Right. For tough guys like you, maybe. Something about the way you talk though, tells me you can't handle yourself without a firearm.
But that's a topic for another day.
Well, as someone who has worked with domestic violence groups at various times, I can tell you that I'm glad the check is on there. Will it stop all domestic violence? Of course, not. But what's wrong with making it harder for those scumbags?
Also, people really need to learn how hard and...
You seem to imply that a domestic violence background check doesn't make a difference at all in relation to the topic at hand.
What information can you provide that supports that?
I like how you pop up AFTER I say I'm done with the thread.
Where were you before? Anyway, I'm on the road right now, but as soon as I get in front of a real keyboard I'll deal with you.
Better hope the thread gets closed before then...
Nope. Not rehashing it. Read the thread, it's all there. This thread is past its useful lifecycle as far as I'm concerned.
No offense, but I don't have time for people who don't read or fact check or who deny reality, and then come at me with hearsay, propaganda, and garbage. Not you per se...
...There are things going on that you simply aren't seeing and, ultimately, some things are going to be impossible to stop.
However, what I find *interesting* is that the tactics that yield the greatest statistical odds of thwarting or reducing the severity of these attacks, have routinely been...
I can't answer that with 100% certainty. A lot of the techniques used aren't made public for obvious reason.
When you have time, take a look what is being done at Disney. State of the art.
Stoky,
You seem like a nice guy. I dig your avatar. I'm only playing with you.
Just do me a favor, fact check, fact check, fact check. A simple Google search will pull up dozens of links that show his name and what transpired that day.
Respectfully, it's not my job to prove a statement that someone else has made. His comment, he has to prove it to be true. I can disprove it, but let him prove it. That's how debates work.
Or just Google it ;)
Let's let RPZ plead his case. Let him articulate and prove (with hard evidence) his statement that check points "are futile."
Especially since these are the some of the methods used everywhere that matters for these types of attacks.
In your (incorrect) opinion. Those in the know, think differently.
Oh, and while you're here, about that Columbine comment...
You do realize that there was and armed guard there, right? Cop? With a gun? Kind of destroys the whole gun free zone argument you keep trying to push, doesn't it?
Did you read the whole thread? I've already expressed my point a few times now.
Can you articulate Double Naught's point above? If you can do that, then we can talk...
I like your suggestions, 9MMare and what you pointed out about ambushes.
Here's some of what has worked in other places:
I'm not going to pretend I have all the answers, but it depends on the type of threat. Some types of attacks I honestly don't think can be stopped, at least not without a...
There's always going to be soft targets. Airports, stadiums, concert arenas, etc. That is never going to change. Terrorists hit those locations because they contain large groups of people, not because people are unarmed. Airports have armed security, as do stadiums, and not to mention law...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.