In the early 1980's, I shot IHMSA handgun silhouette. I shot production class with a 10" 357 Magnum Contender and revolver class with a 6" Model 19. With a 158 grain jacketed bullet loaded over a full power charge of W296, I had enough sight range to hit the 200 meter rounds with the appropriate sight adjustment. I found one load that was accurate in both guns. My scores were adequate for my skill level at the time. I was improving with practice and match shooting.
The 158 grain bullet was a but light for reliable knock downs of the 200 meter rams but it was not often. I'd get a knock down if i hit above the half high mark on the ram.
Recoil was manageable with little practice. Of course, the 10" Contender was a bit heavier than the 6" Smith and the Contender absorbed much of the recoil.
For full powder loads, I've not been as happy using IMR4227 or Alliant 2400. These powders do have their advantages but disadvantages as well.
As long as one works within the limits of reputable published reloading data for W296/H110, it is safe and versatile.
P.S. I have not tried any Accurate #9 to date.
The 158 grain bullet was a but light for reliable knock downs of the 200 meter rams but it was not often. I'd get a knock down if i hit above the half high mark on the ram.
Recoil was manageable with little practice. Of course, the 10" Contender was a bit heavier than the 6" Smith and the Contender absorbed much of the recoil.
For full powder loads, I've not been as happy using IMR4227 or Alliant 2400. These powders do have their advantages but disadvantages as well.
As long as one works within the limits of reputable published reloading data for W296/H110, it is safe and versatile.
P.S. I have not tried any Accurate #9 to date.
Last edited:
