I think you will find the 300Blk to be lots of fun.
Sorry but a spread sheet doesn't copy/past well.
Cal Bullet B-weight Powder P-weight M-Velocity weapon OAL
300 V-Max 110 H110 18.5 2160 DSA 2.000in
300 V-Max 110 H110 19 2302 DSA 2.000in
300 V-Max 110 H110 19 2267.75 DSA 2.065in
300 V-Max 110 H110 19.5 2271 DSA 2.000in
300 V-Max 110 H110 20 2240 DSA 2.000in
16 inch barrel, standard carbine gas and buffer. I have no idea what the gas port size is, what ever DSA was using at the time.
All of the normal warnings about non-standard loading information and always think before you leap. Look for valid known resources. I'm just some crazy old fat guy that sits in the sun at a pick nick table shooting.
Added this:
At the beginning of your message, insert in BOLD type a no-uncertain-terms cautionary note, for example:
CAUTION: The following post includes loading data beyond currently published maximums for this cartridge. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. Neither the writer, The High Road, nor the staff of THR assume any liability for any damage or injury resulting from use of this information.
I keep a running listing of all of my loads and those with multiple tests are averaged, thus the entry with X.75 FPS. Also I have standardized with the bullet/powder combination listed to 19.0 grains of H110 for 2302.0 FPS with OAL of 2.000 inches. And no it is an anomaly to get less velocity with greater charges of powder. But that's what the chronograph showed. (71 test shots with the 19.0 grains, 24 test shots with the 19.5 grains, 22 test shots with the 20.0 grains and 18 with the longer 19.0 grains) I don't consider it a valid average with less than 15 samples. Also, look at 'Lil'Gun', it runs well with heaver bullets (147/150 range for me) that are not maxed out.
Looking forward to your reports.