6.5 WSSM

Status
Not open for further replies.

Poper

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
2,834
Location
Semi-Free State of Arizona
I built a .243-6.5 WSSM on a Browning A-Bolt III .223 WSSM action several years ago. This project actually had a goal in mind: A short, light, quick handling rifle capable of .260 Remington performance out of a 19" barrel. I doubt I can get that kind of velocities out of a 19" barrel, but we will see.
The dang thing had feeding issues right off the git-go! I fiddled with it off and on for a couple years and, eventually, it found its way to the back of the gun safe.

In need of entertainment because my Sako 6.5x55 SM was getting boringly easy to work different loads up for it, I dug the 6.5 WSSM out of the safe.
I studied the dummies I had made up for the gun from new .25 WSSM cases years ago and then studied the drawings of the .243 WSSM and .25 WSSM. I already had a .243 WSSM and so elected to use .25 WSSM cases for the 6.5 WSSM to keep the two easily separate. The shoulder angles of the two are slightly different and probably account for the smoking of the 6.5 WSSM shoulders in the test loads that I fired years ago.
This time around, I decided to use new .243 WSSM cases from recent production cases. Fully prepped (sized, trimmed, chamfered, deburred, primer flashole deburred) and ready to load, I made up 3 dummies with Sierra 120 gr. GK's at 2.300" COAL. All chambered exceptionally tight. RCBS's Precision Mic indicated the shoulder set-back was .003", .005 and .006" for the 3 cases, so that wasn't the issue. I blackened the bullets and chambered them. All showed indications of striking the feed ramp but not jamming into the lands. I then blackened the necks and these showed marks indicating a too tight fit. A little trial and error with the Forster neck turning setup and things began working nicely by turning .003" off the outside diameter of the necks.
In my previous episode with the little gun I had used Berger 130 grain hunting bullets. The Sierra 120 gr. GK, is not so sharply pointed and is considerably shorter in length. I think this and maybe the .243 WSSM cases appear to have resolved the feeding issues. I have since turned all the new case necks and loaded up a batch of test loads with CCI-250 primers and IMR4350. 12 rounds ran through the magazine without a hitch. Saturday, weather permitting, I'll take her to the range and see if she will print a promising group.
:)
 
Last edited:
Weather at the range was ideal.
First round test loads were IMR4350, CCI-250, Sierra 120 gr GK. Best group of the 5 loads printed about 1.480" for the 6 rounds group. Average velocity for that group was 3064 fps. ES= 44.48 SD= 18.29. Not too bad. Unfortunately, this load was the hottest of the test. It also is a compressed load using a drop tube. No sticky bolt, no excessively flattened primers. The good news is that this was the first firing of this brass. Groups should tighten up from here. The goal is to have a hunting bullet at 2900 fps (+/-) shooting under 1.25". We're close already!

I have a neck sizer for this cartridge, so there is the opportunity to stuff just a little more 4350 in there.
If I don't find a decent group in the next couple rounds of testing, I will try IMR4064 with the 120 grain SGK.

Let the fun begin!:D
 
That's a good looking rifle....but I think your Grendel might have eaten a few too many .223s, he's getting chubby:D

That's pretty good for a first try load!

You may want to give superformance a try, being a ball powder you could probably cram a bit more in. I've had good results with it in stuff like the 6.5cm and my 250ai, which should have a similar capacity.
 
That's a good looking rifle....but I think your Grendel might have eaten a few too many .223s, he's getting chubby:D

That's pretty good for a first try load!

You may want to give superformance a try, being a ball powder you could probably cram a bit more in. I've had good results with it in stuff like the 6.5cm and my 250ai, which should have a similar capacity.
Thank you for the compliments and input. I have never tried Superformance powder. The ball powders I have in the past used are W748 and W760 plus a few others, but that has been years ago. I liked the accurate metering and perfomance was very good. But boy were they dirty! :barf:
My latest venture into new fangled powders has been the IMR Enduron powders. I have found them to be very consistent and they definitely reduce copper fouling to almost nothing. I just haven't been able to get quite as good of groups as I have with the old standby powders of IMR4064, 4350 and 4831.
 
Browning .264 WSSM update:
Well, nuts.
I am able to get 1-1/2" 5-round groups with 120 gr. Sierra Game Kings, CCI-250 primers and IMR4350 at 3,066 f.p.s and a SD of 17.74 for 10 rounds. That's the good news. The bad news is that the copper fouling is something awful!

Next venture into load development: IMR4451. Supposed to reduce, if not eliminate, copper fouling. Minor loss of velocity, I am sure, but will 100 f.p.s. or so be noticed by a deer size critter? I doubt it....
 
I haven't tried any of the endurons, cfe223 which uses the same tech really does seem to help with copper tho.
The newer powders are available now and I'm running low on 4350 so i figgured I'd try them also.
 
Well, I have not been able to get my best groups with IMR4451 or IMR4166 in 6.5x55, .308 Win., .30-06 or .270 Win. But who knows? Maybe the .264 WSSM will be a better marriage? I have a couple pounds of each on hand, so I figure I gotta try it. Nothing to lose and this is a hobby, after all, right? :scrutiny:
 
I don't think a deer would notice the 100 fps at the muzzle. 100 fps is only about 10 yards of point blank range anyway. Just have the deer come in a little closer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top