5.56/.223 for Home Defense?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actual proof that .223's don't over penetrate might sell me on the idea.
http://how-i-did-it.org/drywall/ammunition.html
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=210739

Where does this information come from? Because I've never understood how an individual 00 pellet, which has less energy than a .380 round, is going to penetrate "more" than a rifle that has more energy than a .44 magnum (and I know some debate that issue but the muzzle energy formulas give the nod to the .223).
Because long skinny bullets at high velocities (rifle bullets) tumble or expand and start coming apart quickly when they encounter soft barriers, unless they have something like a steel insert to make them penetrate (like M855 ball / SS109). When rifle bullets tumble they quickly lose velocity. When a sphere (shot pellet) tumbles it does little to reduce velocity. Handgun bullets are essentially spheres with a flat side. That's the very simplified explanation.
 
Box O' Truth website. Buckshot didn't penetrate even 8 sheets of sheetrock while the .223 round tested went through 12 sheets of plywood and kept right on going. They never got it to stop in their tests.

I am sure if you asked the author now, he could explain how he might have done that differently as that was one of his first tests. One of the problems with it is no realistic spacing. .223 traveling at just under 3000fps barely has time to yaw or fragment before it is through all 12 boards. That is one reason you see a different result than the one in the tests ugaarguy linked.

As he explained, .223 gets its reduced penetration because the combination of light round plus high velocity causes it to break up and those tiny irregular fragments shed velocity/energy very quickly. If that doesn't happen, say due to bullet construction or because a yaw-dependent bullet did not yaw (or could not yaw in the case of some harder barriers like steel or masonry), then .223 will penetrate quite well.

The thing is I bought when prices were very low and getting as prepared as I am now would require a big influx of cash on my part and I don't want to do it for a small advantage. It would have to be significant.

Well, the big expense with ARs is the accessories and peripheals but the prices on the actual rifles and magazines right now are fantastic. You can find new magazines with upgraded followers for $8-10. During the summer sales, several guys managed to build all new AR15s for UNDER $500. Even now, instead of a $600-700 AR being a "budget" AR, I'm seeing rifles in that price range with 1:7 twist, chromed bores, midlength gas, military receiver extensions, etc. stuff that all used to be premium features or custom features.

If you ever wanted to get an AR15, it is not a bad time for it.
 
Last edited:
There is an alternate course in building an AR - build a pistol. Basically a short barreled AR 7-12" barreled upper in an alternate caliber, with pistol buffer and SB15 type wrist brace. Some are already adding the LAW folding stock adapter to store in limited space.

The advantage is that you get the same parts, in a shorter handier size that is easier to wield in tighter spaces, such as hallways or behind barricades. You get nearly the same firepower, with a 10" barrel, ballistics are generally only 300 fps slower in 6.8. That's still over 2200 fps at the muzzle. All the controls can exactly match your long rifle, no confusion there and training or just plinking all goes to the same muscle memory.

It's a handy size for other members of the family, and easier to keep about the premises in places you may prefer. It's also legal in states that would otherwise restrict NFA short barreled rifles. And in a lot of states, you can travel with it by car - loaded, even - where a rifle might be required to be unloaded and cased. That is the kind of versatility few other firearms can offer for the power levels. Whether normally purchased thru an FFL or 80%, it's an option some might consider. It's about the same length as a Tavor overall, which is one of the benefits touted for that firearm.
 
I'm assuming you mean In The House Defense. The AR isn't the best choice IMHO. Chances of needing a 30 round mag are very low and penetration through walls puts your family at risk.
A low recoil shot gun round is probably the best choice.
I'm betting that the blast, flash and bang from the 5.56 could stun you as well when fired from inside.
If you are talking about protection around the grounds then that's different.
Handguns and the .30 Carbine Rifle have always been good choices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top