Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

10/22 or Papoose??

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by tw1112, Dec 28, 2002.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tw1112

    tw1112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    So. Cal - Los Angeles
    Hi! Well I think it's time for me to buy a rifle. This will be my first and I will definitely be taking this to the range just to plink with. I have been looking at the Ruger 10/22 or the Marlin Papoose. Specifically I am looking at the Ruger K10/22-RPF which has the synthetic stock and stainless bbl so with both the marlin or 10/22, I will have the same look basically. If I am not sure when I can do some modifications to the 10/22, which should I go with? What are the pros and cons of each?
     
  2. Psssniper

    Psssniper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    600
    Location:
    PRK
    Personally I'd get the Ruger. There is an overabundance of aftermarket parts and upgrades and it's kinda fun to tinker with a cheap gun.
     
  3. sm

    sm member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    28,389
    Location:
    Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
    My experience has been with the Ruger. Deluxe stock, blued, 4x. (basically a blue and wood guy) Just had trigger smoothed and shot it. Accurate reliable. Use good ammo.

    Papoose,personally no experience. My gunsmith says they are fine and accurate, ideal if takedown is important.
     
  4. Mr. Hankey

    Mr. Hankey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    The Kommonwealth
    If you are eventually going to do some modifications, Go with the 10/22.

    There are a multitude of aftermarket accessories available for it.
     
  5. thumbtack

    thumbtack Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    647
    Location:
    Little Elm, TX.
    I am just going to repeat what has already been said, if you think you may every tinker with get the Ruger. I have one and it is fun.
     
  6. MAKOwner

    MAKOwner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    682
    If you don't need a takedown gun don't get the papoose. Heck I'd get the 10/22 no matter what, lol. Trust me, even if you don't plan to do any mods right now, you'll be kicking yourself later if you don't get the 10/22. There is just everything you could ever want for them, and at one time or another you'll want something and not be able to get it/pay too much for it if you have some other model .22...
     
  7. PATH

    PATH Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,844
    Location:
    Rockland, New York
    Go with the Ruger. You won't be sorry!
     
  8. tw1112

    tw1112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    So. Cal - Los Angeles
    Thank you for all the responses! Anything wrong about the walmart 10/22's? I am going to go and check out rifles tomorrow and see what local gun shops have in stock.
     
  9. fal308

    fal308 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    Missouri
    I've got them both and like them both. The Papoose is a smaller dimensioned firearm. For many folks it's just a little too small. The nice part about the Papoose is that the takedown is very easy. Fits well in the floatable case also. If you don't need the takedown you could substitute the Marlin 70 series (795,7000,795SS). The Marlins have a last-shot hold open feature.
    My one Ruger wears a bottom-folder and a scope on it but even when it wore the factory wood it was larger. The other 10/22 in the safe is still as it came from the factory.
    If you're only going to get one, I'd go for the Ruger if you plan to accessorize it in the future, otherwise go for the one that best fits your ideals.
    http://www.marlinfirearms.com/firearms/selfLoading22wClipMag/index.htm
    http://www.ruger-firearms.com/rfrimfire_auto.html
     
  10. Spoonman

    Spoonman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    113
    Location:
    southwest GA
    It's hard to go wrong with the 10-22. There's a plethora of after-market products and it has Ruger reliability. My 10-22 is tough and reliable with decent ammo (Choate folding stock is the only modification). I haven't seen one in person but the Papoose is probably tough and reliable also (if my other Marlins are any indicator). When faced with tough choices like this, I generally try to obtain all the pertinent data and use logical reasoning to make the decision. Then I say "What the hell, they're both cheap. I'm buying both!" :D
     
  11. thumbtack

    thumbtack Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    647
    Location:
    Little Elm, TX.
    The WalMart 10/22s are the same as anywhere else just cheaper. With the money you save you should be able to get a couple thousand rounds.
     
  12. Kentucky Rifle

    Kentucky Rifle Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    1,416
    Location:
    Louisville, Ky.
    I wanted a take-down rifle that would easily fit behind the seats of my truck.

    So I bought the Papoose. It looks a LOT better than the Henry. Stainless steel barrel, weighs 3.25 lbs. chrome magazines are plentiful, and it comes in that nice foam case that floats. Put it in the back of the truck or on the fishing boat and when you get the urge to plink with a rifle you can unzip the case and put the Papoose together in about a minute. I love mine.

    KR
     
  13. tw1112

    tw1112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    So. Cal - Los Angeles
    This is probably a dumb question, but the 10/22's that I have seen so far are all tube fed...are there some that use mags?
     
  14. Camshaft

    Camshaft Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    29
    Location:
    huntsville, AL
    all 10/22's are rotary mag fed. no tubes.
     
  15. tw1112

    tw1112 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    61
    Location:
    So. Cal - Los Angeles
    Thanks for the clarification!
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page