642 Club Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote: I'll bet the choice of 135's has more to do with velocity & foot pounds than POA.

Nematocyst - You may be right concerning velocity & foot pounds than POA.

Quote: POA at what distance?

Glockman19 - Using the Remington & Winchester 125gr HP, 130gr FMC and the Speer 135gr HP: a POA at approx. 4 yards, POI groups were around 1-2 inches or so low to the right of the bullseye (around 4:00). I am a lefty and one of my son's is a righty and he had pretty much the same results. At a POA at approx. 8 yards, POI groups were 4-6 inches or so low to the right of the bullseye at around 4:00.

Using 158gr LWC & FMJ, my POA at around 4 yards gave me a POI of close to a 3 inch group around the bullseye of the target while a POA at around 8 yards gave me a POI of close to a 7 inch group around the bullseye of the target.

jt1 - You are so right that this is not a target pistol. I guess that it really doesn't matter wheter your carry ammo is Speer 135gr HP or 158gr LSWC/HP as long as you can keep some composure and put into practice what you have learned if presented with a confrontation.

We sometimes don't realize or understand all the many variables and complexities that
are involved between the ammo, shooter, grip, target and the environment. Not to mention that even with the amount of effort that has gone into ammo testing, a lot of the info is still just theory and dependant of multiple variables. Where is the fine line in bullet weight between the muzzle dipping and not dipping? Why of course that depends on other factors.

I guess all that you can do is practice and carry what you are comfortable with and hope that the only BG that you have to shoot is one on a paper target.
 
We sometimes don't realize or understand all
the many variables and complexities that are involved
between the ammo, shooter, grip, target and the environment.
In systems theory, we recognize that many linked variables cause nonlinearities
that make accurate quantitative predictions darn near impossible.

I guess all that you can do is practice and carry what you are comfortable with
and hope that the only BG that you have to shoot is one on a paper target.
Skoal!
_______

Check it: p. 99!

The excitement builds ...

smiley-green-bouncing.gif
 
trane fan - Welcome to the 642 Club, we are pleased to have you here. I agree that the factory grips leave something to be desired, what are you going to change to? Let us know how you range session goes.

Nem - I have looked at several NITB 317's and unfortunately have not found one with acceptable fit and finish. What I would really like to have is a 417 :evil:

Rx for Nonlinearities - Point, Shoot, Repeat as necessary...
 
What I would really like to have is a 417 :evil:
Well, even with that little smiling devil,
I went to the SW site to look for a 417.

<JT sets hook, reels in a jellyfish>

Until the 417s are in production,
(guess it must still be in R&D :D)
I'll still take a 317, even if it's a bit rough. :cool:

Rx for Nonlinearities - Point, Shoot, Repeat as necessary...
RxN-PSR

;)
 
Yuze Guyz

are way too deep for me...

Quote:
Rx for Nonlinearities - Point, Shoot, Repeat as necessary...

RxN-PSR

I'm just moving through day to day life carrying. ;)

You might be a wheelgunner if.... you anguish over your stainless cylinder having "raccoon eyes".

But if you had a 442 or a 340 you would still be a wheelgunner but wouldn't anquish. :D
 
Holy crap!!!! Okay I'm lazy and don't want to muddle through the 50+ pages of info, sorry, but I'm Polish and that much info really taxes my brain.

Question: what ammo do you prefer to carry for SD; I mean a knock down, 1 shot 1 kill kinda ammo. As a retired infantry soldier of 24 years, I don't like BS'ing with the same BG for a long time.

I could carry a 500 or 454, but again I'm lazy and thats just too much weight. I called George Foreman, figured he'd hang out and protect me, he said he was too busy selling grills, go figure!

Thanks for the info.
 
Okay I'm lazy and don't want to muddle through the 50+ pages of info

tawcat - Hey Top, I know you legs are lazy, but we just did the ammo thing in the last two pages :D, anyway welcome to the 642 Club, always room for an another elevenbangbang around here.

BTW, this is part two, part one of this thread has 201 pages and over fiVe thousand posts.

... I mean a knock down, 1 shot 1 kill kinda ammo...

For the .38 special, this is about as good as it gets:

I stand with Camjr and davidconatser in supporting the 158gr LSWCHP/LSWC and the Speer gold dot. My personal preference is to go with the Buff Bore 20A, as I feel this is the max available (and I would not care to try anything hotter than this loading, if any exist) and while it is a bit more costly, in this case I think you get what you pay for and IMO it's worth it.

And:

Buffalo Bore ammo is available from the company website: http://www.buffalobore.com/ Tim Sundles, a member here at THR and an all around good guy runs this company. They have several flavors of .38 special, the ones of interest here are the (20A )+P and the (20C) standard pressure. The 20C is about as hot as most others +P, and the 20A is a quite serious load. My recommendation would be a box of each as well as some other brand name 158gr +P/SP LSWCHP's for your own evaluation to choose a carry round, then lay in a suppy of your choice and do most training with some 148/158gr target wadcutters

So there you go, IMO the Buff Bore (20A) 158gr +P LSWCHP is the most effective, big noise and big recoil, and if you can handle them, big holes...

Follow Me...RLTW
 
Last edited:
Actually I have enjoyed reading through the club thread, and the pics some have posted are great. I have gotten quite a few ideas on holsters and new grips just from the pictures alone.
I load Gold Dots in my 442, thats what Sportsman's Whorehouse had in stock. Might have to try those Buffalo Bore soon tho.
 
