Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

.308 powder questions

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by Centurian22, Oct 14, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Centurian22

    Centurian22 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,234
    Location:
    Maine
    I plan to start reloading for .308 hopefully around Christmas and I am starting to research powders and load recipies. The main purpose of my loads will be whitetail deer hunting (150-300lb here in Maine and 10-300yards possible range) with some paper punching as well. I plan to buy 150gr and 165gr Sierra Soft Point Boat Tail Bullets, as these weights have worked well in factory loads for my gun. I plan to load in once fired (from my gun) federal brass, likely with CCI or possibly federal primers. My question on powders: I would like to try H335 as I have heard, being a ball powder, it meters much better than stick powders, but I seem to see many more references to Varget, h4895 and imr4895. I have also looked at prices and h335 seems cheaper. What are the negatives of h335 that I seem to be missing (if any)? Also any input you feel would be relevant to these specific loads (including tried load data) would be much appreciated.

    This is what I pulled from Hodgdon's site:

    165 GR. HDY SP Hodgdon H335 .308" 2.750"
    Gr- Fps- Pressure-
    Start: 39.0 2432 44,500 CUP
    Max: 42.0 2608 49,100 CUP

    150 GR. NOS E-TIP Hodgdon H335 .308" 2.800"
    Start: 40.4 2551 46,500 PSI
    Max: 43.4 2790 59,100 PSI

    150 GR. NOS BT Hodgdon H335 .308" 2.800"
    Start: 41.0 2619 42,600 CUP
    Max: 44.0 2787 51,200 CUP

    Only thing I've found in my research so far is that H335 has a faster burn rate than the others and seems to take up less volume. My concerns with those facts are will it be harder to find a 'pet' load because its faster, will the accuracy nodes be smaller/thinner? With it taking up less volume I know I'll have to be more vigilant about not over charging (I don't know if it would be possible to double charge?). Is there a possibility of reduced accuracy from not filling the case?

    Sorry for the overload of newbie questions.

    Thanks in advance!
     
  2. blarby

    blarby Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    5,144
    Location:
    Calapooia Oregon
    Given your atrocious swings in temperature all the way up there, I might suggest something other than h335.

    H4895 isn't a bad start- and is a great choice.

    Temperature sensitivity is probably going to be the biggest drawback you find in h335.

    A faster burn rate is not significantly better or worse than any other- but you are going to have to do accuracy testing at 80 degrees, and at your frigid morning temperatures in your area- and accept that those swings are both likely, and to be expected.
     
  3. Centurian22

    Centurian22 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,234
    Location:
    Maine
    Just the experienced info I was looking for! Thank you! As I have limited funds I don't want to have to explain to the wife why I have 4 partial 1lb (would seem like alot to her) containers of powder on the shelf but still need to buy more at $20-$30 a pop. Is the temperature sensitivity true of most ball powders or just specifically H335?
     
  4. joed

    joed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,160
    Location:
    Ohio
    I've owned a .308 for 7 years now and think it's a great cartridge though I did not like it in the beginning. I've learned one think about powders living in OH and hunting year round. You don't want a ball powder, they're to sensitive to temperature.

    When I tried Varget I was amazed that point of impact stayed the same through winter. So, I now use only Varget in .22-250 and .308.
     
  5. 45lcshooter

    45lcshooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2012
    Messages:
    919
    Location:
    Central of the Commonwealth of PA
    H335 is a good all around rifle powder. I use it in several of my rifles. In most of my rifles i started out with IMR4895, another good powder, just because thats what a friend recomendend. Middle weight loads to hot loads in the shorter rifle cases get a little full, with IMR4895. I load a few that way, but most hot loads are from H335.
     
  6. FROGO207

    FROGO207 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2008
    Messages:
    6,402
    Location:
    Mount Desert Island Maine
    Lately I have purchased a pile of surplus propellant. Both WC 844 and WC 846. The WC 844 is ALMOST the same as canister H335and the WC 846 is ALMOST the same as canister BLC-2. Some of the pull down propellant is slightly faster and some is slower than the canister ALMOST equivelent and a workup with a lower starting load is mandatory. The military specs out these for their ammo for use in all weather conditions with minimal problems. I do not use magnum primers with the ball propellant as some will recommend for cold temperatures, with good results. Pats reloading recommends using 40.5 grains of 846 with a 147 grain FMJ bullet as a starting load.
    So here are the military specs for your info and you can adjust within the commercial ones that are close for a guide. IIRC they were all the same OAL and it measured the same as a round I had on hand and I never measured it, I just use the LC surplus round to set my seater with when making equivalent ammo. IIRC 2.800"

    For 7.62X51

    M80 Ball
    149 grain FMJ
    46.0 grains WC846
    41.0 grains IMR4475
    41.5 grains IMR8183
    for 2750 FPS +/-30 50,000PSI

    M59 BALL
    150.5 grain FMJ
    46.0 grains WC846
    42.0 grains IMR4475
    for 2750 FPS +/- 30 50,000PSI

    M852 Match
    168 HPBT
    42.0 grains IMR4895
    for 2550 FPS +/- 30 50,000 PSI

