hrgrisso
Member
First, I hope this is in the right area. I am unaware of an "ammo" questions section. If there is, Mods, please move it? Thanks.
Now to my question: I recently saw this on THR.
So I guess the real question is this. Why do some view the .357Sig this way? What do YOU feel is wrong with it? I like the idea of having a gun that has 10-16 rounds of .357 Mag power without having to reload.
I know that many people bring up over penetration. Others bring up "It doesn't match .357Mag performance in every load."
I believe there are logical and acceptable answers to each question brought up about this cool handgun. In my mind it's a modern equivilant of the 7.62x25. I love that power. Plus it's range is out past most others useful/accurate distance.
So what do you all think?
Now to my question: I recently saw this on THR.
and of course .357Sig is still an answer looking for a question (at least when saving your life is the concern at hand)
So I guess the real question is this. Why do some view the .357Sig this way? What do YOU feel is wrong with it? I like the idea of having a gun that has 10-16 rounds of .357 Mag power without having to reload.
I know that many people bring up over penetration. Others bring up "It doesn't match .357Mag performance in every load."
I believe there are logical and acceptable answers to each question brought up about this cool handgun. In my mind it's a modern equivilant of the 7.62x25. I love that power. Plus it's range is out past most others useful/accurate distance.
So what do you all think?