A Physics Primer

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's pretty close, Ash...but it's much less complicated to explain.

But I want RX to understand why his hypothetical welded plug/locked breech system can't function. Can't.

And why the welded plug/straight blowback can and will.

So, it you get it nailed...

shhhhh ;)
 
THE BARREL IS NOT PUSHING THE SLIDE BACK during recoil and extraction in a 1911 type pistol. That's what I keep seein when I read these threads. That's a fact that is going to have to be accepted before anything else can be addressed.
Even Jim K seemed think the barrel pushed the slide back, and aint he a gunsmith?
Look at the fluoroscope. The slide/ barrel assembly has started backward. The lower barrel lugs are off the slidestop pin. The hammer is off vertical. Its cocking.
NOW LOOK AT THE UPPER LOCKING LUGS. The gap is behind them. The barrel is being pulled backwards by the moving slide.

If one were to remove the upper and lower lugs on the barrel (grind them off or something) and fire the gun (you'd have to hold the slide in position) the barrel would fly outta the slide toward the target (if it could get past the bushing) and YOU WOULD STILL FEEL BACKWARDS RECOIL.

I feel this is the hurdle.
 
I want 1911Tuner to understand that the magnetic slug barrel Glock will work, and why.


Or at least acknowledge that he can read. As with every interaction with him, it's like talking to the wind.


And a small hole in the muzzle plug may create a nozzle effect that will move the slide/barrel slightly more than an open bore by increasing the gas pressure duration, but not enough to cycle a recoil action with a normal powder charge. But you have just invented the principle behind a rocket.

In case my middle school science class magnetic barrel example is too tough, consider a recoil operated rifle with long barrel firing fast burning pistol ammunition. With a long enough barrel, the bullet will exit with virtually no gas pressure behind it. Yet the action will cycle, because of opposition to the bullet's acceleration when there was pressure. In 1911Tuner's world this isn't possible.

Tinman, the difference between your example and mine is that you mistake Surface Warfare jargon for easily looked up terms and middle school physics. There is nothing I've written that wasn't defined and explained so that a 13 year old couldn't follow it.
 
You're just fulla snark, ain'tcha?

And here I am tryin' my best to be nice.

Just for the record, if you'd said some of the things to other members you've said to me, I'd have issued infractions for personal insults...but my skin is thicker than that, and I'm a nice guy.

Now then...

You still haven't explained why the welded plug means that the locked breech pistol can't work. Do you not grasp the fundamentals of balanced force vs unbalanced force?

I'll try to explain it again if you want.

barrow...

Bingo. The barrel doesn't recoil and push the slide. The slide recoils and pulls the barrel.
 
This new thread would have value if it's title was "Autoloading action primer". As a physics thread it is so-so.

[U]I think 1911Tuner’s title if not precise is sufficient for all to understand what the thread is about from the context of the text. You suggestion in not precise either as it could be a title for a thread about a new time of primer specifically created for guns having autoloading actions. There is enough text in your posts to wade through so this kind of stuff just obfuscates.[/U]

In the other thread I responded to every major point with solid counter examples, all of which 1911Tuner ignored, presumably so he wouldn't have to deal with them.

So, here we go again:

All locked breech actions remain locked for some period of time. All unlocked actions are never locked.

What kind of action is unlocked? Even the simplest blowback action is locked by the inertia of the slide until gas pressures become strong enough to over come that inertia. Just because a mechanical lock is not present it does not mean the action is without a lock.



All autoloading actions use energy derived from the firing of a cartridge. That isn't a physics problem, just an observation that none of them have motors. How that force is harnessed to open move the action and what sort of pros and cons come with each is why we bother to have terms like "blowback".

Here are all the different major action types for breech-loading autoloaders:
Locked breech recoil. Long recoil ejects the casing when the barrel is moving forward and the breech is locked back, short recoil ejects the casing when the barrel locks in position and the breech continues back. Secondary extraction - the extractor has to pull the casing out of the chamber.

