Mad Chemist
Member
From Oleg's sticky....(emphasis mine)
The four rules exist for a good reason. Following them is a good way to NOT get shot.
I have been in multiple motor vehicle accidents and one accident where I was struck by an SUV while riding a bicycle. Somehow I managed to survive them all without permanent injury. So even if I accept the premise of the vehicle/firearm analogy (which I do not because it is a false premise) the causal link to the conclusion is unsupported.
When debating, please avoid the typical logical fallacies common to debates at lesser forums. Remember that we should be more interested in a Socratic discourse, a search for the truth and a plan of action more than on winning the debates.
The four rules exist for a good reason. Following them is a good way to NOT get shot.
I have been in multiple motor vehicle accidents and one accident where I was struck by an SUV while riding a bicycle. Somehow I managed to survive them all without permanent injury. So even if I accept the premise of the vehicle/firearm analogy (which I do not because it is a false premise) the causal link to the conclusion is unsupported.