5 dogs severely maul deputy; 3 Dogs shot in incident

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mark Tyson

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
2,523
Location
Where the one eyed man is king
5 dogs severely maul deputy
Alarm sent Chatham officer to home;
1 of the 3 American bulldogs shot dies


Copyright 2003 The Durham Herald Co.
The Herald-Sun (Durham, N.C.)
August 1, 2003, Friday


PITTSBORO -- Five large American bulldogs severely mauled a 24-year-old Chatham County sheriff's deputy Thursday morning when she responded to an alarm activation at their owners' home, said Maj. Gary Blankenship of the Chatham County Sheriff's Office.

The deputy was checking the premises of the home at 591 Hills of the Haw Road near Pittsboro at about 8:10 a.m. when the dogs attacked her, Blankenship said.

"It was very serious. She had a lot of injuries ... big gashes. If you had seen the injuries on this deputy, you would have cringed," Blankenship said.


An ambulance took her to Western Wake Medical Center, where she spent about five hours receiving treatment, including 28 stitches, for numerous punctures and cuts from bites to her left arm and right thigh, Blankenship said.

She was released from the hospital about 2 p.m. and went home, the major said.

Though it's not known when she'll be able to return to work, the sheriff's office is "anticipating a full recovery," Blankenship said. "We told her to take her time."

The sheriff's office was not releasing the name of the deputy or relaying requests for media interviews on Thursday, so she might have some time to recover, the major said.

"The deputy is under medication right now. She's a tough officer. She's one of our best," Blankenship said.

The deputy has been with the department for a year and a half, and acted as she had been trained to, the major said.

She showed restraint as she tried to get away from the dogs, Blankenship said. She used a flashlight and pepper spray against them. Each time the dogs backed off a little, then came right back at her.

"The dogs had knocked the officer down three times," Blankenship said.

Two men doing landscaping work for the owners at the end of the driveway on the property heard the deputy hollering and came to help her, the major said. They found the dogs attacking her as she lay on the ground 20 to 25 feet away from her car.

Using sticks they picked up, the workers beat the dogs off the deputy so she could get into her car, where she called for help.

"She took some old uniforms and wrapped her wounds because she was bleeding badly," Blankenship said.

The dogs went after the workers, who managed to run away without getting bitten.

About a dozen officers responded to the call, and as they tried to set up a perimeter so emergency medical workers could enter the area, the dogs attacked them. The officers shot three of the dogs, Blankenship said.

No officers were injured.

"One of the detectives that shot one of the dogs, he said when the dog was coming at him, he saw blood in the dog's mouth," Blankenship said.

Officers killed one of the dogs and wounded two others.

The two wounded dogs and the other two surviving dogs were taken to Pittsboro Animal Hospital, which is the closest to the owners' home, veterinarian Craig Correy said Thursday.

"They're stable," Correy said, of the two female dogs, one of which was seriously injured. "They probably will recover. I think they're going to be fine."

The veterinarian said he had performed routine surgery on one of the dogs before.

The sheriff's office would not release the owners' names on Thursday.

"Emotions are high. We had to shoot three of their dogs," Blankenship said.

One of the owners -- a woman -- had been the last to leave the home Thursday morning and had accidentally set off the alarm. But she did not call either the alarm company or police to tell them that it was a false alarm, Blankenship said.

Officer have to respond to all burglar alarms unless they know it's a false alarm, Blankenship said. They handle about 2,000 such calls a year.

Chatham County Health Department Director Dorothy Cilenti said Thursday that her department would look into the incident.

"We investigate wherever there's a bite," Cilenti said.

Pet owners have to provide documentation that their animals have been vaccinated for rabies; the owners of the five bulldogs said that the dogs were up-to-date on their rabies shots, Cilenti said.

"We don't have any dangerous dog declarations or bites to humans from that property," Cilenti said, of the address where the attacks occurred Thursday.

