22LR LRN vs plated?

Status
Not open for further replies.

MovedWest

Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2009
Messages
498
Location
Silicon Valley
I know for all my smallbore matches in school we used LRN rounds for competition in our 22LR rifles. That's just what we had and what we used.

I know copper plate minimizes leading in the barrel, but what are the down sides of using plated bullets for match shooting as opposed to lead? Apologies if this is common knowledge, but I sincerely don't know. Opinions?

-MW
 
what are the down sides of using plated bullets for match shooting as opposed to lead?

That's a good question but there are so many kinds of "matches" including "fun" matches that it really is an open ended question. There's light rifle, silhouette, falling plates, bowling pins, moving target, rapid fire pistol, bullseye, biathalon, prone, 3p & 4p and the list goes on.....

Sure, all of the "best" ammo is made with lead bullets. I suppose that "most" all plated bullets are higher velocity than standard velocity rounds too. So manufacturers have never really concentrated on making a plated match round. It just wouldn't be taken very seriously.
And I suppose that one reason is because plating will always be applied inconsistently with a variation in thickness. Even if that problem could be overcome, it would increase the cost verses sticking with the plain lead bullet and still, who would buy it?
And more often than not, plated bullets are made as less accurate hollowpoints.
There was one plated bullet that was touted for a long time as being among the most accurate fired from the stock Ruger 10/22's. That was the Winchester Dynapoint [HP] which chronographed as standard velocity or close to it depending on the test gun and batch, old verses new production Dynapoints etc...
Even the new Dynapoints may chronograph at less velocity than the Winchester T-22 target rounds which are loaded slightly hotter than many other standard velocity rounds [in the 1100's FPS range instead of sub-1100 FPS].
So then it's conceivable that for some types of matches, a favored plated round like the Dynapoint may be plenty accurate enough for some shooters.
I can say that I've bought some pretty expensive .22lr ammo. over the years that shot worse than anything I had ever accuracy tested before. I recall some ammo. specifically made for moving target and after testing it in my pistol, its accuracy sure made it seem like my bullseye was moving, but I can attest that the only thing that was moving was the point of the bullet impact!
Like the old adage, in the end it's the shooter that wins the matches. There may never be a plated bulllet to rival a non-plated bullet, but that doesn't mean that it's not possible, and accuracy requirements are always relative depending on the type of match, the guns used and the skill level of the shooters.
Some shooters are just so good that being forced to use a plated bullet may only be a minor handicap. :)
 
Last edited:
back when Winchester made the 'Wildcat' .22LR I was getting as good or better groups with it than the much-touted SuperX which basically the plated 'wildcat'.
same with the Federal 'lightning' round.
I tryed CCI pistol match in my pistols and AMT (.22rf) and didn't come close to SuperX.
why I have no idea.
I have had good results with Rem sub-sonic lead slugs from my AMT hvy bbl useing them for state-issued whitetail deer depradation permit use, basically 1 hole off a rest at 30'. I peck 'em in the head.
 
I used to try at least 10 different loads, whenever I got a new .22, and then bought as much as I could find of the same lot number of whatever was the most accurate. Every barrel seems to have its own likes and dislikes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top