Locked breech inertial unlocking. Used in some Benelli shotguns. Uses a locked breech with extraction provided by residual chamber pressure. Primary extraction.

Locked breech gas unlocking. Gas from the bore is tapped off to move a bolt carrier that angles the breech bolt so that it unlocks from the barrel, then pulls the bolt back to secondarily extract the casing.

Unlocked blowback. Gas pressure formed between breech sealing cartridge casing and bullet provide pneumatic force on breech face that drives it open. Self extracting (primary extraction).

Unlocked blowforward. Gas pressure formed between breech sealing cartridge casing and bullet provide pneumatic force on breech face that drives it open. Self extracting (primary extraction).

This is incorrect. “Pneumatic force” (propellant gas pressure) and friction of the bullet in the barrel (essentially the bullet and barrel are locked together) along with the movement of the gun rearward is what operates the action.


Unlocked delayed blowback. Gas pressure formed between breech sealing cartidge casing and bullet provide pneumatic force on breech face that drives it open. Self extracting (primary extraction). Uses a secondary device to decrease the speed of the breech opening without resorting purely to breechface mass or spring pressure. Gas, leverage, rifling leverage and friction delays are most common. The "delay" is not a pause, just a decreased rate of acceleration.


We have these terms so they tell us what to expect out of the firearm. Locked breech actions provide protection against over pressure rounds. The extraction is usually secondary, and the extractor works hard to tug the casing out of the chamber. No matter how much pressure the chamber has or does not have, they generally won't cycle without the bullet moving out of the barrel.

Unlocked "blowback" (or forward) actions require the gas seal of the casing because they use chamber pressure to force the unlocked action open. In the event of an overpressure, they open that much faster. They cycle whether the bullet goes anywhere or not - all they need is chamber pressure.


Let's address this Barrel Friction nonsense. The only gun where barrel friction is actually a factor in the cycle is the FN FiveSeven. The high speed bullet's friction is enough to prevent the light slide/barrel from recoiling. Otherwise, the Browning Auto 5 short recoil shotgun demonstrates that barrel friction in recoil actions doesn't matter - high friction slugs cycle just like low friction buck shot. It doesn't matter what the friction is at 1 inch a minute - that isn't how fast the bullet moves and it isn't the same. Blowforward works because the barrel is a gas tube and bullet and casing are forcing themselves out of either end. If the breech won't go back, the barrel will go forward as the casing shoves its way out.


Here's some more previously ignored examples from the other thread:

If you replaced a Glock's barrel with a magnetic tube that hurled a loose fitting 150 grain slug at 1000fps, the barrel and slide would recoil opposite of this acceleration. The barrel would cam down and stop while the slide's momentum would cause it to continue, extracting anything that happened to be under the extractor hook. In this example, recoil alone caused the gun to function normally. The same barrel installed on a blowback or blowforward gun would cause nothing to happen, despite the slug also heading out the barrel at 1000fps. Recoil did it all.

I don’t believe in your scenario that enough recoil will be generated to operate the action. You are implying making the Glock an electrically powered magnetic driver. The moment the “150 grain slug” leaves the barrel there is no remaining pressure. When a real Glock unlocks there is still remaining gas pressure on the face of the slide. I think you would have to greatly exceed 1000fps before this could be possible.


If you squibbed the barrel of a Glock, blowback and blowforward guns, then fired a high pressure blank in all three, you'd find the Glock wouldn't move at all, and both blow guns would eject their casing. Recoil, known in physics as the equal and opposite reaction to acceleration, didn't power the Glock. Gas pressure acting on the breech didn't power the Glock, either. It only powers a breech that is open to gas pressure action - unlocked breech guns.

