Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

6.5 Grendel vs 6.8 spc reliabilty???

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Float Pilot, Oct 5, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Float Pilot

    Float Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,154
    Location:
    Kachemak Bay Alaska
    For those of you who have fired both the 6.5mm Grendel and the 6.8mm SPC extensively....

    Is there really a reliablity difference between the two cartridges when fired from an AR platform?
     
  2. Marcus L.

    Marcus L. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Florida
    It's doubtful that you'll find someone who owns both, let alone someone who shoots both enough to give you an accurate determination of feeding reliability. You're also unlikely to find an individual who does not have some bias that will skew any information that they give you one the subject matter. A lot of AR shooters that use non 5.56 calibers don't push their platforms beyond bench shooting with optics anyhow. This is why we look to weapons testing by large military or police organizations which have reduced bias and really put equipment through a beating. The 6.8 SPC has undergone extensive JSWB-IPT testing, FBI BRF testing, USMC testing, and the recent CTTSO/TSWG MURG Congressional demonstration. Every aspect of its development was done in increments to determine the ideal caliber, ideal case capacity, ideal case characteristics, and ideal terminal performance.
    http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2008Intl/Roberts.pdf

    The Grendel on the other hand was designed from scratch to fire a 6.5mm projectile at a target velocity of 2200fps-2400fps at the muzzle with little if any considerations for important factors as I mentioned in the previous sentence.

    There is also another option which is gaining ground as a universal military cartridge replacement. Given no platform restrictions(M4/M16), the same guys who designed the 6.8 SPC also designed the 7x46mm which lauchest a 130gr bullet at around 2600fps from a 16" barrel. This round was considered to be the ideal universal cartridge in that it is controllable from a short full auto carbine, but is powerful enough to be used in medium machine guns and sniper rifles. Basically, a return to the standardization logistics of WWI and WWII where the .30-06 was the universal cartridge.
     
  3. everallm

    everallm Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,504
    As mentioned above relatively few folks go down both routes.

    Hopefully though you should be able to get some real world stats in a couple of months when Robinson Arms get the 6.5 barrels and conversion kits for the XCR rifle out the door.

    There are a number of folks with the XCR in 6.8 who already have the 6.5 on order and will be able to do direct side by side comparisons with the 2 calibres on the same rifle.

    It will be very interesting to see actual real world comparisons, like for like.
     
  4. Float Pilot

    Float Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,154
    Location:
    Kachemak Bay Alaska
    From 1977 until 2006 my career was centered around both those with a lot of overlap.
    We just hid ur bias with BS or were ordered to promote the bias of those from whom we took our marching orders.
     
  5. Marcus L.

    Marcus L. Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2008
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Florida
    I hear ya, I've seen the bias myself in the military and now in the Federal police system. However, they are the only two organizations that get a large number of testers together, buy a large number of firearms to test, and buy thousands-to-millions of rounds and put it all through rigorous paces. The Department of Homeland Security went through over 3-million rounds of .40S&W and almost 300 pistols before they adopted the Sig P229.

    Rumor has it that the Grendel has been seeing a lot of testing in addition to the 6.8 SPC with the agencies I listed in my first post. Right now, the 6.8 SPC is in the lead. I don't know what the problems are they are finding with the Grendel, but they are likely due to several issues that I have posted about before. Lack of good terminal effects with many different bullet designs, steep case shoulder which reduces feeding reliability(short magnum syndrome), and short case length which makes it a poor choice for belt fed weapons(short magnum syndrome again).

    The last post I made on this thread has some good visuals of the terminal effects problems:
    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=396783&page=2
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page