Harve Curry said;
We should be able to agree that the first law of the land regarding firearms is this:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
Harve, did you have to take Civics or Government in order to graduate from high school? Do you remember what it said about the three branches of government?
The fact of the matter is, that until a court rules that a law is unconstitutional, that law has the same force as if it were part of the constitution. that's it, game over. That's how we do things under our form of government.
If you want the Second Amendment to be the first and only law of the land regarding firearms, you may; run for office, be elected, introduce legislation that repeals every gun law on the books, pass your law and lobby whoever is president to sign it, or pass it with enough votes to over ride a veto, or you may get appointed to the federal bench and begin ruling these laws unconstitutional as they cross your desk. You can violate these laws, get arrested and then you will have status to challenge them in court. The other option is to support political candidates who will do these things for you when they are in office.
Our system is set up to work that way. The police are not arbiters of what is constitutional and what isn't. That is the job of the courts. Discretion as I explained it exists.
That's as good as it gets. Live with it.
You have the tools to change things to be the way you'd like them to be, use them. I'm really sorry that they don't work faster. Many of us share in your frustration. But you have to attack the problem the right way. The police are not the problem. The legislature and the courts are the problem. And that is where the problem must be fixed.
Jeff