Can a blank cycle a recoil operated gun? Sure, as long as the sum total of the mass times velocity of the gas and packing is equal to the minimum bullet momentum that will cycle the gun. Chamber gases have mass, and if they are moving a cotton wad fast enough, they can have significant enough momentum. But most recoil guns won't work this way.

Agreed this is theoretically possible with enough propellant mass.

Can a blank cycle a blowback? Similar problem, but now it is a question of chamber pressure being high enough with no bullet sealing the other end of the bore. Make the slide or spring lighter, and it becomes possible to get enough chamber pressure.

Can a blank cycle a gas operated rifle? Like a blowback, the problem is again creating enough pressure in the barrel and gas system despite not having a bullet to seal the other end. Devices are made for this.


What happens if you don't use a casing? Say you loaded a recoil and blowback gun like a blackpowder gun with a loose bullet and no brass. When fired, the gas would leak at the breech of the Glock, but the gun would still cycle. The blowback gun would blow open it's breech immediately, lose all chamber pressure and the bullet would just sit there and the slide would close after only moving a tiny distance. Another fine example of the difference between the pneumatic forces driving a blowback and the recoil forces working in a recoil operated Glock.

What happens if you double load round with too much gunpowder? If it doesn't blow up the barrel, the Glock is going to fire the bullet downrange, cycle the action and eject a spent case. The blowback or delayed blowback gun is going to have the action open faster than normal (more pneumatic pressure) and the casing is going to rupture, blowing brass and hot gas everywhere. That's the primary functional difference between locked actions and unlocked - gas pressure doesn't matter to the locked actions, but it is a major safety problem for unlocked blowback actions.

This is just wrong. Double charges have the potential for “blowing up” a barrel if that means cracking it. It depends on how fast peak pressures are reached and the quality and design of the barrel.


Summary: You can drive a recoil action with pure recoil, no gunpowder needed. But you do need something accelerating enough to cause an equal and opposite reaction.

You can cycle a blowback gun without any recoil. All you need is enough gas pressure and casing that will seal it. The amount of gas pressure will dictate the speed the action opens, not the momentum of the bullet. Different powders could make the bullet have the same muzzle velocity with completely different slide speeds. This is not possible with a recoil gun - slide velocity is only dictated by muzzle velocity, not bore gas pressure.



It drives me absolutely crazy that a cult of personality can overcome the real definitions of well understood terms and allow someone to argue his own new definitions. These terms all have real world applications. This is not the first time 1911Tuner has substituted his baloney for the facts and gotten away with it for awhile.

I think most people will think your “cult of personality” comment raises more suspicion about your credibility than 1911Tuner’s.

My comments in underlined italics. I could have made more but these are the only ones that are important.

Thank you 1911Tuner for having a thick skin. I think this thread is valuable and I hope you and the other mods can keep it open. I'll be back with more comments when I have more time. Oh, and of course the slide is pulling the barrel. I once had a discussion in 1981 with a very famous IPSC shooter who insisted the bullet exited the barrel before the slide moved so be patient and understanding with the less enlightened.
 
Last edited:
RX-79G knows exactly what he's talking about. 1911tuner likes to throw out words that he doesn't understand. A decent high school physics class would help 1911tuner's understanding of recoil vs blowback immensely.

I've asked 1911tuner to quote me his odds that a welded breech 1911 won't work. I've offered to weld up the breech and do the experiment. Still haven't heard anything from him. Talk is cheap.

Since it doesn't do any good to use words he doesn't understand anyway, I'll try it with pictures.

Is there anyone reading this who believes that the muzzleloading .45 shown below will NOT recoil? If so, please explain why.

Slide1_zpsc93fe501.jpg

Slide2_zps534cab4f.jpg

Slide3_zps63f44bdf.jpg
 
I didn't see this the first time.

The high speed bullet's friction is enough to prevent the light slide/barrel from recoiling. Otherwise, the Browning Auto 5 short recoil shotgun demonstrates that barrel friction in recoil actions doesn't matter - high friction slugs cycle just like low friction buck shot.

