115 grain vs 124 grain in a M&P shield

Joined
Dec 24, 2018
Messages
1,443
Location
Texas
Which one have people found works better in M&P shields? I know there is a preference towards 115 grain vs 124 based on reliability based on peoples specific handgun. I know my Glock can take either pretty well but the 115s didn't work well in my P38.
Is the Shield affected by this preference?
 
I've used 124 grain in my M&P 9 Full Size with no issues whatsoever. IMO, it shot better than 115.

Probably be a little too snappy for a Shield, though.
 
I shoot a lot of 115 gr FMJ practice ammo because it is usually cheaper and easier to find. But anytime I can get 124 gr FMJ practice ammo at a reasonable price I buy and use it.

For carry; HP+P 124 or 147 gr regardless of barrel length. Some may expand more than others, but I'll give up some expansion to get penetration. And the lighter bullets often over expand giving poor penetration. This is especially important if you have to shoot through heavy winter clothing or barriers.

I've never noted any difference in reliability with any of my pistols.
 
I do want to ask, what is the specific ballistic difference between the two? For most practical uses, I know there is hardly any. But there are slight advantages one does have over the other.

Also, what is the standard 9mm loading the military uses? out of curiousity. I know it's a +p loading now.
 
I’ve used 115 to 147 and haven’t had any issues in my shield. I find the poi to be about the same at 7 yds. 115s are cheaper typically, but the Winchester 147 hollow points (in the 50 round box) have worked well too.
 
I have shot 115 ,124 & 147 grain bullets with no problem. The 124’s hit closest to point of aim
 
Also, what is the standard 9mm loading the military uses?
Which military, as there are numerous 9mm NATO rounds in use, even in the US alone?
I know it's a +p loading now.
It depends.
The difference between 115 and 124 grain bullets is 9 grains, that corresponds to the size of a BB lead shot - do you really think that it makes such a difference? Maybe the handgun in question bears the problem, not the ammo...
 
The shorter the barrel, the lighter I like the bullets. Hollow points require a certain velocity to expand reliably, and in all the gel testing I have done, my experiences show lighter is better in short barrels MOST of the time, there will always be exceptions
147gr loses the least velocity when fired from shorter barrels. For example, Federal 147gr HST is listed at 1000 fps by Federal; it achieves 960 fps when fired in a G43, well within its expansion velocity performance envelope.
 
A matter of convenience and habit, I have been carrying Federal 9BP 115 JHP for a long time and found it reliable and accurate. Changing to something more modern would take a lot of shooting to be sure everything was as good with a 124 or 147.
I do load 124s for IDPA.
 
The general difference is if they learned to use 9x19 from the British, they use 115s. If they learned it from the Germans, 124s.

In the US we got a little of both (we preferred the 158 gr lrn 38 special or 230 gr 45 Auto during the era the 9x19 was becoming popular.
 
I doubt there is a big difference between 115 and 124gr rounds in a Shield, if so it is probably a quirk of the individual gun rather than S&W Shields generally.

Generally, I prefer 124gr 9mms in my handguns over 147gr or 115gr for defensive purposes, though I check through different gel test results for any individual loads I buy before I buy them since there can be quite a bit of variation from brand to brand and even line to line (say Federal HST vs. Federal Hydra Shok for instance). If one line's 115gr regularly performs better than the 124gr (which sometimes happens), I ignore what is "generally" the case. That said, generally, 115 will be driven faster, and sometimes with enough velocity that expansion interferes with the bullet's momentum enough that you don't get enough penetration while 124 generally can do both consistently. Though again, it depends from load to load, and I try to read over as many different gel test results as I can before I switch ammo (true in all calibers, but all the more important in 9mm and .38spl which rely so much on bullet design to be effective). The only other important criteria is how it works in your individual gun, if a bullet weight or a particular loading isn't accurate or reliable in your gun, obviously you should move on to something else.
 
Back
Top