    There is other data on this and other forums and from the military. Someone on here had posted a link to the military specs but I couldn't find it just now.
    The burn rate will not change so much that it will cause problems with finding a good load and if it at least fills the case 1/2 full you will easily see an over charge. The faster the burn rate the sharper the felt recoil produced is the biggest thing you will find. IMHO the military spent lots of money finding the best balance of components so I use their results as a guideline for my ammo experiments when I can.
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2012
  7. elwoodm

    elwoodm Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2011
    Messages:
    241
    Location:
    north carolina
    i would stick with varget or imr 4895 used this 335 in bigger rounds and found it needed mag primers. if you are using light weight bullets it works well but mid to heavy bullets need slower powders. make sure your sizing die isnt over sizing the case as most .308 dies have a tendency to do if you follow the directions that come with them. found this out the hard way after tossing 30 rnds of brass only fired twice.:banghead:
     
  8. helotaxi

    helotaxi Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,218
    Benchmark and IMR 8208XBR are worth a look with light bullets in .308 as well. I've gotten excellent accuracy with 8208 and 150gn BTs.
     
  9. nastynatesfish

    nastynatesfish Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2009
    Messages:
    964
    Location:
    Thatcher arizona
    I love H4895 with 168match bullets. I also like TAC
    My chart with 42gr h4895 out of a 24" barrel. This load was loaded in January and shot over the chrony in August. Same impact also
    815DA818-D000-4B71-9435-EC7FA8B17B15-46008-00000C60E144C137.gif
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2012
  10. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,212
    Location:
    Georgia
    Varget and Alliants RL 15 are the 2 that have proven to give me the best combination of speed and accuracy. Both are basically the same in both areas for me, but I settled on Varget for no paricular reason. Both are formulated to be very consistent over a wide range of temperatures which was a big sellling point for me. It can be well over 100 here during August and early September when working on loads. Temperatures in the teens, are very common during the late season in the mountains. Single digits are not unheard of.

    I tried 4895 with good results with 150's and 165's as well, but the temperature consistency got me looking at other powders.
     
  11. the count

    the count Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2010
    Messages:
    779
    Location:
    Anywhere, USA
    I have tried H335 and Varget in my Remington 700 in 308. Used several bullet weights. In essence I got the same results with both powders. As the price difference is in favor of 335 I am sticking with that. With my Hornady electronic powder dispenser 335 does not really meter well but thats ok.
     
  12. thomis

    thomis Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2009
    Messages:
    658
    Location:
    NC for a spell
    I'll throw in IMR4064
    This with the 150 grain Hornady boat-tail bullets (SST, I believe) are very accurate in my Model 70 Featherweight.
     
  13. popper

    popper Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    Messages:
    975
    8208, H4895, Varget will do the job. I don't use much 335 anymore. You might also consider a core-loc or flat nose bullet in a heavier weight. The advantage of the SSP is longer range - do you really think you will take 300 yd shots in Maine? Try powder Valley or other on-line sales - prices are less and the hazmat $ offsets the sales tax.
     
  14. Ky Larry

    Ky Larry Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,526
    Location:
    Ky
    I've owned several .308 rifles thru the years and currently have a CZ-550 Varmint in .308 Win. I've tried all the powders mentioned above and many more but I always go back to AA-4064 or IMR-4064.However, only your rifle can tell you what it likes. I've tried " ice cream loads," pet loads, and universal loads and they are all hog wash. You have to load and shoot different bullet-powder combos. There is no shortcut.
     
  15. GCBurner

    GCBurner Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,853
    One of the selling points of Varget powder is that it gives consistent velocity and pressure over a wide range of temperatures. I use it a lot here in Florida, for both .308 and .223.
     
  16. DanTheFarmer

    DanTheFarmer Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Messages:
    379
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    Hi Centurian22,

    I see you are from Maine. Yesterday I drove to Cabela's in Scarborough to buy 2 lbs. of Ramshot Hunter. This is a ball powder that is ADVERTISED to not be temperature sensative as ball powders are reputed to be.

    Speer load data typically calls for magnum primers when using ball powders in an effort to combat at least some undesireable cold weather characteristics.

    I don't have enough experience to say one way or the other if magnum primers with ball powders or using Hunter in cold weather works well. Anyone with experience on these issues?

    The ball powders are definitely easier to work with in my reloading set up but the proof is holes in paper (or white tail deer, moose, etc..).

    Dan
     
  17. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    I have had my best luck with Varget in 150gr, 44.5gr (COL 2.800") is my starting load and most accurate. My FN Winchester 70 is picky and likes 150gr Speer BTSP the best. Nickle sized groups is plenty good for a light weight hunting rifle.
     
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2012
  18. Centurian22

    Centurian22 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,234
    Location:
    Maine
    Wow Thank you everyone for your input and experience. Sounds like I'll just have to try a couple of the more popular powders (Varget seeming to have the edge) and see what works. I was hoping to start with something less expensive but as usual you get what you pay for. Saving a couple bucks (after spending several hundred on equipment) doesn't do any good if it doesn't go bang when I want it to or doesn't put holes where I point it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page