444 or 45-70??

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sneakshot92

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2019
Messages
787
Location
WI
Hey all, just a simple one here. My lgs says he can get his hands on a few BFR's and has these two cartrige options available. I really shouldn't spend the money right now because of reduced work hours, but if you had a choice which would you choose and why? For me it doesn't make much difference as I reload. Have dies for one round and bullets that will work in the other.
 
45-70 because it’s more common and if you ‘really shouldn’t’ be buying it turns out to be ‘really, really shouldn’t have bought it’, it will be easier to resale.
I do have a stash of 45-70 leverevolution ammo from when I owned a chiappa 1886 win copy. I sold the rifle because it wasn't worth the trouble of fixing the feeding issues. Kept the ammo and have been waiting for the "right" gun to come along
 
I have a .444 Marlin rifle and love it. I reload for it and .44 SPL and Mag, so I have plenty of .430 bullets, and the .444 likes the 265 to 300's. But I'm not so sure I'd want either of those in a BFR, or ANY handgun. Once shot a Contender in .45/70...once.
 
444 is pretty rare.
Big 45-70 appropriate bullets are common and the brass is cheap.
 
That it does, with th ability to go heavier. Makes me wonder if 44mag/spl would chamber properly in a 444 bfr.

Ive never tried to put a 44 mag in a 444 but it shouldn’t, the 444 uses the same diameter bullet but the case is tapered so the base is larger then the 44 mag. I’ve always wanted a 444 rifle, I live in Iowa which is a straight wall cartridge state for deer and think it would be perfect. Currently use a 44 mag Henry and haven’t justified stepping up to the 444, but maybe someday.
 
out of the two i would get the 45/70 But if it was me I would spend my money on a 44 magnum you will enjoy shooting it longer not only at the bench but also in your ginger years
 
Ive never tried to put a 44 mag in a 444 but it shouldn’t, the 444 uses the same diameter bullet but the case is tapered so the base is larger then the 44 mag. I’ve always wanted a 444 rifle, I live in Iowa which is a straight wall cartridge state for deer and think it would be perfect. Currently use a 44 mag Henry and haven’t justified stepping up to the 444, but maybe someday.
My best friend has hunted in Iowa some. He carries a little H&R Handi Rifle with a 375 Winchester barrel. It's a sweet little rifle. It has made me a fan of the cartridge. I'll have one someday.
 
There have been a lot of cartridges launched in the last 20 - 30 years, and most of them sank like the Titanic. The .444 Marlin never set the world on fire and may be on the way out.

The .45-70, though is here to stay.
 
Bruisers, both!

Either one can be loaded up or down as the mood suits the shooter. They pretty much overlap, however the .45/70 can be loaded with bigger and heavier bullets so it can be more versatile.

As much as a .444 intrigues me, the posters who stated the ,45/70 will sell easier should you decide to send it packing are right IMHO.

Stay safe.
 
Last time I went to the little gun store they had a few different kinds of 45-70.
I almost never see 444 at a small gun store.
Any time I do see 444 and 45-70 together the 444 is way more expensive.
 
I’m a fan of 45/70 hell 45 anything that said 444 can use 44bullits but 45/70 is 458 not 452 so if you load 44 that would be the deciding factor.
The 45/70 is more versatile (useful).One thing to watch out for when loading either round for a revolver it’s tempting to load light and squibs happen.
 
In a rifle, 45-70. In a revolver I'd certainly consider the 444. I'm thinking 45-70 might be too much of a good thing in a revolver.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top