3:10 to Yuma

Status
Not open for further replies.

karnaaj

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2007
Messages
203
Location
Cincinnati, Oh
Since there is already one movie thread currently going I thought I'd start another by asking if anyone saw the rifle that the sharpshooter in Russel Crowe's gang was using? The first couple of times it was shown you couldn't identify it but at the end of the movie during the run to the train station it was obvious. It was a Colt revolving Rifle!!!!! With a scope mounted on it yet!!!! From my readings on the Civil War I always was under the impression that that particular gun was an abject failure.
 
Was it a failure or was it just not as good as leverguns?

I was thinking Colt made some revolving rifles with his original company pre-civil war.

By the way, did anyone catch the distance those shots were made at? I didn't think they were so far that a scope would be needed, just a good shot. I guess that is common with movies. They don't emphasize the shot distance unless it is some super duper big sniper rifle. They did that on the Russian sniper movie.
 
The thing I remember reading about those rifles was that many times you would pull the trigger and all six cylinders would go off at the same time. Soldiers were getting their hands blown off. They took to lowering the charging handle and holding the rifle by that just in case of multiple discharges.
 
The guy was wearing heavy covering on his arm that extended beyond the cylinder gap. I've always thought that if they redid those rifles into a cartridge rifle to reduce a lot of the bad parts (except for that cylinder gap).

It wasn't used at long range, just really precise shots in the movie. Notice how authentic (i.e. old and imperfect) the view through the scope looked? Nice touch, I thought.

Watch the special features on that DVD, if you have it. Informative stuff. Sounds like it was a legitimate Gatling on the back of that coach--no "hollywood magic" there.
 
The revolvers that would fire all rounds with one trigger pull were generally the black powder models, not the later models that used metallic cartridges. Even with the black powder revolvers, many people were loading them with paper cartridges that held the powder and ball in place rather than using loose powder from a powder measure. Then the shooter would poke a small hole in the back of each paper cartridge before placing percussion caps over the nipples. The paper that contained the powder and ball was meant to burn up almost completely when the powder ignited, leaving the chamber empty after firing. Generally with these designs, the percussion cap spark and the powder ignition would not cause the adjacent chambers to fire. I know plenty of people who are using modern replicas of the old black powder revolvers that are basically identical in design and function to the originals, and none of them to my knowledge worry about multiple simultaneous discharges.

The black powder "revolvers" that were most prone to firing off every round simultaneously were the multi-barreled pepperbox designs. The unexpected discharge and recoil of six or more rounds firing at the same time could indeed damage the weapon or the shooter's hand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top