I am not trying to start a 223 vs. 7.62x39 debate, but I have been looking at 223 ammo and the AR-15 and have a question.
Most people say that the 223 round is effective due to fragmentation, and that proper fragmentation depends on ammo. Is the cheap surplus ammo (wolf or equivalent) any good for defense? Does it fragment?
I have heard that Wolf Military Classic HP in 7.62x39 does expand reliably.
Would it be correct to say that the 223 vs. 7.62x39 (or 308) debate is similar to the 9mm vs. 45 debate? That is, many say that the 9mm is just as good as the 45 if you have the right bullet. Many say that the bullet is less important with 45s. Does the same thing apply to military rifle calibers?
Before I get told to stop being a cheapskate and buy the best 223 ammo out there, this question is purely academic. I'm just trying to understand the 223 a little better.
Most people say that the 223 round is effective due to fragmentation, and that proper fragmentation depends on ammo. Is the cheap surplus ammo (wolf or equivalent) any good for defense? Does it fragment?
I have heard that Wolf Military Classic HP in 7.62x39 does expand reliably.
Would it be correct to say that the 223 vs. 7.62x39 (or 308) debate is similar to the 9mm vs. 45 debate? That is, many say that the 9mm is just as good as the 45 if you have the right bullet. Many say that the bullet is less important with 45s. Does the same thing apply to military rifle calibers?
Before I get told to stop being a cheapskate and buy the best 223 ammo out there, this question is purely academic. I'm just trying to understand the 223 a little better.