kmrcstintn,
I happen to think that it is an excellent "Controlled Expansion" load and I carry it exclusively in my Glock 17 (and 19) for SD/CC since its terminal performance characteristics fit my specific needs.
It expands with predictable regularity to 0.53"-0.57" (~1.5x caliber) and penetrates 14"- 16" in calibrated ordinance gelatin. There seems to be very little difference in the muzzle flash produced by all three (TAP-FPD, TAP "CQ" and Custom) offerings from the testing that I have done and all use the exact same XTP bullet.
Although it is an "older SD ammunition design" developed to pass the F.B.I minimum penetration (12") test protocals, it performs as advertised and offers "match grade" accuracy out of my gun giving me sub-3" groups at 25 yards, off hand, if I do my part, but YMMV, of course.
I usually use it as "up close anti-prairie dog" ammunition when I go out to Montana every June and can hit them with 'satisfying regularity' out to 50 yards from the bench. Really puts them down, too and you know how dangerous those prairie dogs can be when they charge.
Here are the results of one of my chronograph sessions a couple of years ago:
Test Date: 20July2006
Hornady 147 gr. TAP-FPD XTP JHP (#90288)
HI: 1068 fps
LO: 995 fps
AV: 1023 fps
ES: 73 fps
SD: 18.49 fps
n: 18 rnds
Comments: Advertised velocity is 975 fps. Very consistent/accurate.
Hornady 147 gr. TAP "CQ" XTP JHP (#90285)
HI: 1043 fps
LO: 1003 fps
AV: 1024 fps
ES: 40 fps
SD: 10.17 fps
n: 24 rnds
Comments: Advertised velocity is 975 fps. Very accurate in test gun. My current carry load in all my 9mm CCW sidearms.
Test Platform: Glock 17 (ser.#: XXX564US) Barrel: 4.49"/114mm
Temp: 81 F Humidity: 62% Elevation: ~650 ft. ASL.
Instrumental Distance: ~5 ft. (Shooting Chrony F-1)
If you decide to employ this as your SD/CC load, just be aware of the fact that it offers very deep penetration and moderate expansion against human targets and prepare/engage accordingly.
Regards,