But Chatham County Animal Control does have a file containing complaints about dogs on that property, although it was not known Thursday if the complaints concerned any of the dogs that attacked the deputy, Cilenti said.

Cilenti said she did not know details about complaints against any dogs on the property. But she and animal control officials plan to review the file as part of their investigation into the attack.

As part of the investigation, officials will consider the dogs' aggressive behavior on Thursday, Cilenti said.

Depending on the results of that investigation, the dogs could be destroyed or declared dangerous, Cilenti said.

If dogs are declared dangerous, the owners usually have to ensure that the dogs remain in a fenced-in area or otherwise under control, the director said.

The five bulldogs in the Thursday attack had been confined by an electric fence, and signs to that effect were posted on the property, Cilenti said.
 
Bad deal for all involved.

The dogs did what dogs are supposed to do..protect their turf.

The deputy was doing her duty, checking on an alarm.

I hope that the homeowners will not be forced by some overzealous city officials to give up their dogs.

According to the article, they had taken the proper precautions with their animals. Perhaps they will be more receptive to calling in the false alarm next time.

Frankly, I'm suprised that the deputy was not more seriously injured. 5 dogs is a pack and bulldogs are a powerful breed. She showed more restraint than I would have. I'm suprised that she had time to use an ASP or pepperspray, lots of times you dont have time to do anything.

Its a no win situation for all involved. More than likely, the sherrifs dept. will have to pay for the vet bills and the homeowners have lost at least one of their dogs. There will be bad feeling on all sides, the deputys that had to shoot them, the owners whos dogs got shot and the public which will view the actions of the shooters as being extreme, no matter what the facts were.
 
That is a tough one. Hard to call it either way. That is sad that the dogs had to be shot. At least the officer tried to get away instead of blazing away. Maybe a warning shot would have been effective.
 
I don't believe a warning shot would have made any difference. Dogs can't rationalize like that. It is a terrible situation. I feel bad for the dogs, and bad for the Police. I have some issue with the dig owners who didn't call police to inform of a false alarm. Had they called this whole situation may have been avoided.
 
Maybe a warning shot would have been effective.

I dont think so. Ive BTDT. I popped a shot in the ground right in front of a large german shepard that was hell bent on eating me for lunch. It kicked dirt all over his face. It didnt even slow him down, he didnt reconize it as a warning, if anything, t was a loud sound that he interpreted as a form of aggression, the same way he would if you had growled at him. Since I only have 7 shots left in my mag, I wasnt about to waste any more on language he didnt understand.

A dog, even a large one, that is charging toward you is not as easy to hit as one would think...trust me.
 
The only thing that saved the Deputy from getting flamed is her injuries. If she had shot the dogs to prevent the injuries she'd be toast...
links_flametoaster.jpeg
 
El Rojo, I know you've thought about this kind of thing before. I know I have. The thing that makes this so crummy is, if the officer shoots a dog in self-defense, she'll get crucified publicly for shooting a guard dog on its own turf. I agree with Watchman that 3 or more dogs constitutes a "pack", and when dogs act as a pack, it's worse than mob mentality in humans. The trick with pack dogs is to pick out the alpha dog; the other dogs clue off of him (or her), and if he gets aggressive, the rest will do so as well, often instantaneously.

My personal rule of thumb is to attempt to deal with a single aggressive dog on its own turf with intermediate weapons (OC spray and baton) first. With two, the matter is a question of their size and just how confident I feel that day. With three or more, using intermediate weapons is an invitation to get bit, and possibly pulled down. That's not an option. While I've taken two classes on baton use and feel like I have adequate mastery of it, I'm not Bruce Lee, and cannot guarentee being able to neutralize 3 simultaneous attacks from large animals.

In my department, warning shots are explicitly forbidden in our Use Of Force continuum. This is not an unusual policy.
 
