.22 Choices

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a weakness for .22 pistols. I learned to shoot with a Ruger .22 that belonged to my dad, and the very first pistol I ever purchased was a Ruger Mk II. My collection now includes those two pistols, plus a Ruger Single Six, a Colt Peacemaker 22, a Colt New Frontier 22 and a Kimber Rimfire Super.

My favorite of the bunch is the Kimber. It was expensive (about $900), but it's a work of art, is very accurate, and is an absolute joy to shoot. The Rimfire Supers are all assembled and test-fired by the Kimber Custom Shop. They are the exact same size as a .45 ACP 1911, but a fraction of the weight and with negligible recoil. The trigger on mine is as good as I've seen on an out-of-the-box autopistol. It breaks at just over 3 pounds, with only the slightest amount of creep. I've had pistols with professional trigger jobs that weren't as good. I don't know if Kimber still catalogues it, but the two-tone pistol pictured at the top of this page is a Rimfire Super: http://www.kimberamerica.com/rimfire.php

My Ruger autos are great, too. The Rugers are inexpensive, plenty accurate and as reliable as they come. The don't field strip very easily, however, and the triggers aren't the best. The Ruger is a highly developed platform, though, and you can turn a Ruger into anything your heart desires. The Mk II (and new Mk III) Rugers can be highly competitive in target competitions with a little tuning and the right aftermarket parts, if you decide to go that way.

In the revolvers, my favorite is the Colt New Frontier 22. It isn't made anymore, but they're a great value if you find a used one. They tend to be cheaper than the similar Peacemaker models. The only difference is that the New Frontiers have flat-topped frames with target-style adjustable sights (the Peacemakers have traditional thin blade fronts and a groove in the top strap for a rear sight). Both models are extremely well built. They are also quite a bit smaller and lighter than the Ruger Single Six, which makes them balance better, and they are easier for small hands to handle. My wife and kids love them, and so do I.
 
My Ruger MKII Govt. Competition is the second most accurate firearm I have ever owned, right behind a Tikka T3. Also, I don't recall ever having a malfunction with it.
 
.22lr

I like the Ruger MkII also. I have a 5.5 inch bull barrel and a SS slabside target model. Both are accurate and reliable to a fault if I clean them every ten bricks or so. I also have a Ruger OM single six that I had one chamber reamed for a .22 Magnum. This is usually my empty chamber that the hammer is lowered on. I need a little more umph, I load that chamber. I used to have a Colt Match Target I really liked, too. For just a plinker, I'd go with any of the Ruger semi-auto .22LRs. :)
 
Here's what I know/think about 22lr revolvers and pistols:

1) Ruger Single Six with 22lr and 22WMR cylinders 5-1/2" barrel -accurate, flexible ammunition types, small/easy to carry, cowboy type single action. Cons -small loading gate can be tough to load

2) Ruger Mk II series -accurate, cheap to shoot. Con tough to clean at first.

3) S&W model 17-3 (K-22) 6" barrel -fun to shoot, accurate, single or double action revolver Con: No longer made so could be pricey. S&W's current production is the 617 haven't tried it, it is pricey

4) S&W J frames/small frames -less expensive than the 617 I believe. Haven't tried them.

That Ruger Mk III (nre replacement to the Mk II series) with fluted barrels sounds like a good price for this area because it is the Hunter model. www.gunblast.com reviewed it several months ago and they liked it. You can probably find a MK II series for $225 on up for used to $275 or so for new.

-Jim
 
I've got a Ruger MKII Target in stainless with a 6 7/8" bbl with I don't know how many thousands of rounds through it. It functions flawlessly, as long as the chamber, boltface and breechface are kept clean (with a Hoppe's soaked q-tip, takes about 5 minutes). I regularly pop golfballs @ 25yds which for me is very good accuracy. IF you decide on a Ruger, get the target model, for the trigger alone. It makes a BIG difference.
 
not to sound like a jerk, but had you simply read your manual on how to properly put the MkII back together, I suspect the trip to the armory would have been unnecessary. That said, they aren't the most intuitive gun to dis/reassemble, and I suppose there is something to be said about that. I have am on my second MkII, the first was sold to my buddy so that I could buy a stainless version from my dad, and I will not be parting with this gun. I had a Browning Buckmark that I traded sometime ago, and to be fair, it was a very accurate, very good gun. It just comes down to the fact that I like my bull barrel Ruger better. What about the Beretta NEOS? I have held one, and I like it, and it has the added benefit of being versatility in that you can buy a carbine conversion kit from it. That said, I have never shot one and for all I know they are craptacular....
 