First off...Browning's Auto 5 shotgun was a long recoil action...not short recoil. It had to be long recoil precisely because there is no frictional drag on the barrel.

His 1917 .30 caliber machine gun was short recoil operated...and despite the much higher pressures than those generated by the shotgun...and it could be designed to function with a short recoil operation precisely because there was bullet drag on the barrel.

I've asked 1911tuner to quote me his odds that a welded breech 1911 won't work.

A welded plug in the barrel, just forward of the chamber with a powder charge between the plug and the slide can't work. Can't.

Refer to Jim Keenan's demonstration. It was essentially the same thing. Nothing moved.
 
Let's get a little more modern. We'll make a breechloading single shot .45 ACP, with the breechblock held in place by a lug on the barrel.

Does anyone doubt that this gun will recoil?

Slide4_zps74984eaa.jpg

Slide5_zps8496fd62.jpg

Slide6_zps948bcd85.jpg
 
Plugging the barrel in front of the bullet stops a recoil action because there is no bullet momentum to recoil from. There's your answer, splendid in its consistency and logic.

And Tuner, for the record, I think you're a bully who even bragged on TFL of Trolling someone on the same board you moderate. I should say you ought to have tough skin.


Your long recoil objection makes no sense. But you showed in the last thread that you don't understand long vs short recoil, so no surprise there.
 
45 auto is talkin bout plugging behind the powder charge. Tuner in front of it. I believe yall are so aggravated at each other you aint reading each other's posts!
 
LMAO!!!!

You don't think we see what you're trying to do?. Pretty funny, trying to cover your behind.

In the "Short Recoil" thread, post #20 I said:

http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=735059&highlight=short+recoil

45_auto said:
You could weld a plug into the back end of the chamber of your 1911, load it from the front with blackpowder, and it would cycle perfectly normally. Slide will cycle, hammer will cock, etc. That's because it's RECOIL operated.

Try the same thing with a blowback operated pistol like a Highpoint, and it will not cycle at all. No slide movement, no hammer recocking, etc. That's because it's BLOWBACK operated and there is no way for the pressure driving the bullet to operate the slide.

In post #23, same thread, you said:

1911tuner said:
Of course your welded plug straight blowback won't cycle. You're using the plug for a breechblock instead of the slide, and the barrel is attached to the frame. The slide would feel no force.

You do understand that the slide is a breechbolt.

And I'll bet money and quote odds that if you do the same with the barrel in a recoil operated pistol...you'll get pretty much the same results, though the slide will move a little because the barrel will move and push the slide. It won't make full cycle, though. Bet on it.

NOW you say:

A welded plug in the barrel, just forward of the chamber with a powder charge between the plug and the slide can't work. Can't.

I never said ANYTHING about a plug FORWARD of the chamber.

But just to reiterate, let's make this simple. Shouldn't require anything but a "yes" or a "no".

Do you, 1911tuner, believe that a plugged-breech (welded up barrel in the rear of the chamber) recoil operated pistol (1911 as an example) will cycle normally (full slide travel, cock hammer, return to battery, everything except eject and chamber a new round)?

Still waiting to hear your bet an the odds you'll quote me. 1911 barrel and plug are sitting on top of the TIG welder waiting to hear from you.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe you guys are still going at this. Most of your disagreement is over semantics, not physics.

Both systems operate via the energy imparted by expanding gas. The only difference (greatly simplified, of course) is that the "recoil" operated action drags the barrel along for a distance before unlocking and ejecting the case.

You guys all agree on the basic function, you're just talking past each other.
 
Last edited:
jlr2267 said:
Both systems operate via the energy imparted by expanding gas. The only difference is that the "recoil" operated action drags the barrel along for a distance before unlocking and ejecting the case.

