.40 Glock bulge on a .380?

Status
Not open for further replies.

fouled bore

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2015
Messages
215
Location
Southern Indiana
Picked up some brass at a public range and came across these .380 cases with a big bulge like the .40 Glocks have. .40 Glock is on the left, .380s on the right. What gun could this be coming from?
 

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1439749815083.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1439749815083.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 208
Definitely a glock firing pin strike on that 380.
Fwiw, my glock 23 Gen 3 doesn't bulge them nearly as bad as that pic. Maybe it is the pic exaggerating it.
 
I saw this back in the 80s on glock 19s by the the way does any body make peep sight for pistols thanks uther 888
 
.380 brass is thin, and Glock chambers tend to be kind of loose...which can result in some brass getting scary. I wonder how many reloads those are good for?
 
I am not going to reload them, they will be in the scrap with the .40 Glock brass. I just thought this was strange because I had only seen .40 with the bulge. I thought that only Glock .40s had the unsupported chambers.
 
I have a Glock G42 and they sure as heck don't look like that! Then again, I reload for a light recoil. If this was a reload, could it be an overcharge?
 
I've picked up some 380 range brass (not mine) that had the glock bulge. I have yet to figure out what gun causes that, but I have been suspecting the G42, since I have not seen this on any 380 brass until after the G42 came out.
 
I am starting to think it may have been some custom feed ramp work? Any way, it is really pushing the limit, there is one in the batch that is really bulged quite a lot. I am surprised at the amount of bulge and wondering how much more it would take to blow it out.
 
You might be right, the ones you have pictured have a much more pronounced bulge than anything I have seen. They look like they were very close to failure.
 
OK il fess up I put a 9mm rnd. in my G.40 gen 4 mod 23 thinking my conversion barell was in. After testing hundreds of 9mm rnds. prior it was and could have turned out really bad. Hit low left of poa the brass didn't eject and when I got it out it looked exactly like that brass. I cant figure on two diff. calibers in the pic thou? Don't beat me up to bad please.
 
OK il fess up I put a 9mm rnd. in my G.40 gen 4 mod 23 thinking my conversion barell was in. After testing hundreds of 9mm rnds. prior it was and could have turned out really bad. Hit low left of poa the brass didn't eject and when I got it out it looked exactly like that brass.

Lauderdale, I can't even imagine it making a primer strike. I would think it would be to far off center or slid too far up the barel.
 
Lauderdale, I can't even imagine it making a primer strike. I would think it would be to far off center or slid too far up the barel.

What happens is the round headspaces on the extractor, not the case mouth. On most semi-auto handguns, the case rim slides up under the extractor as the round is being chambered. Even though the head is a slightly different diameter between a 40 and a 9, they use the same shellholder, so they are close enough.
 
There are multiple documented cases of people firing 9mm in guns chambered for .40 and the same with .40 in a .45.
 
Im trying to think how the scenario plated out as the second 40 case looks like it has the same issue? correct? I can see someone possibly doing what I did but then again a second time and in what caliber gun? But polish job in two caliber guns would sound more wright if that's the issue? am i making any sense?
 
I've picked up some 380 range brass (not mine) that had the glock bulge. I have yet to figure out what gun causes that, but I have been suspecting the G42, since I have not seen this on any 380 brass until after the G42 came out.
Yeah I've started to see that too on 380 cases at the range. Started right about the time that new glock started showing up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top