Given the crime rate in Texas that seems a prudent thing to do.Checked the Tx DPS and according to their statistics, and the number of sq. miles in my zip code, there were approximately 10 new CHLs per square mile issued in 2010. Gotta love Tx.
Just thought this was interesting.
Checked the Tx DPS and according to their statistics, and the number of sq. miles in my zip code, there were approximately 10 new CHLs per square mile issued in 2010. Gotta love Tx.
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/crime_records/chl/demoreportscy10.htmThat is interesting. Just what Tx DPS statistics tell you how many CHLs issued in a zip code are actually new? They do not have a section for new issuances per zip code in their section on issuances by zip code.
http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/crime_records/chl/demoreportscy10.htm
Coincidently, that's the number of deer per square mile in a nearby wildlife management area here.Checked the Tx DPS and according to their statistics, and the number of sq. miles in my zip code, there were approximately 10 new CHLs per square mile issued in 2010. Gotta love Tx.
Just thought this was interesting.
CHLB Reports Sorted By Zipcode:
Am I missing something? Having a Sr. moment?
Take the 2009 stats by zipcode and compare them to the 2010 stats.
What that won't get you is the actual true number of new-issue license, because some may be transferred addresses. I'd fall under one city's zipcode for 2009, and another zipcode for 2010.
Thanks. You got the point. New or renewed, thats a lot of CHL holders per square mile - in an upscale, low crime rate area (I don't actually know the crime rate but I get monthly e-mails from the city police rep for our HOA; typically not much goes on in our area).Kinda buzzkill. To perk it up a bit, new or not it makes me feel good to know more and more of my fellow Texans are getting OR renewing their CHL
Thanks. You got the point. New or renewed, thats a lot of CHL holders per square mile - in an upscale, low crime rate area (I don't actually know the crime rate but I get monthly e-mails from the city police rep for our HOA; typically not much goes on in our area).
Anyway, at least people are taking advantage.
I would certainly carry more but I can't have a firearm on my employers property - not illegal just a fire able offense. Sucks.And you have more than just your 10 per square mile because you have all those that got or renewed their CHLs in 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006 as well.
In the CHL classes I have taken and those where I have helped be a RSO, the classes are remarkably dominated by middle-aged to early retirement folks, predominately males, predominately overweight, middle class, upper middle class, and higher. My take on it is that you have people who have finally accumulated a certain amount of wealth and comfort in their lives, are physically slowing down, and wish to be able to keep what all they have and themselves safe. In other words, they are realizing that they are viable targets with waning physical prowess that isn't going to dissuade too many bad guys. Teddybear daddies and grand daddies just aren't the tough guys they once were.
Lots of folks, however, don't carry or don't carry regularly after getting their CHLs. Maybe only about 1/3 will carry daily. Some almost never carry and just have the CHL as an option. Maybe 10-20% will go to the range more than twice a year. In three different classes, I have seen students unload the carry ammo for their gun that turned out to be ammo they loaded in their gun after their last CHL qualification which was the last time they shot their gun. The guns are usually bone dry and I suggest that they lube them while they have them unloaded.