No need for expanding gas in a recoil operated system. A magnetic 1911 will work just the same. However, a blowback system REQUIRES pressure to move the cartridge case for it to operate. That's why it's defined as:

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/blowback

Blowback

Type of weapon operation in which the force of expanding gases acting to the rear against the face of the bolt furnishes all the energy required to initiate the complete cycle of operation. A weapon which employs this method of operation is characterized by the absence of any breech-lock or bolt-lock mechanism.

Just to make things interesting for 1911tuner and the "barrel friction" theories, let's throw in a magnetically operated rail gun with ZERO barrel friction and ZERO pressure on the back end of the chamber.

If the guns in Figures 1, Figure 4, and Figure 7 all weigh the same and expel a 230 grain projectile at 850 FPS, which one will have the GREATEST recoil?

(Here's a hint: Notice that in Figures 3, 6, and 9 it says "m(gun) x v(gun) = m(bullet) x v(bullet)". That means that the mass of the gun times the velocity of the gun will equal the mass of the bullt times the velocity of the bullet. If the mass of the gun, the mass of the bullet, and the velocity of the bullet are equal in all three guns, what does that tell you aout the velocity (recoil) of all three guns?)

Slide7_zps673d7834.jpg

Slide8_zpsca77c2bb.jpg

Slide9_zps62e2c231.jpg

We'll get a little more advanced if I have some free time after lunch.
 
Last edited:
For extra credit, feel free to point out where you believe that my 1960 Schaum's Mechanical Engineering Study Guide made an error in not including chamber pressure or barrel friction in their recoil calculations. The clever reader will notice how gun weight, bullet weight, and bullet velocity are the only things that determine recoil velocity.

(If you've stuck it out this far, don't worry, we'll get to the differences between recoil and blowback and why a 1911 is recoil operated shortly.)

rp-1_zps66271804.jpg

rg-1.jpg

More fun gun pictures coming shortly!
 
Last edited:
No need for expanding gas in a recoil operated system. A magnetic 1911 will work just the same. However, a blowback system REQUIRES pressure to move the cartridge case for it to operate.

No one said there is a "need" in a generic recoil system, but in the *current designs being discussed*, that is how they operate, plain and simple. The recoil designs being discussed will not operate without expanding gas.

Your magnetic barrel design is simply moving the point of recoil force application off the case and onto the barrel, so of course a blowback operated version would not work in that design...its barrel being fixed, all the recoil would be transferred through the frame to the hand.

Now if you had a magnetic case (that could theoretically act as a magnetic barrel does), it would operate just as a blowback system (and would also operate a breech lock recoil system) :)

But again, these are not the designs being discussed.
 
Last edited:
What kind of action is unlocked? Even the simplest blowback action is locked by the inertia of the slide until gas pressures become strong enough to over come that inertia. Just because a mechanical lock is not present it does not mean the action is without a lock.
I didn't invent the term "locked" or "blowback". I'm merely explaining what they mean. And an unlocked, blowback action is defined by the fact that the action opens immediately upon application of chamber pressure, and that the speed the action opens is in direct proportion to the chamber pressure. More pressure, faster opening.

A locked breech system doesn't open due to chamber pressure. And the speed the action moves in a recoil system is also independent of chamber pressure. If you got 1000 fps out of detonation or a long, slow, low pressure burn, the slide and barrel will recoil at the same speeds.

This is incorrect. “Pneumatic force” (propellant gas pressure) and friction of the bullet in the barrel (essentially the bullet and barrel are locked together) along with the movement of the gun rearward is what operates the action.
This may be part of the problem.

In this case, you are misunderstanding what's happening. If the blowforward gun's frame was clamped to a vice and the barrel plugged, the gas pressure would still allow the casing and barrel to expand away from each other. Since the casing has nowhere to go, the gas pressure in the barrel pushes it forward. Friction certainly can assist with this, but it isn't necessary. Blowforward will work with a low friction sabot.

