4200 fps!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are some reports claiming 5,000+ fps using a .22BR. Wonder what the barrel life on that would be?
 
I would call what I do a "partial full length resize" with the .22-250. My procedure is to set the die so that closing the bolt requires a fair amount of effort. This results in minimal extra headspace, which in turn results in minimal growth in length and minimal thinning in front of the web, and a longer case life.

When I reload for big game hunting rounds, like .270, .308, and .338, I full length size so the bolt closes easily in case I need a quick second shot. You get fewer loadings before the casing wears out, but that is not a big consideration for hunting. I also size for semi-automatics this way. They just don't have the camming action necessary to chamber a minimally sized casing.
 
It would be neat to approach the mile per second mark. Not because it would be practical, but just to do it.

And to further actually travel a mile in one second... velocity at the muzzle would have to be much higher than just 5,280 fps. I'm guessing maybe in the 7,000 fps range.
 
It would be neat to approach the mile per second mark. Not because it would be practical, but just to do it. And to further actually travel a mile in one second... velocity at the muzzle would have to be much higher than just 5,280 fps. I'm guessing maybe in the 7,000 fps range.

I like the way you think! According to the ballistic calculator on my phone (Strelok) if you use a 40gn hornady it needs about 11500 fps to reach a mile in one second. It has 88 inches of drop (~5moa) at a mile below a 100yd zero.
 
if you use a 40gn hornady it needs about 11500 fps to reach a mile in one second

For practicality, A heavier bullet wouldn't need as much initial velocity. It would need more powder to get it up to speed, but it wouldn't shed that speed nearly as fast... Maybe a 50 BMG case necked down to 6.5mm would be a sweet spot.
 
I have two .204s, A Ruger #1 and a Kimber 84M. I load 32 gr Sierra BKs for the Ruger right at 4000 fps and load 39 gr BKs for the Kimber at just under 4000fps. I shoot lots of prairie dogs with them and they do explode. My .223 loaded with 50 gr BKs at around 3500 fps does a real number on them, but not like the .204. All 3 guns are quite accurate and lots of fun to shoot.
 
Maybe a 50 BMG case necked down to 6.5mm would be a sweet spot.

:) Agreed! I was thinking specifically of the 204 bullets. I'm guessing you'd want to double up on the ear protection either way.
 
I had gotten a CZ 527 in .204. First groups were awful, maybe 2-3" range, some larger. Got advice from a number of owners to try Blitzkings.

My current load is 39 grain BK over Varget. Shoots .3's-4's now. Combination of finding the correct load plus getting the barrel broken in.

Works great for doggin'. You basically have the ballistics of a .22-250 with the muzzle report of a .223. That makes a huge difference in the number of dogs that stay up. Sold my .250.
 
I wonder what kind of velocity you could get with a saboted 75 grain bullet out of a .50 BMG?

I figure the sabot would weigh about 80gr, giving a total weight for interior ballistics purposes around 150 to 175 grains.
 
This thread reminds me of my favorite wildcat cartridge, the .22 Eargesplitten Loudenboomer. .378 Weatherby Mag cartridge, necked down to accept a .224 bullet. Ackley developed it to break the 5000fps mark but only managed about 4600. Oh well. :)


edit; photo.

20160116200452-ac5a0a5c-me.jpg


edit again; that might be a photo of a different, more ridiculous cartridge (maybe the aforementioned .50BMG necked down to .223?). Found this image that might be the real deal.

20160116201215-43ff4a17.jpg
 
Last edited:
204 is a great round. I have shot the factory Hornady V Max 32gr ammo in a bolt action rifle and there is only from what I remember 4-5 inches of drop from 200 yards to 300 yards. It shot at the same point at 200 as it did 100. The Hornady V Max 204 32 grain ammo is sold at Academy for 20 dollars.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top