Gordon
Member
I love the slightly slimmer and smaller (950 size) discontinued Model 20 D/A and prefer the .25 ACP version as they seem much more reliable .
I've thought of getting one because I don't have a .22 pocket pistol, it seems a natural caliber for such size, and I like the model.Thoughts on carrying a Beretta 21A Bobcat in .22LR?
View attachment 1045505
I have one of these on order and am thinking about making it my pocket gun. With the new .22LR defensive loads like Federal Punch, or even the classic loads like CCI Velocitor, it seems like 7+1 of .22LR would be nothing to sneeze at. I’d never volunteer to stand in front of one, and it beats the .45 left at home. And training ammo for it would be incredibly cheap compared to anything else.
Thoughts?
I've found mini mags to be almost 100% reliable (occasional malfunction), where many other brands of .22 LR failed far more in the same gun.Cool little guns. I have always liked them. Classy and well built.
Had one, traded it, kind of missed it and got another one later on. I don't consider mine a defense gun and would recommend a micro-.380 as a pocket rocket before one of these.
There are more satisfying and useful .22 handguns I would look into before these as a trainer, unless you are training to shoot said micro-.380 or some other small centerfire pocket gun.
Make absolutely sure it is vetted and fully reliable with the ammo of your choice before carrying. Mini Mags seem to do well for many folks. The hyper-velocity stuff is actually kind of hard on the gun, although I wouldn't hesitate to load up with it for defensive purposes. Keep it spotless. Good luck.
Truly, this is one of the most important points. People can pontificate about how anyone can carry full sized guns, or full powered micro guns. But the reality is that a lot of people, including myself, don't want to carry or find it uncomfortable to carry large handguns. For me, the largest I find comfortable and even then are borderline are a .38 snubbie, or my S&W Shield. These I can conceal, but at times aren't comfortable either depending on dress, weather, etc. I find though that a true pocket gun is far more likely to go with me everywhere. I'm currently looking for a micro .380. I have a Tomcat in .32, and that fits the bill for size too.The gun in your hand is more useful than the one you leave at home because it's too big to carry.
Truly, this is one of the most important points. People can pontificate about how anyone can carry full sized guns, or full powered micro guns. But the reality is that a lot of people, including myself, don't want to carry or find it uncomfortable to carry large handguns. For me, the largest I find comfortable and even then are borderline are a .38 snubbie, or my S&W Shield. These I can conceal, but at times aren't comfortable either depending on dress, weather, etc. I find though that a true pocket gun is far more likely to go with me everywhere. I'm currently looking for a micro .380. I have a Tomcat in .32, and that fits the bill for size too.
The other part of this is that a lot of people, especially relative beginners or the recoil averse, do not like even the recoil of many pocket snubbies or micro .380's (LCP, etc). Some people have health issues too that are relevant. Therefore, it's not always helpful when they are lectured about "manning up and you better carry at least a .380/.38 or more powerful." There needs to be a recognition of those who will likely only carry a small pistol, and who want relatively low recoil. That puts us into the mouse calibers. For those people, it's better they carry those than nothing at all.
I agree 100%. Full disclosure, my gun use 90% of the time for carry or HD is a service caliber, from 12 gauge shotgun at home and a full sized Glock to the aforementioned .38 snubbie and Shield in 9mm for carry. I do however carry occassionally a .32 ACP, and if I had a quality .22 pocket rocket, I'd not hesitate to take it to the store once in a while.You are 100% correct. Good post. There is a pretty huge hole in the market right now that happened when all the micro 380s took off and the larger manufacturers abandoned the 25 and 32. You also had the inexpensive 22/25/32 caliber zamak SNS type guns disappear. People make fun of those little pistols but they filled a role for a lot of people who just wanted a small caliber to carry. If someone were to bring back the Raven 25 or RG revolvers and build them with more modern materials for better durability and lighter weight with a low price point they would be popular. Right now if you want something in a small caliber people have to pony up the cash for niche guns that are either expensive or hard to find. There is a big market out there who just want an affordable pocket friendly emergency gun that they are comfortable shooting. They are not looking for shooting lessons or tactical training sessions. Hard to recommend a small pistol to a 55 year old woman with limited strength and weak wrists. There are a couple 22s here and there but I wouldnt ever recommend a silly rimfire for anything outside target shooting and small game hunting. Some people can get away with it because they practice all the time and are good at dealing with the retarded nature of rimfire but most folks are not doing that. Revolvers are a little better.