The barrel friction thing is just part of the 1911tuner's confusion. You can create high friction, low mass projectiles that won't cycle a recoil gun because they have all the gas pressure but none of the momentum. And you can create low friction, high mass loads that will cycle everything.


I don’t believe in your scenario that enough recoil will be generated to operate the action. You are implying making the Glock an electrically powered magnetic driver. The moment the “150 grain slug” leaves the barrel there is no remaining pressure. When a real Glock unlocks there is still remaining gas pressure on the face of the slide. I think you would have to greatly exceed 1000fps before this could be possible.
That's the problem with belief. You believe that whomever named "recoil operated actions" was using the wrong term, so you reject examples of recoil being a force that causes things to happen. But it is and does, which is why any projectile thrower, from crossbow to rail gun, recoils. Using that recoil instead of gas pressure is why we have the term "recoi operation" instead of the term "locked breech blowback". 1911Tuner is trying to sell "locked breech blowback" as the correction for what people have understood to be "recoil" since at least 1896. They didn't get it wrong.

Consider the following:
When a 150 grain projectile is accelerated up to 1000 fps, it creates the equivalent recoil momentum of accelerating a 1 lbs slide to 21 fps. (Mass x Velocity = Momentum) That means the slide will move 4 inches in 1/63 of a second at full speed. How is that not enough recoil energy to cycle a gun?

This is just wrong. Double charges have the potential for “blowing up” a barrel if that means cracking it. It depends on how fast peak pressures are reached and the quality and design of the barrel.
I was using examples that assumed nothing broke during firing. Not much point in discussing hypotheticals if the gun isn't strong enough. It is not hard to come up with examples of guns whose structural maximum chamber pressure is more than twice its operating pressure. Given that, the example works fine.
 
Hmm. The rail gun made me think.

If the magnetic rings were fixed to frame of a 1911, it wouldn't cycle at all.
If the magnetic rings were fixed to the slide, I think it would cycle normally.
If they were fixed to the barrel, I'm not sure.
 
Both systems operate via the energy imparted by expanding gas. The only difference (greatly simplified, of course) is that the "recoil" operated action drags the barrel along for a distance before unlocking and ejecting the case.
The barrel isn't dragged by the slide. They are one piece. It is a mistake to divide them into separate roles when they are clearly a unit. The only time the slide drags the barrel is when a hand pushes the slide back.

No one said there is a "need" in a generic recoil system, but in the *current designs being discussed*, that is how they operate, plain and simple. The recoil designs being discussed will not operate without expanding gas.
Yes, they will. As in my example, recoil alone accounts for more than enough energy to move a massive slide and barrel at significant speeds. I don't understand how M x V = momentum is up for debate.


Thanks to 45auto for his excellent illustrations, including the one of my magnetic barrel example.

Your magnetic barrel design is simply moving the point of recoil force application off the case and onto the barrel, so of course a blowback operated version would not work in that design...its barrel being fixed, all the recoil would be transferred through the frame to the hand.
You have just stated that it does generate recoil. Now just consider what would happen if the barrel was not attached to the frame, but was only attached to the slide:

Recoil operation.

If the magnetic rings were fixed to the slide, I think it would cycle normally.
If they were fixed to the barrel, I'm not sure.
There's no difference between them. The slide and barrel are a unit and remain so until they unlock and the barrel is stopped.
 
Yes there is. Rings on the slide would cause slide to recoil and pull the barrel back with it. Rings on the barrel would cause the barrel to recoil and bang into the slide, driving it backwards.
 
Using that recoil instead of gas pressure is why we have the term "recoi operation" instead of the term "locked breech blowback"

That recoil force *is* the gas pressure, acting on the area of the case head, in both designs. The 2 different names are an attempt to describe how the different mechanisms utilize and dissipate the energy created by the expanding gas.

Yes, they are different designs, but both operate via the force created by expanding gas attempting to escape both ends of the barrel.
 
