Outlaws
Member
I've run the long range ballistics on the .223 against the .22-250 and it's not much of a match-up. The heavy 80 grainer wouldn't work in my .223 (1:9" twist) or my .22-250 (1:12" twist) as they wouldn't get stablized. I believe the manuals and bullet mfg'r.s call for 1:7" or 1:8" for those heavys.
At 600 yds., the 80gr .243Win drops 45" compared to 71" for the 77gr. .223Rem and at 1000 yds. it's 244" to 382" respectively.
The wind correction is similar for the .223 compared to the .243; about 50% more correction for the .223
I wasn't able to find ballistics for an 80gr for the .22-250. Sorry.
Ya. I knew the 243 would outperform the 223 by a great deal. It was more to show that the 243 uses more powder and burns barrels faster than a 223 to gain all that performance, but the 204 is the opposite. The 204 gains a fair amount of performance while using less powder and without being a barrel burner at all.
The only thing the 223 offers for varmint hunting over the 204 is availability. But any decent gun shop or sporting mega store stocks it now, so that part is vanishing. Granted, I won't say it is readily available until Walmart carries it. So until then the 223 has some life left in it. That was a joke if anyone doesn't get it...