tightgroup tiger
Member
Hondo,
I can't trust Unique in any of my 3 powder measures. I just loaded 100 327 fed mag today with unique and always measure unique on my digitol scale, after running the measure about 10 cycles or so I started weighing and measuring.
The first 8 or so were exceptable at .2 +or- , then I get a .5 which is .4 over my target max. I wound't use it without measuring every load as I have been doing. I am using an RCBS Uni-flow and set it for 2-3 tenths under my target weight and still end up dumping a lot of them back in the hopper for being over. It does the same in my Hornady and my Lee measures.
I like Unique but won't use it with out weighing every charge, and I'm not paying over $200.00 + for a Redding 10x to get it down to +or_ 1 tenths with variences.
Their are to many other powders out their that meter really well and work as good as Unique.
I can't trust Unique in any of my 3 powder measures. I just loaded 100 327 fed mag today with unique and always measure unique on my digitol scale, after running the measure about 10 cycles or so I started weighing and measuring.
The first 8 or so were exceptable at .2 +or- , then I get a .5 which is .4 over my target max. I wound't use it without measuring every load as I have been doing. I am using an RCBS Uni-flow and set it for 2-3 tenths under my target weight and still end up dumping a lot of them back in the hopper for being over. It does the same in my Hornady and my Lee measures.
I like Unique but won't use it with out weighing every charge, and I'm not paying over $200.00 + for a Redding 10x to get it down to +or_ 1 tenths with variences.
Their are to many other powders out their that meter really well and work as good as Unique.