I think that Rx and 45 both believe that the bullet traveling down the barrel somehow causes the barrel to recoil back. That's the stumblingblock.
 
Yes there is. Rings on the slide would cause slide to recoil and pull the barrel back with it. Rings on the barrel would cause the barrel to recoil and bang into the slide, driving it backwards.

The problem here is that you're starting with 1911tuner's assertion that in a normal recoil gun the slide is being forced back by the case head. The reality is that the barrel, casing and breechface form a sealed bore that are the parts in opposition to the recoil. Gas pressure is one of the things keeping them locked to each other.

Lock to the barrel to the "slide" and the slide to the frame and you have a handgun that recoils, but does not autoload. Like a single shot or revolver.
 
I think that Rx and 45 both believe that the bullet traveling down the barrel somehow causes the barrel to recoil back. That's the stumblingblock.
I think the people who wrote that engineering book believe it, too.

Recoil occurs when a force is expended between two (or more) objects that then become projectiles moving away from each at the same momentum. The source of that force doesn't matter as long as it acts on both halves. Crossbows recoil, open bore rail guns recoil, low pressure long barrel guns recoil.

Bazookas and other rocket launchers don't recoil because the force expended is not in opposition to the launcher that fires the rocket. But guns, regardless of the amount of residual bore pressure when the bullet exits, all recoil away from the projectile. That recoil is harnessed in recoil actions to drive an unlocking and extraction mechanism.

In gas piston actions the bore gas pressure is harnessed to drive an unlocking and extraction mechanism.

In blowback there is nothing to unlock and the casing is extracting itself under its own pressure.
 
I thought so.

Recoil occurs when a force is expended between two (or more) objects that then become projectiles moving away from each at the same momentum. The source of that force doesn't matter as long as it acts on both halves. Crossbows recoil, open bore rail guns recoil, low pressure long barrel guns recoil.

That's correct. The force here is between the bullet/barrel in one direction and the breechface in the other.

Youre talking like it is between the the bullet and barrel. It will be if you weld your breech with that TIG welder.
But now its open.
 
barrow said:
Rings on the slide would cause slide to recoil and pull the barrel back with it. Rings on the barrel would cause the barrel to recoil and bang into the slide, driving it backwards.

Barrow has it correct.

A 1911 is "recoil operated". It wouldn't matter if the rings were on the slide or barrel.

Rings on the slide would cause it to operate in the same manner as a gas-powered 1911 - the slide would pull the barrel backwards.

With rings on the barrel, the same recoil that would push your hand backwards on the gun in Figure 8 would push the barrel backwards (thus the slide) and operate the mechanism on a 1911.

I'll post some more pics shortly that will hopefully make it clearer.

barrow said:
Youre talking like it is between the the bullet and barrel. It will be if you weld your breech with that TIG welder.

Welding a 1911 breech shut will make it operate just like a 1911 with magnetic rings on the barrel. The same force (recoil) that pushes the barrel and your hand backward on the closed-breech gun in Figure 5 will push the barrel of a welded-breech 1911 rearward. If you fire an identical bullet at an identical velocity from the closed-breech gun in Figure 5 and from a 1911 with a welded breech, the barrels will move backwards with the same force and transfer that force into either your hand in the case of Figure 5, or the slide if the breech of the 1911 barrel is welded closed.

jlr2267 said:
The recoil designs being discussed will not operate without expanding gas.

Any recoil-operated firearm design will work without expanding gas. A recoil-operated design can be applied to any propulsive system (gas, magnetic, spring-powered, electric, etc). Go look at problem 20.28 in post#39. Notice that it doesn't say HOW he discharged the 2 OZ projectile at 1600 FPS. He could have thrown it by hand, repelled it with a magnet, used some expanding gas, etc. Doesn't matter how he did it, the recoil velocity of the boat would still have been -.667 FPS.

Hopefully it'll become clearer to you shortly when I get a chance to make some more pretty pics.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top