Certaindeaf
member
I hear you. I'd still take the grips off for the polishing though.
The satin brush is still there, but it's just a shinier version. I think I like that better than completely polished.
A few hours spent polishing in the wrong hands can quickly turn a $400-$500 sixgun into something not worth a plug nickel.I have seen plenty of guns devalued by over polishing.
Hmm lots of conflicting opinions. Wouldn't a light scrub of 2000 grain wet dry paper give me a better shine and lower the risk of damaging my gun?
Following up on my post, here are before and after pics of a Detonics CombatMaster and a Clark Meltdown Colt 1991A1 Compact that I had professionally polished/refinished. Like I said, if you really want a mirror finish you're better off paying for someone to do it right.You can have someone do it that knows how and has all of the stuff needed. I've had stainless guns polished to a mirror finish and a carbon steel gun polished then blued by a gunsmith I trust. The results were well worth the cost and the finish can be maintained using Flitz.
Hmm lots of conflicting opinions. Wouldn't a light scrub of 2000 grain wet dry paper give me a better shine and lower the risk of damaging my gun?
Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I despise the way Ruger finishes their stainless guns. The brushed finish guns have swirls going in every direction. FA's are okay because they're expertly polished in one direction. The polished Vaqueros are done in a tumbler and it's obvious.Nothing prettier than an unmarred, unpolished brushed stainless Ruger.
...nor do I want to drop $50 to get it professionally done