Um, head? :rolleyes:
Drjones
Baton strike points are mussle mass/nerve plexis areas designed to stun/disable a person w/o serious injury. A baton is never used to strike a person in the head unless deadly force is justified (the same as shooting them with a firearm). If you're going to strike a dog in the head with a baton, why not just shoot him? :confused:
 
Here's my take:

False alarm or not, the doggies weren't playing.

The deputy should have acted accordingly. Of course the whole situation is awful; its horrible the sheriff was hurt, and awful that the dogs were shot.

However, she could have at least protected herself by shooting the dogs. Screw sprays; those are for lunch and dinner seasoning, not for use on dogs. I recall reading some posts from some people who are very experienced with dogs saying that when you are faced with a PACK of dogs, all bets are off.

If it had been one or maybe two, she could have tried spray. But with FIVE DOGS, its a whole different situation. She should have been shooting from the get-go.

And let's not forget where the blame ultimately lays: on the homeowner for not calling in the false alarm, and for not taking some safety measures with the dogs like letting the alarm company and/or local PD know about the dogs.
 
If you're going to strike a dog in the head with a baton, why not just shoot him?
It is my understanding that, with the exception of head shots, dogs can be quite difficult to take down.

Various sprays have wildly varying degrees of success, and stories abound of them taking many, many bullets and not even blinking.

If you think you can shoot the head of a dog that is running at you full tilt, that's great. I doubt most people could.

Hitting the same target with a stick is probably a lot easier.

That's my thinking....

Sorry for being flip in my prior post. I haven't eaten lunch yet.:D
 
Bullets have a pretty good track record of stopping the attack of an agressive dog (with or without killing it). I'd bet a lot more on my Glock 22 stopping a large aggressive dog than a 21" ASP baton. ASP gives some of the best baton training in the world, and they do not recommend using a baton on a large aggressive dog. With a firearm you don't have to hit the head to stop the attack, torso shots work well. I suspect that what happened to that poor Deputy will wake a few up to how dangerous dogs can be. Sadly, I doubt few owners will step up, but hopefully people will exercise more caution around dogs.
 
Bullets have a pretty good track record of stopping the attack of an agressive dog (with or without killing it). I'd bet a lot more on my Glock 22 stopping a large aggressive dog than a 21" ASP baton. ASP gives some of the best baton training in the world, and they do not recommend using a baton on a large aggressive dog. With a firearm you don't have to hit the head to stop the attack, torso shots work well.

See, I have heard EXACTLY the opposite; that bullets are not that reliable, and torso shots do not work for immediate stops. Obviously torso shots could kill a dog, its just a question of if he's dead before he gets to chew on you or not. :uhoh: As with humans, torso shots usually do not provide for immediate stops; people (and dogs) have continued attacking even after multiple shots COM.

You must also remember that a huge part of the effectiveness of firearms is psychological; it is so deeply ingrained in us that they are dangerous, deadly, etc. This does not apply to animals. Dogs, upon being shot, don't freak out and think "oh my god!!! I've been shot! HEEEELLLPPP!!!" They don't know any better and keep coming.

While a baton would not be my first choice to face down a dog with, I'd probably feel more comfortable with that than with a handgun. First choice would probably be a 12er. :D

Let's hope we never have to find out the hard way...:uhoh:
 
I hate the whole "cop shoots dog" baloney that we see all too often.

HOWEVER, if you have an alarm system tied to the local police agency you are in effect, inviting police onto your property. When you invite people onto your property you have an obligation to restrain your animals.

If the situation were different - say the officer had entered the property uninvited because she saw something "suspicious" - then it would be an entirely different matter. In that case, she must assume the risks inherent in passing a gate or fence that is there to keep people out and dogs in.

The home owner is entirely at fault here.

