MidRoad
Member
See there we both agree rugers are problematic junk
Typical irrational ruger lover. Bitch about the injection molded innards of a s&w and then turn around and do a bubba home smith job on the trigger of a ruger just to claim it's now just as good as a s&w. How pathetic!!!
I love the internal locks, heck both my sa 1911's have them also.
Odd, I always thought the barrels on the s&w's were 1 piece. But I wouldn't expect the typical ruger owner such as yourself to really know what your talking about when it comes to gun pieces and parts. If you knew what you were looking at you wouldn't be buying too many rugers. See, it's actually pretty simple. How about the watered down version. There's this thing that looks like a tube with a thing-a-ma-bob on the end. That's called a barrel It's all 1 piece. I know pretty hard to understand but after you re-read the "this thing that looks like a tube with a thing-a-ma-bob on the end" "this thing that looks like a tube with a thing-a-ma-bob on the end" "this thing that looks like a tube with a thing-a-ma-bob on the end". You might get it but I'm really not expecting too much too quickly.
At the end of the day no matter how it's sliced and diced the s&w is a better firearm right out of the box. The m69 can do things the gp-100 can only dream about. But then again some of us expect more out of a firearm than a 250gr bullet doing +/- 900fps.
I think by two peice barrels he's referring to the newer guns that have a barrel and a sleeve. Rather than just a barrel with the sight mounted on it.