Mark III Hunter

I love my Mark III Hunter, shoots great and looks are awsom, I also have a Neos with Red Dot I like it but the trigger isn't where I want it even after tuning it up.
 
I love my Mark III Hunter, shoots great and looks are awsom,

What kind of holster do you use for this? Also, is it finiky with different types of ammo?
 
I have a Colt Frontier Scout for use with Super Colibris and a Colt Woodsman (First Series) that is very accurate out to about 20 yards.
 
I have a Ruger Mark III, have put thousands of rounds through it in the last year or so with no problems. Field stripping is easy, if you take the time to read the owners manual (and understand it) before starting.

Mike
 
I shoot a S&W 617 with a 8-3/8" full lug barrel. It shoots like a rifle, then again it should it weighs as much as one.
 
Jmurman,

Hey, I wanted to chime in again, since I have really become nothing but a Ruger apologist as of late, and tell you that with the exception of a faulty aftermarket plastic "ram-line" magazine (that actually worked really well for about 500 rounds), I feed everything through my MkII, and it generally works fine. With my old blued MkII, I went about 1500 rounds without cleaning anything but fingerprints off the metal, and I had maybe 3 FtE and no FtF. I personally can live with that. Now, keep in mind that I am talking about the older MkII models, NOT the MkIII models that are now about a year old or so. the MkII has a "heel-latch" magazine release. Some people, like my buddy Rockstar.Esq absolutly HATE this feature, whereas it doesn't bother me in the least. The new MkIII, in addition to having a loaded chamber indicator and, I think, a magazine disconnect, have a pushbutton style mag release. the 22/45 also has a pushbutton mag release. I would assume that the MkIII's work every bit as well as the MkII's did, but I can neither confirm nor deny this. Anyway man, you know, the thing is that even though I am defending Rugers pretty staunchly, I would say that its sort of hard to make a bad call buying a .22 autoloader from any of the big manufacturers, as in my experience they all work pretty well, and they all do about the same thing.

Timbo

(P. S.: Buy a Ruger....)
 
Oh, and incidentally guys, I have to say that I also shoot a H&R Sportsman 999, which is a break top revolver with a 9 shot cylinder, and I am shocked to not see more people talking about this revolver. I ended up selling my single-six off because this revolver is just a delight to shoot.
 
I had a 999 several years ago and foolishly traded it off on a deal.

I would gladly pick up another but they are pretty uncommon and I don't think they've been manufactured for many years.

Excellent product but not much use recommending a model the original poster is likely never to see other than used and possibly well used.

S-
 
OK so here is an update on the pistol situation.

I purchased a Ruger MK3 Hunter form JeepDriver at the ranger where I shoot.

Chad showed me how to field strip the pistol and I ran a couple of boxes of CCI Standard through it...definately a keeper! I should be able to pick it up on Sunday.

Now to find a holster and the cleaning stuff and.....you know that list goes on.
 
Seldfenz,

Your right that they are no longer made, and I think that sucks, as I would LOVE, LOVE, LOVE to have one of these revolvers in stainless. Maybe its just a regional thing, but I have never got the sense that they are scarce. I have seen oh, three or four in the last year, and all were in reasonable condition and all were under $200.00. Anyway, scarce or not, if you happen to run across one of these revolvers, I highly recommend them. By the way Seldfenz, if you regret that trade, I traded a Ruger No.1 in .270 straight across for my P90. I love my P90, but that was still a really, really stupid trade on my part. Ah, the follies of youth.

Timbo
 
I have a Browning Buck Mark Target that I love and would not give up for the world........but the guns P95Carry (alias Chris) has.....well I am truly jealous. :p Man those are some fine shootin irons buddy boy!!! Specially that S&W.

Chris, you also have a great technique of photographing them. :D
 
Mike - thank you Sir! :)

I cannot quite aspire to the heights of Don Hart or Oleg but - as long as pics please that's all that matters.

One of my shooting buds (caseydog here) got himself (and his wife) a Buckmark last year - they perform very well indeed and I daresay if I had not already got the 22/45, I'd have given one serious consideration.
 
JMurman,
Congratulations!! I hope that you enjoy your Mark III Hunter!! I bet that thing can't be beat. I'm sure that you'll have a lot of fun with it.

-Jim
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top