So "Man UP" and get yourself at least a 9mm with bonded ammo hollowpoint super duper jello destroyers. Also... Safeties are for shmucks and always carry a round in the chamber no matter what. Also make sure to keep your trigger around 3-4 pounds and have a tactile reset you can ride for faster follow up shots. Meanwhile the customer by the counter is 50% bodyfat and cant run 50 feet without tripping over themselves. Its a bit ridiculous. This broad brush gun market has created a stale industry and left a lot of people out. Last old lady I talked to who ....was dead set on getting a pistol ... had strength issues and arthritis. I told her to go down to Dunhams and get a little rough rider with a couple boxes of ammo and a cheap set of earplugs.
A gun that has some potential would be something like the Keltec P17 but they have to put out a version in 25acp along with the 22. LCP22 has potential as well in 25. Most of the pocket 380s would be better suited in 32 for the majority of shooters but also durability.
I'm currently looking for a micro .380.
I have quite a few .380s but for a softer shooting manageable recommendation take a look at the Remington RM380. It's aluminum framed double action with a true slide lock, a slide that is very easy to rack, mag release from both sides, slim with absolutely nothing to catch on clothing. With the flat base magazine I get a good two finger grip while with the magazine finger extension, I can get a full three finger grip. Capacity is 6 +1 rounds and it has shown itself to be very tolerant of ammo type or brand feeding everything I've tried flawlessly.
The flat base magazine is on the blue frame.
View attachment 1047459
I sure hope some company resurrects this design. Whether the Rorhbaugh original or the Remington version. For people that can use a true double action trigger, I haven't found a softer shooting pocket .380 yet.
The NAA Guardian was close, and fired a 380 necked down to 32... True DAO that took some practice with. Also came in 380, 32ACP, and 25NAA.
380 version
View attachment 1047476
I agree 100%. Full disclosure, my gun use 90% of the time for carry or HD is a service caliber, from 12 gauge shotgun at home and a full sized Glock to the aforementioned .38 snubbie and Shield in 9mm for carry. I do however carry occassionally a .32 ACP, and if I had a quality .22 pocket rocket, I'd not hesitate to take it to the store once in a while.
I think far too many conversations in the firearm community are binary and reductionist, and focus on the ideal. The realities of where people are at and what they are willing to carry or the degree of training they will engage in vary. Beyond some basic recommendations, or more if they ask directly, brow beating won't help. Is it not true that a vast majority of civilian encounters are ended just by presenting a gun? Then, out of the remaining percentage, a lot of incidents are also ended by any gun fire or strikes.
People will also say that mouse calibers often don't stop people quickly enough. I think that is true. But, even the mouse calibers can break bones or cause severe injury and pain immediately, let alone the psychological impact. Are knives or a baseball bat any better in an average person's hands? Probably worse than a mouse gun for the untrained, weak, or disabled. So, it's on a continuum. Instead of seeing mouse guns solely in the context of firearms, I think maybe it's more appropriate to see them in the continuum of all self defense options, and with that appraisal they may sit more fairly in the middle. Not the best not the worst, again for your average person.
This carries over to the round-in-chamber purists (for civilians, not LE/Military). The only proper way to own a gun is always carried, always round-in-chamber. This too is binary. One, owning a gun or even carrying one is more prepared than much of the population. Some people can't carry due to location or legal reasons. Many people don't have proper training and familiarity yet with firearms to not only feel comfortable with a no-safety, chambered firearm, but arguably shouldn't be carrying such for safety reasons.
As we get further and further down into the little guns, especially with someone who has little training or experience, I dont agree. These are not guns for beginners and/or the inexperienced. Very often, even experienced shooters dont do all the well with them.Something is "better than nothing"....
I've said this time and again when as a Firearm Instructor or as a private citizen don't "just drop something in my pocket 'cause I'm only going to the store". Carry a gun every time as if your life depended on it.As we get further and further down into the little guns, especially with someone who has little training or experience, I dont agree. These are not guns for beginners and/or the inexperienced. Very often, even experienced shooters dont do all the well with them.
I think a lot of those people who carry these things would be better off "without" the gun, as that way there is less chance they would do something stupid because they have it, and they actually think they are armed and prepared because they do. And no matter what the gun is, suggesting that they carry them unloaded just makes it even worse and no sense.
These types of guns are not "primary" guns, and many of them arent even good as a backup. Yet, they seem to be pushed pretty so hard on those who shouldnt be using them. And a lot of those people probably shouldn't carry a more realistic gun either. Just "having" a gun doesn't make you armed.
I think a lot of the problem here is, we have different levels of user/carrier knowledge and experience and the mentalities that go with it. The more the experience and training, the lower on the list the smaller guns go as a primary choice.
What Ive never understood too is, if I feel the need to take "a" gun with me to the store for a late-night run, why wouldn't it be the same gun I carry all day, and gives me the best chance at coming out ahead, should I need it? Makes no sense to me to do otherwise. If Im going to need it, Im going to need it, and Ill want the one that gives me the best shot at it.