1853 Enfield sling?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Olmontanaboy

Member
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
206
Location
Northeast for now
I notice on the 1853 Enfield that the sling swivels are attached to the front of the trigger guard and the barrel band right behind the muzzle. where they supposed to be carried muzzle down?
 
I believe ALL muskets of the day were slung from the trigger guard. My Springfiled rifle-musket is slung from trigger guard to middle band.
I never saw re-enactors carry theirs muzzle down though. Maybe a re-enactor will chime in here.
 
I do a fair bit of reenacting. Most of the time the guys carry their rifles muzzle down is to prevent rain from entering the barrel. Other times guys carry them that way is when they are not marching with the unit, but walinking about. It is easier to control the rifle from bopping the "lintel" of sutler's tents you may be going in and out of. I find it generally more comfortable to sling that way, but I am seldom offered the opportunity to do so.
 
Hello,

I am a reenactor and an avid Civil War amateur historian and aficianado. Carrying muzzle down is most certainly not in the regulations. In fact, "at the route step" allows the soldiers to carry their muskets anyway they desire and however it's comfortable as long as it's not muzzle down. It's expressly prohibited.

Soldiers were issued tompions (wooden plugs) to put in their barrels in case of rain or in the case of marching in the rain the order "secure arms" could be given where the musket is placed under your left arm, lock under your arm pit with the rifle upside down, that is the hammer pointed towards the ground, to keep it dry and the barrel pointed downward at about a 45 degree angle to keep rain out. That's as close to muzzle down as would be allowed.

All that being said, I'm sure soldiers did it anyway if it was comfortable and if their officers and NCOs were lax enough to allow it as many in all volunteer units were as long as you weren't loaded. Not saying it was common or encouraged although I'm sure somewhere and in different units soldiers did it even being against regulation.

Minie balls being undersized as they were, in a clean rifle, could and would shake out of the barrel if you carried it muzzle down. To avoid this of course drill stressed to never carry muzzle down. This was the whole advantage for the Cavalry with the development of breach loading weapons. Instead of carrying a muzzleloading musket with and undersize mine ball that would shake or slide out of the barrel while jostling and riding the breachloaders could load an oversize ball, tight fit that is, and powder charge behind it, close the block and have no worries of the loaded ball sliding out when your carbine was slung to your horse or you were carrying it one handed muzzle angled down.
 
Muzzle up. Look at Hardee or Casey Infantry Tactics.

BTW, what Phantom Captain says is right. On the march, no one cared.

Remember, during the American Civil War, firearm safety was never taught as part of the soldiers' instruction. Virtually every regimental history I have read and that's well over one hundred of them, or virtually every published diary, mentions a firearm accident.

That's why when that historian, Michael Bellesilles wrote that book that "debunked" the myth of armed America, one point he cited was that firearms accidents was because of unfamiliarity with guns. Bullsh*t! I've read about firearms related accidents even in sharpshooter units where the men had many years of experience with guns.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top