Keith
 
Every time that I've loaded my ASP with the intention of defending myself against an aggressive dog, I've planned to whack the dog on the head. If this kills the dog, so be it. But this keeps me the longest distance from the attacking animal, and gives me the best chance of defeating it with the least number of strikes. But it makes sure that I don't have to answer for where by bullets go. I don't have to undergo the inevitable scrutiny that accompanies any shot fired on duty. I don't have to type up a "Use Of Deadly Force" letter that goes into my personnel file. (In my department, and many others, any shot fired is a Deadly Force incident, but swinging an ASP at an attacking dog is not. It would need an incident report, but not a Deadly Force report.)

You'll catch a LOT of flack from the locals if you shoot a dog in its own front yard. Beat it off of you with a baton, however, and there's more understanding. Around here, people have a saying about mean people:"He's the kind of guy who'll shoot yer dog on yer own front porch." You just REALLY don't want to be that guy. You gotta work amongst these people. :) ;)
 
Matt brings up excellent points.

Especially if you are on concrete, asphalt, or another hard surface, bullet deflection is a concern. :uhoh:

And of course clubbing a dog to death with an ASP is nowhere NEAR as evil as shooting it, in the eyes of the public. :rolleyes:
 
Seems to me that it should be procedure to take along a shotgun when investigating an alarm, alone.
Why didn’t the back up cops at least bring a long gun?
 
Recently in the seattle area a police dog tracking a suspect was attacked by two pit bulls. The pitbulls came out of some woods where their owner was walking them. Two officers sprayed the pits directly into their eyes/face at close range and it had no effect except to enrage the pits further. The officers shot and killed them both. I mention this just to reinforce how ineffective some methods that work well on humans can be on animals.
BTW, the police dogs body armor prevented serious harm......tom
 
I don't see anything extreme in the officer's actions in this. 5 Dogs?:uhoh:

Officer doing her job, dogs doing thiers. Very unfortunate. If the homeowner knew they set the alarm off and that police response was immenint, (s) he had a responsibility to make a couple calls, late to work or not (which is total speculation on my part.)

I think it may have been more appropriate in this case for the officer to forgo the baton and spray, and go straight to the pistol. We are talking 5 dogs at once here.

I don't believe a warning shot would have made any difference. Dogs can't rationalize like that.

It worked for me once with a single dog. Maybe I was lucky. I dont think it would have worked on a pack of dogs.

The only thing that saved the Deputy from getting flamed is her injuries. If she had shot the dogs to prevent the injuries she'd be toast.

Pre-emptive Ad Homenim blanket statement, sir? Why don't you practice what you preach?

Seems to me that it should be procedure to take along a shotgun when investigating an alarm, alone.

That makes sense. I feel bad for all involved.
 
Dog bites me while i'm in uniform, i'm going to shoot it.

With five dogs attacking this deputy, shooting all of them would not have been out of line. Shes damm lucky to be alive!


12-34hom.
 
Dog bites me while i'm in uniform, i'm going to shoot it.

What if you're trespassing on private property, as is the case in most of these dog shootings? If somebody enters my yard and starts shooting my animals I'm going to assume they are armed and insane and begin shooting at them from cover - whether they are wearing a uniform or not.

What makes you think "wearing a uniform" exempts from you the law, much less common courtesy?

Keith
 
First of all I dont trespass on private property. Uniform or not.

Secondly, I wont shoot your dog unless I absolutley have too. Uniform or not.

Thirdly, no deptuy or police officer that I know of takes any pleasure in shooting anyones dog, trust me, its the last thing anyone wants to do.

Common courtesy goes both ways here.

and lastley...

if you begin shooting from cover at an officer wearing a uniform you will eventually die. You'll be the one that is "assumed" to be "insane".

With that being said...chill out.

See how emotions flare when a dog gets shot ? Often times the facts dont matter. People like yourself always assume the cop is at fault. Personally,I think she went above and beyonf the call of duty in those circumstances.
Noone in their right mind would fault her if she did shoot the dogs. Rest assured, if I responded to a call like that Id be looking over the sights of my AR-15 as soon as I was out the door...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top