Success with a .25-35 Winchester

Status
Not open for further replies.

Texas Colt

Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
629
Location
Central Texas
Earlier this year I added a .25-35 to my humble Winchester 94 collection. It is one of the guns built shortly before the New Haven plant closed. I spent early fall developing a handload for it using the Hornady 117 gr. jacketed RN bullet at 2300 fps (factory ammo, when you can fund it, is good for about 2100 fps).

While there is not a ton of info on the web about the old .25-35, there is enough to make you doubt its effectiveness. Comments of too light, too underpowered for deer are common. In all fairness, there are positive comments too.

Last week was my first opportunity to try the Winchester on a Texas whitetail. I connected with a doe at 60 yards. At the shot, the deer dropped in its tracks - DRT. I was thrilled. The Hornady bullet had obliterated both lungs and the wound channel was impressive.

Today I was back in the woods with the Winchester. At first light I had a good sized buck with a dorky 5 point rack feeding at 50 yards - a good cull buck. Since I use open sights, I waited what seemed like an eternity until it was light enough to get a clear sight picture. The buck turned broadside, the hammer on the Winchester fell, and the buck went down like it was hit with a hammer. Another DRT for the .25-35!

Needless to say, I am thrilled with the performance of this 116 year old cartridge. I'm sure it will see more action in the years to come.
 
You're obviously lying. Everyone knows you can't take the armor-plated deer we have today with anything less than a .300 Win Mag.
 
Yep, who would've thought you could take deer without a .300 SuperMondoMag.

Unfortunately, I don't have pics of the deer. I should have taken a pic of the lungs from that doe - they were pink mush kinda like a strawberry milkshake. I'll have to post some pics of the rifle when I get a chance.
 
I should have taken a pic of the lungs from that doe - they were pink mush kinda like a strawberry milkshake.

Thanks for ruining the strawberry milkshake I just made.....But congratulations on your doe anyway. It's amazing how much people underestimate some cartridges. Come to think of it, the last deer I took was with my car chambered in Honda Pilot. It's not exactly zippy (I think that shot was around 30mph) and I didn't see any visible penetration, but it was a DRT hit.
 
Congratulations!
I've long wondered about the effectiveness of this cartridge for deer, usually in its favor. I recall that COTW says something to the effect that it's only marginal for deer, but I wonder how can game be "marginally" dropped on the spot.
 
Congratulations!
I've long wondered about the effectiveness of this cartridge for deer, usually in its favor. I recall that COTW says something to the effect that it's only marginal for deer, but I wonder how can game be "marginally" dropped on the spot.

Sure it worked fine. On THIS deer. What makes a load marginal is that it might not work so well on the next or if the shot presentation is less than perfect. It's a question of what's probable, not what's possible.
 
My great Aunt Esther had a custom rifle that Uncle Alvin had made for her. It was a Remington 14 slide action carbine in 25 Remington. Stock and barrel were cut down for her to handle easily. She toppled many deer with it. To my knowledge, none got away.

Those oldy cartridges featured thin jacketed bullets for fast expansion. Moderate velocity bullets typically produce absolutely straight wound channels with no deviations.

Thank you for sharing.

TR
 
What makes a load marginal is that it might not work so well on the next or if the shot presentation is less than perfect. It's a question of what's probable, not what's possible.

One thing I learned from bow hunting is to have the patience to wait for the perfect broadside shot. The same methodology can be applied to hunting with light calibers. I wouldn't think of taking a shot with the 25-35 that exceeded a reasonable range or required penetration of dense bone to reach the vitals. But then, I wouldn't do that with a larger caliber either. It destroys too much meat.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top