settle down, fellas... i'm only half serious. funny nobody had hurt feelings over calling the 250 grain barnes bullets useless...
yeah, i hunt - a lot. and i shoot - a lot. and i even have a 30-06. doesn't mean i necessarily like it, but i do have one, have shot several, and i do know what the cartridge is capable of.
lencac- hunting is my thing... an average year will net me about 3 whitetail bucks, 2 whitetail does and 1 mule buck and 1 mule doe, and 1 buck antelope and 1 doe antelope - just for big game. nevermind things like fox, coyote, badger, prairie dogs, etc. i spend a lot of time hunting, and even more shooting. if you want to argue near-perfect, you cannot discount the 338 win mag... tolerable recoil, flat trajectory, and more versatile than the 30-06. doesn't tear up a deer, flings prairie dogs 4 feet up, and will flatten an antelope.
cheyenne- i don't need to test fire one at my local range. i used to have 2 (remington 721 and 200th anniversary ruger 77), but now have one (the ruger) and i handload - and i thoroughly wring out my loads before using them for hunting - as far as 1000 yards if the rifle is capable of that sort of accuracy (i don't currently have a 30-06 that is capable of that, so mine stops at 600 yards).
anyway, loosen the shorts a little. some sarcasm isn't the end of the world.
however, i digress... the topic at hand was the 30-06 and 220's. and i reiterate that i don't think much of the combination, but know some folks love it.