satisfied.


But I am REALLY curious as to where you think BCM comes up short?
BCM is considered currently to be one of the best manufactures, even slightly above DD. Although personally I am not sure there is any real difference in quality between DD and BCM. Heck the only thing I don't like about BCM is the roll mark on their lowers.

I was pretty torn on all the mess you are talking about on the other site. I am not a fan of overly zealous moderation... Irony there.... Anyway. But at the same time it really was getting out of hand. Every other thread that was popping up was someone trolling about spikes. Not asking a valid question, but trolling. They attempted to leave a couple valid threads up and they just got infested with those trolls. Finally the Mods got tired of it and took the only action they felt would keep the board on track. It isn't a casual firearms board like this one. It has a more focused purpose and they wanted to keep that. So I can see where they were coming from.

Finally, I am not sure if you are referring to me as a Hater or not... Yes I will often try to steer people away from DPMS, BM, Oly, and other lower grade manufactures, especially when their stated purpose is Self Defense. I am not a casual shooter anymore and my perspective has changed. So when someone asked about a serious gun I try to give them the best answer I can.

Anyway, we are way off track here. Spikes Tactical seems good to go now. Heck, maybe I will pick up one of their guns and run it through my next class just to see.
 
Not trying to refer to you as a hater at all, Azizza. Nor am I defending Spikes at all, either. I am more interested in what the truth is about the company so I can make an educated decision about whether or not they are a company I am interested in purchasing from. You seemed to have a little more opinion on the matter than I have gotten from most on the board, so I wanted to find out more from you. That's really all there is to that.

As far as my opinion of BCM, I do get a little tired of what I consider fanboy-ism for them as well, but it is that way for a lot of people's favorite brands. My thing with BCM is that while all the critical parts of the rifle are to specs, some of the polish can be a bit hit or miss, as I have found while researching their products. It is a minor detail, but worth noting. Where I really am not such a fan is their pricing and the way their uppers are priced. All price listings are without the BCG. That's OK, but when I hear people brag on their prices, I go to the site and configure and find they are a little lower on some things and quite a bit higher on others. I guess that only irritates me when people brag on them as the best way to get a good rifle cheap. Not true anymore. I can get a complete DDM4 from my local retailer for less than the cost of just the upper from BCM. Same is true for some rail systems and other odds and ends as well. Now, throw in a company like Spikes, who if their certs are to be believed, and BCM comes up even shorter in price. I don't hate BCM and I wouldn't belittle any of their products, just making some observations on them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top