Actually I have enjoyed reading through the club thread ...
It's nice to read such reviews.

This thread and its predecessor have been such a journey for several of us.
Good to know that some useful words and images have been left in the wake.

Of course, marines find growth in the Quigley.

Just think of the last 99 pages as
an intellectual Quigley.

:cool:
________________

I think I'll shift my carry load over to 158's.
 
Hmm. How to describe the Quigley?

I wasn't a marine,
let alone a marine officer,
so I know Quigley only through film.

It is a marine officer "execise"
during which the officer in training
must lay on his/her back in rapidly flowing water
then squeeze through a culvert
smaller than their shoulders
with head downstream.

Having to do so on one's back insures that one's nose
is pointing up so that water flows in easily
causing that choking sensation. :what:

Having to squeeze through that narrow tube
insures that one must critically think
about how to get through.
(Hint: bend shoulders upwards.)

From what I've seen in the films,
it appears to be an exercise in horror,
but for those who pop out the other side
(which is to say, all of them),
a lesson is learned.

Kinda like a realization that
maybe we should switch to 158 gr.
 
Last edited:
I remember the culvert underwater obstacle during the time we went to Okinawa. Although for ours it was face down and there was a rope strung through to pull.

I can remember seeing one of the training NCOs urinating in the water upstream!
 
I just acquired a 642 with the laser grip. Whole new experience for me. I'll go through and read the above posts when I get the chance.

I preferred the appearance of the 442, but aftermarket laser grips would have cost more.

With luck it will be a long time before I have any finish issues. Several of the people where I test fired the gun have had them for years with no problems.
 
jt1 - Thanks for the reply and the suggestions. Have heard a lot about Buffalo Bore, plan to place an order for my .380 (27B) stuff so I'll add the 20A to my order. Hoo-aah!
 
Just purchased a 642 and am looking to purchase an IWB holster. Looking at the crossbreed supertuck. I also purchased a Ruger LCP for pocket carry. Anyone have experience with these? I get my CPL next week!
 
Kleanbore, rosharb - Welcome to the 642 Club, come on in and look around, stay awhile...

Kleanbore - The 642 Clear Coat is fairly robust, just take it easy on the chemical cleaners, and don't put any duct tape on it, as the clear coat likes the tape better than the gun and tends to stay with it...(you don't want to know :eek:)

rosharb - I don't do well with IWB's, but Crossbread makes excellent equipment and I have heard only good things about the supertuck, mostly from folks packing large frame bottomfeeders, should work well with a j-frame. Let us know how you like it.

...maybe we should switch to 158 gr...

Nem - My friend, once again you display excellent judgement :):)

...417's :neener:, Nonlin/RxN-PSR, Quigleys and raccoon eyes...:cool:

1/7GRUNT said:
I can remember seeing one of the training NCOs urinating in the water upstream!
NCO's...you gotta love em...:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
RxN-PSR-Q&RE :cool:
________

Just found a thread entitled "Armed citizen analysis".

IMO, it's more relevant to life than the current media attention on politics. :barf:

These lines caught my attention.

The most common size of handgun was the .35 caliber family (.38, .357, 9mm) at 61%,
with most .38s apparently being of the 5 shot variety.

CONCLUSIONS
1) Even small caliber weapons are adequate to solve the vast majority of incidents requiring armed self-defense.
2) Mindset of the potential victim was far more important than the type of weapon used.
All the victims were willing to fight their opponents in order to survive.
 
rosharb said:
Just purchased a 642 and am looking to purchase an IWB holster. Looking at the crossbreed supertuck. I also purchased a Ruger LCP for pocket carry. Anyone have experience with these? I get my CPL next week!

I carry a Ruger LCP, neat little piece. I've only fired it a few times and I'm not the best shot. I found for me it shoots a bit low left, however, 7 rounds are in the ring within about 3" at about 7 yards.
 
Nem - Good link, very interesting though I wonder what the data would look like if negative as well as positive outcomes were included, but interesting nonetheless. In addition to your quotes I find the following passages quite relevant to our concerns:

The average and median number of shots fired was 2.

(In 482 incidents) Reloading was required in only 3 incidents. (two if you discount the lion :eek:)

Multiple conspirators were involved in 36% of the incidents.

Awareness of the surroundings appears to be a key element of successful defense.

I am surprised by the percentages of occurrences in the home, I have always thought that (and in my experience) public places posed the greatest threat:

home - 52%
business - 32%
Public - 9%
vehicles - 7%

I carry 24/7. It would appear that it is worth the effort to do so, and at this point it has become second nature to me:

The firearm was carried on the body of the defender in only 20% of incidents. In 80% of cases, the firearm was obtained from a place of storage, frequently in another room.

While I have often recommend it, I will say again, for home carry nothing is better than a Smartcarry and an X42...
 
Any suggestions as to the best (cheapest price and reliable retailer) to pick up the Crimson Trace LG405 grips?
 
I just did an online search using ShopWiki and they came up with prices from $232 with free shipping to $299.

My Dad just bought a pair locally. The prices varied at different local gun shops from $224 (Had to be ordered but I think it was one week and this is what he did) to $279 at another store which had them in stock.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top